similar to: Important: The Asterisk Bug Tracker

Welcome to the Asterisk users community! ---------------------------------------- Asterisk.org is a fast moving project. New code is added every day. Asterisk is the leading Open Source Telephony platform, with support both for classical telephony and IP telephony. Our community is also growing fast and we're having a lot of interaction, on the IRC and on the mailing lists. It's great

Rather hasty I think. I think whatever version 1.2.X winds up on should be the most stable release of Asterisk, period. Thanks, Steve Totaro http://www.asteriskhelpdesk.com KB3OPB > -----Original Message----- > From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users- > bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Olle E Johansson > Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 5:19 AM >

This is a test, please disregard -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050111/3b3612cb/attachment.htm

Friends, At this point, we're close to 300 issues open in the bug tracker at http://bugs.digium.com Some of us spend many hours each week, if not each day, to work with the bug tracker. It's a tool for us, a very important tool to handle new features and find bugs in Asterisk, tracking them down. It is important that you consider a few things while using this tool: - If a bug marshal

Welcome to the Asterisk users community! ---------------------------------------- Asterisk is the leading Open Source Telephony platform, with support both for classical telephony and IP telephony. Asterisk.org is a fast moving project. New code is added every day. Our community is also growing fast and we're having a lot of interaction, on the IRC and on the mailing lists. It's great

Dear Asterisk Community, Asterisk 1.0 was released at Astricon 2004, in September last year. It's been almost a year and we haven't been able to go ahead and release a new version. Now is the time to try to move forward again. As we've outlined before, the process is this: -------------------------------------------------------------------- * Code freeze: At this point, we'll

Prompted by the recent discussion on the mailing list regarding the Asterisk development and release process (or lack thereof), John Todd, Thorsten Lockert, Brian K. West, and myself have put together a plan to address the most significant two legitimate concerns that have been expressed regarding these processes. Specifically: Concern #1: Asterisk release schedules and path to 1.0.0 Asterisk

http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001429 * Support for other language syntaxes in saynumber Accidentally I opened this can of worms to see if we can add support for other language syntaxes for saying numbers. Seems like Swedish, english and norwegian follow the same syntax. I've integrated existing patches for french, danish and soon portuguese syntax. The steps we're

Hi all, I'll try to explain my suggestion with my poor english. I've got the feeling that icecast is full of potential but not growing as fast as it can or simply not having the support it could have. The greatest lack are the "open doors" for new coders, webdesigners, translators, etc. Icecast is open: the sourcecode is open, the mailing list is open, etc. But a skill is

My continued thanks go out to you guys and the rest of the Asterisk community. Asterisk HAS grown quite a bit since I first used it over a year ago, and ALL the credit goes to the community. I look forward to the new tree and will continue to CVS off of the current branch so that I can stay on the cutting edge. Once again thanks for all your time and efforts in making this a great, powerful

Hello, I was trying to interface a custom backend instruction scheduler with llvm code when I realize something terrible. The scheduling code builds a graph made up of SUnit * nodes (see ScheduleDAG*.{cpp,h}). These SUnits nodes are allocated via a std::vector< SUnit >. This isn't a problem as long as the pointers are taken after the vector is fully filled and the vector never changes

Dear Asterisk community, We are now working hard to complete Asterisk 1.2, testing and finalizing the existing patches and work that is going on in the developer team. Now is too late to file feature requests for 1.2 in the bug tracker. Unless you have a solid, working and tested patch, we will not consider the feature request on behalf of the developer team. A bug marshal will propably close

During the last week, we have had several support issues being reported as bugs on the bug tracker. Since we are going into a final development stage on version 1.1dev (CVS HEAD) in order to complete the 1.2 release we are under pressure to fix bugs and handle a lot of reports in a short time frame. Neither the bug tracker or the asterisk-dev mailing list is second-line support, they're

Oh yes you're right, I missed that :) But the point still hold. Amaury Pouly 2010/8/8 Eugene Toder <eltoder at gmail.com> > > Not only this code does not compile with NDEBUG set > > I may be missing something, but why does it not compile with -DNDEBUG? > assert() macro expands to noop when NDEBUG is set. > > Eugene > > On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Amaury

On 04/24/2020 03:24 AM, Sam McCall wrote: > clangd's experience using github issues to track bugs (in a separate repo) has been very positive, and I'm glad you're pushing on this! > > Part of this has been that our issue tracker has been scoped to our subproject only, which is a scope that the tool works well for (on the user and developer side). > As such I don't

> On May 31, 2016, at 12:31 PM, Renato Golin via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > There has been some discussion on IRC about SVN hosting and the perils > of doing it ourselves. The consensus on the current discussion was > that moving to a Git-only solution would have some disvantages, but > many advantages. Furthermore, not hosting our own repos would save us

Sunday news is today published on a monday. Yesterday was fourth of july, and I used that as an excuse for being off line yesterday. (Sweden's national day is June 6th - and it's not yet a public holiday, btw). Most of my Asterisk time lately have been used for producing the registration site for Astricon and tracking down speakers that haven't sent in their material for the conference

Hi! My name is Bruno Baruffaldi, I am a Computer Science student from Argentina . I am interested in working for Xapian for GSoC and I have been reading the developers guide. I try to take a look of the bug tracker, but it is seems that I need a username and a password. Is it correct? -- Atte. Bruno Baruffaldi -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

> Not only this code does not compile with NDEBUG set I may be missing something, but why does it not compile with -DNDEBUG? assert() macro expands to noop when NDEBUG is set. Eugene On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Amaury Pouly <amaury.pouly at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > I was trying to interface a custom backend instruction scheduler with llvm > code when I realize

This week starts with the exciting news: We're getting close to Asterisk 1.0 again. After the failed attempt earlier this year, we've been able to remove a lot of the MAJOR/CRASH bugs from the bug tracker and Mark feel's it's time to target 1.0 again. At this point, the community needs to work as a community, spending extra time on finding bugs, solving issues, improving