similar to: smtp question

I have a mail server that handles several domains. One of these domains has decided to use Postini. For those not familiar with Postini, you set your MX records to use their mail servers. They filter mail, and deliver you only the clean virus/spam free mail. The idea is to only allow incoming mail from their mail servers so spammers are unable to send to your mail server directly. This is

Any ideas? This one would make the 10th email received. Return-Path: <centos-bounces at centos.org> Received: from psmtp.com (exprod8mx192.postini.com [64.18.3.171]) by mail.pdinc.us (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with SMTP id p2LKkur4025229 for <jpyeron at pdinc.us>; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 16:46:57 -0400 Received: from source ([72.26.200.202]) by exprod8mx192.postini.com ([64.18.7.10]) with

Hello list, I am getting the list with days of delay, take for example this message: Received: from unknown (HELO lists.digium.com) (216.207.245.17) by mxavas16.fe.aruba.it with SMTP; 29 Jun 2007 13:38:37 -0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=INXS.digium.internal) by lists.digium.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com>) id

Every time I post to the list I get the following response indicating that there is a mail loop. the recipient maxx@digital-system.it has some problems with looping. Hi. This is the qmail-send program at smtp.register.it. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.

Hopefully this isnt TOO general of a question. I have a raid server that runs dovecot and exports via nfs the maildir format store. I have 4 mail servers running exim that use dovecot to deliver over nfs I have been examing our entire setup and had the thought, would it be recommended to instead have another exim process running directly on the raid server and have my mail servers deliver mail

I recently implemented v2.0.9 using ''shorewall setup guide'' 2004-07-31. Starting with block everything not known to be in use and opening ports as complaints come in. This has led to a few rule changes. After a rule change I use shorewall restart to reload the rules. Seems to work OK... except for an outbound NAT SMTP connection from a mail server on .122 to postini.com. The

On Friday, June 10, 2005 3:16 AM, Andrew Kohlsmith [SMTP:akohlsmith-asterisk@benshaw.com] wrote: > On Friday 10 June 2005 04:08, Terry H. Gilsenan wrote: > > Received: from source ([81.56.129.44]) by exprod5mx8.postini.com > > ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 00:29:16 PDT > > > > Your MTA claimed it was called "SOURCE" but rDNS tells the recipient

Hi, I have this setup: (PSTN E1 PRI) -- Asterisk -- (crosscable) -- Alcatel PBX --- analog phones and a few of VoIP phones directly connected to Asterisk. Calling a number (only one until now!) - an automatic responder (IVR) - from VoIP phones works, from analog phones doesn't work: NOANSWER after a few seconds. I'm using no 'r' in dial options (this caused a problem with an IVR

Hello, I have a 4 port FXO digium card with 3 PSTNs attached to it and AsteriskAtHome setup. Everything is working fine except outbound calls. When I dial a outside number, it works fine, but when another employee trys to dial out while I am on a line, it will not go. I have a outgoing route setup in the AMP interface. Dial Pattern: 1NXXNXXXXXX NXXNXXXXXX NXXXXXX Trunk

Annoying :( S. -----Original Message----- From: Mail Delivery System [mailto:postmaster@bembang.com] Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 3:06 AM To: stormp@telus.net Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender This message was created automatically by mail delivery software (HiveMail). A message that you sent could not be delivered to one of its recipients: sysad The error

Is it just me? After the mail list server upgrade, the average delivery time for messages to the users list is between 4 and 5 days. The Dev list seems fine! Doug -- Ben Franklin quote: "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."

how to adjust voice volume for sipura 2000 and cisco ata186?

Previously, when our server received an email it would slap the rcpt to in the received headers by adding a for <...> any ideas what has changed? Any pointers would be grateful. Headers received today: Return-Path: <xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx at xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Received: from psmtp.com (exprod8mx220.postini.com [64.18.3.120]) by mail.pdinc.us (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with SMTP id

-- Executing unixODBCput("SIP/10-cc1b", "BLAH/blah=bkw") in new stack -- unixodbcput: family=BLAH, key=blah, value=bkw -- Executing unixODBCput("SIP/10-cc1b", "BLAH/blah=bk2") in new stack -- unixodbcput: family=BLAH, key=blah, value=bk2 -- Executing unixODBCget("SIP/10-cc1b", "testingget=BLAH/blah") in new stack -- unixodbcget:

I've had a dedicated box running for ages in my LAN without any kind of problems. Ssh has been installed and useable till tomorrow when a problem pop up. KERNEL: 2.6.5 no server or client settings have been changed. I can ping and nmap the host without any kind of problems. Bellow I'll paste a verbosed ssh try. bkw at tellus ~ $ ssh -vvv neptune OpenSSH_3.8p1, SSH protocols 1.5/2.0,

How often do you guys see Event 6 and 8 on your PRI? (aka "HDLC Abort" and "HDLC Bad FCS") Is this normal? I would think not. bkw

>From Discussion-owner@paperboy.global.avidww.com Mon Mar 12 12:01:46 2007 Received: from softgate2.softimage.com (roundrobin.global.avidww.com [172.24.33.31]) by paperboy.global.avidww.com (8.12.9/8.12.6) with SMTP id l2CH1k5I028475 for <discussion@softimage.com>; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 12:01:46 -0500 Received: from psmtp.com

Hi guys, This should be has an easy answer for you, my users are complaining that when they press # and then ear gorgeous Allison "Transfer" the timeout is very small, they must enter immediatly the extension to transfer the call. Is it possible to change this? ;transferdigittimeout => 3 ; Number of seconds to wait between digits when transfering a call This is timeout

This mail is probably spam. The original message has been altered so you can recognise or block similar unwanted mail in future. See http://www.silvervalley.k12.ca.us/index.php/195 for more details. This isn't spam? Please forward this message to postmaster@silvervalley.k12.ca.us with a request that the e-mail address you received this from be whitelisted. Content preview: Hi! Anyone know

I run thunderbird (both 3.x and 5.x) against dovecot 2.x and frequently see delays "loading message". I admit to having a very large mailbox and running multiple imap clients. I've turned on thunderbird debugging, and at least one pattern I see in the log during the delays (maybe a minute long) is the failed protocol message above. These are no the only delays, but are the ones