similar to: problem with SIP configuration AND EXTENSION.

(hardware in my computer: linux, asterisk, x100p, grandstream budge tone-100 ) Hi, When i run #asterisk ?v It show me a messages but when i try to incomming the call it show me that. Apr 11 07:59:01 NOTICE[81926]: chan_sip.c:3140 sip_reg_timeout: Registration for 'me@192.168.0.6' timed out, trying again Apr 11 07:59:01 NOTICE[81926]: chan_sip.c:5568 handle_request: Registration

Hello list When i'm trying to dial into our pstn the following errors occure: -- Executing Dial("SIP/snomsip-dbd0", "/2100") in new stack Sep 9 10:02:22 WARNING[59409]: channel.c:1901 ast_request: No channel type registered for '' Sep 9 10:02:22 NOTICE[59409]: app_dial.c:715 dial_exec: Unable to create channel of type '' == Everyone is busy/congested

Hi I?m a new user and I do test with my hardware . I have a x100p and telephone vozip. And when I run this command asterisk ?vvvvc for to test it . My computer show it ?warning? [chan_iax.so] => (Inter Asterisk eXchange) == Manager registered action IAX1peers == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/iax1.conf': Not found (No such file or directory) Apr 2 07:45:12 ERROR[16384]:

Hi, Could you please help me!! I am trying to configure the Asterisk server. I have a analog phone connected to a FXS port of a Cisco 3745 router. This router is connected to a Asterisk server via Fast Ethernet interface. I am trying to make a call from the analog phone to a SIP client. This SIP client is registered to the Asterisk server. Analog phone number: 999 SIP client : 202 Sip client IP

On 06.06.2018 16:48, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > It doesn't say that any more ;-) > > This is from my DCs > > root at dc4:~# cat /etc/resolv.conf > search samdom.example.com > nameserver 192.168.0.6 > root at dc4:~# hostname -i > 192.168.0.6 > > root at dc3:~# cat /etc/resolv.conf > search samdom.example.com > nameserver 192.168.0.7 > root at

Hi all I have registered my phone1 in asterisk server 192.168.0.9 and phone2 in asterisk server 192.168.0.6. Both are sip phones. i configured the extensions.conf file in both the server. the extensions.conf file on server 192.168.0.9 is exten=>301,1,Dial(SIP/301@192.168.0.6,20,tr) exten=>401,1,Dial(SIP/phone1,20,tr) 301 is the extension number for phone 2 in asterisk server

Hi all, Please excuse my newbie status I need help in configuring a mediatrix 1204 PSTN gateway with asterisk. Basically each FXO port is configured with a SIP username and automatic transfer extension, which should transfer incoming calls to an asterisk extension. I created extensions corresponding to the FXO port SIP usernames. Port 1 - SIP username - 21383396 - call forward to - 300

hello, i just downloaded centos 4.1 dvd iso through bittorrent, compared it with the md5 checksum (result ok), and burned the 5Mb iso boot file, in order to make a nfs networked install. my nfs server is on 192.168.0.6 and i did a mount of the iso to /mnt/centos, then inserted the boot cd in the to-be-installed server, did a "ok, your ip is 192.168.0.7, the nfs server is 192.168.0.6, and

On 10/12/15 12:58, James wrote: > On 12/10/2015 6:55 AM, Rowland penny wrote: >> On 10/12/15 10:54, Rowland penny wrote: >>> On 10/12/15 10:44, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: >>>> Hai, >>>> >>>> Ah, ok, wel, yeah, i was missing the NS on the SOA. >>>> >>>> This is imo a bug, i dont know it this is by design for samba,

On 29/02/16 10:45, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 29.02.2016 um 11:28 schrieb Rowland penny: >> On 29/02/16 09:42, Reindl Harald wrote: >>> >>> >>> Am 29.02.2016 um 10:10 schrieb Rowland penny: >>>> Everything you say is valid except for when it comes to AD dns. >>>> When you want data from a zone, you start with the SOA record, you

On 10/12/15 10:54, Rowland penny wrote: > On 10/12/15 10:44, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: >> Hai, >> >> Ah, ok, wel, yeah, i was missing the NS on the SOA. >> >> This is imo a bug, i dont know it this is by design for samba, >> so maybe a samba dev can answere this since every joined DC should >> have a NS record on the SOA as far as i know, but thats my

Hello, I am running a web server on my internal network. Clients outside the web can view it but inside the network, they get page cannot be displayed. I have tried shorewall faq 2 but it still doesn''t work. interfaces #ZONE INTERFACE BROADCAST OPTIONS net ppp0 detect dhcp,routefilter,norfc1918,routeback masq eth1 detect routeback masq #INTERFACE SUBNET ADDRESS ppp0 eth1 #LAST LINE --

As suggested on the netfilter list, I''m posting here too: Current network layout: Internet | ----100.100.251.217---- / (router) \ Internet | | | 100.100.251.220 100.100.251.218

On Nov 8, 2014, at 1:52 PM, Steve Read <sd_read at hotmail.com> wrote: > I have made changes but it is still the same. That is when the server gets the lowbat/noAC signal it does shut down as expected but the slave does not. > > Perhaps it makes sense for me to list the present settings: > > On the Master: > > nut.conf > MODE=netserver > >

Sorry for big attachment in previous mail...last 1000 lines of those logs attached now. On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 4:44 PM, Pawan Alwandi <pawan at platform.sh> wrote: > > > On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 9:54 PM, Atin Mukherjee <amukherj at redhat.com> > wrote: > >> >> On Thu, 25 May 2017 at 19:11, Pawan Alwandi <pawan at platform.sh> wrote: >>

Hello Atin, I've gotten around to this and was able to get upgrade done using 3.7.0 before moving to 3.11. For some reason 3.7.9 wasn't working well. On 3.11 though I notice that gluster/nfs is really made optional and nfs-ganesha is being recommended. We have plans to switch to nfs-ganesha on new clusters but would like to have glusterfs-gnfs on existing clusters so a seamless upgrade

On 29/02/16 11:51, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 29.02.2016 um 12:29 schrieb Rowland penny: >> On 29/02/16 10:45, Reindl Harald wrote: >>> >>> >>> Am 29.02.2016 um 11:28 schrieb Rowland penny: >>>> On 29/02/16 09:42, Reindl Harald wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Am 29.02.2016 um 10:10 schrieb Rowland penny:

On 02/12/15 10:31, mj wrote: >> I can find on the internet multiple instances of 'every DC running dns >> should have a SOA record', but I cannot find any concrete examples of an >> ldif that shows this. Does each DC have a separate SOA record in AD, or >> is there just one SOA record and the DC just claims to be the SOA, or is >> there just one SOA record

On 16.11.2015 15:08, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 16/11/15 14:00, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: >> >> >> On 16.11.2015 14:44, Rowland Penny wrote: >>> On 16/11/15 13:25, Ole Traupe wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Am 16.11.2015 um 14:06 schrieb Viktor Trojanovic: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 16.11.2015 13:48,

Hi.. I just wondering why DTMF are not recognized by aterisk on incoming calls from my SIP provider ... ANy suggesteions ?` /Mike