similar to: SMART error (OfflineUncorrectableSector) detected on host: SMART error (CurrentPendingSector) detected on host

dmesg is not reporting any issues. The /proc/mdstat looks fine. md0 : active raid1 sdb1[1] sda1[0] X blocks [2/2] [UU] however /var/log/messages says: smartd[3392] Device /dev/sda 20 offline uncorrectable sectors The machine is running fine.. raid array looks good - what is up with smartd? THanks, Jerry

Hi, all, The attached patches try to improve the current FLR logic. The idea is: removing the FLR logic from hypervisor and adding the improved logic in Control Panel. The current FLR logic in hypervisor has some issues: 1) Dstate transition is not guaranteed to properly clear the device state; 2) the current code for PCIe FLR is actually buggy: PCI_EXP_DEVSTA_TRPND doesn''t mean the

I have few disk that have offline uncorrectables sectors; I found on this page how to identify the sectors and force a write on them to trigger the relocation of bad sectors on the disk: http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net/BadBlockHowTo.txt My question is: since I'm too lazy to follow all the procedure, do you think that a force rewrite of the full disk would work? Eg. "dd

I decided, after the last discussion of smartd and S.M.A.R.T. disks, to take a look in my /var/log/messages, and I'm seeing fair bit of this: Sep 10 20:11:23 mhrichter smartd[3361]: Device: /dev/sda, 4294967295 Offline uncorrectable sectors Sep 10 20:41:23 mhrichter smartd[3361]: Device: /dev/hdb, 21 Currently unreadable (pending) sectors Sep 10 20:41:24 mhrichter smartd[3361]: Device:

Hi, I'm having some serious problems diagnosing a hardware issue in my linux system. The following error occurs intermittently. I have replaced hard drives and it is still occurring. I'm trying to determine if it's a device conflict, a problem with the motherboard or something else. Can anyone help? hda: dma_intr: status=0x51 {DriveReady SeekComplete Error} hda: dma_intr: 0x40

Hello all! Actually I use dual boot PC with CentOS4 (kernel 2.6.9-11) and WinXP (HDD 20GB, 512MB, PentiumIII 800MHz), but I have the following problem doing the image with g4u ----BEGIN ERROR MESSAGGE---- wd0: (uncorrectable data error) 8951MB 1.59MB/s wd0d: error reading fsbn 18333440 of 18333440 - 18333567 (wd0 bn 18333440; cn 18187 tn 14 sn 62) retrying wd0: (uncorrectable data error)

I can not start my laptop anymore, due to what looks like a physical HD failure. During boot I get: hda: dma_intr: error=0x40 { Uncorrectable Error }, LBAsect=260112, sector 51144 and then JBD: Failed to read block at offset 5864 JBD: recovery failed EXT3-fs: error loading journal then the laptop is frozen. While I understand this drive will need a prompt replacement, I am trying to recover

Hello! The current MCA/MCE support in Xen is that it dumps the error and panics. In the following concept I propose here, there are two places where Xen has to react on. I) Xen receives a MCE from the CPU and II) Xen receives Dom0 instructions via Hypercall The term "self-healing" below is used in the sense of using the most propriate technique(s) to handle an error such as MPR

Hello, I''m using kernel 3.1.0 and I have both / and /home as btrfs. I used suspend to ram quite often and never had a problem, but yesterday I''ve suspended to get into a plane and when I resumed my /home was all about input/output errors. Reboot did not help either. My root (/) did not suffer any problems. Today I''ve upgraded btrfs-progs to latest GIT and tried scrub

I am running software RAID1 on a somewhat critical server. Today I noticed one drive is giving errors. Good thing I had RAID. I planned on upgrading this server in next month or so. Just wandering if there was an easy way to fix this to avoid rushing the upgrade? Having a single drive is slowing down reads as well, I think. Thanks. Feb 7 15:28:28 server smartd[2980]: Device: /dev/sdb

Hello, recently I've installed 7.0 and now I'm observing strange thing with my Internet connection. Access to some sites may be VERY slow or doesn't work at all with different kinds of timeout messages or without messages at all (but other sites works fine). For example, firefox may say "Transferring data from..." message and then "The connection to the server was reset

hello everyone, I have strange issue and I am not sure why is this happening. syncing file systems... done rebooting... SC Alert: Host System has Reset Probing system devices Probing memory Probing I/O buses Sun Fire V240, No Keyboard Copyright 2006 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved. OpenBoot 4.22.19, 8192 MB memory installed, Serial #65031515. Ethernet address 0:3:ba:e0:4d:5b, Host

Edgar, thanks for the help! -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: Dovecot 2.2.16: disappearing messages, mismatched summaries, duplicated messages, excessive full re-downloads From: Edgar Pettijohn III <edgar at pettijohn-web.com> To: David Gessel <gessel at blackrosetech.com> Date: Sat Apr 18 2015 16:30:07 GMT+0300 (Arabic Standard Time) > > On Apr 18, 2015, at 8:00

On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 02:40:41PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 02:36:00PM +0000, martin f krafft wrote: > > tags 408037 wontfix > > thanks > > > Steve, I am not happy with filtering this message on the basis that > > is *is* an uncorrectable sector and thus a problem that should get > > fixed. > > No, smartd already sends its

Hi guys: I can't login as a user: The output of mail.log: Aug 31 08:39:45 socrates dovecot: auth(default): client in: AUTH^I1^IPLAIN^Iservice=imap^Ilip=178.63.82.247^Irip=81.39.27.227^Ilport=143^Irport=33715^Iresp=AHBhYmxvLnJvZHJpZ3VlekBlc2N1ZWxhc3VwZXJpb3JkZWNvYWNoaW5nLmNvbQBwZXJpa2l0YS4= Aug 31 08:39:45 socrates dovecot: auth-worker(default): sql(pablo.rodriguez at

IIRC, uncorrectable bitrot even in a nonessential file detected by ZFS used to cause a kernel panic. Bug ID 4924238 was closed with the claim that bitrot-induced panics is not a bug, but the description did mention an open bug ID 4879357, which suggests that it''s considered a bug after all. Can somebody clarify the intended behavior? For example, if I''m running Solaris in a VM,

Hallo, I''d like to get some explanations ... # btrfs filesystem show Label: ''MMedia'' uuid: 120b036a-883f-46aa-bd9a-cb6a1897c8d2 Total devices 3 FS bytes used 3.80TB devid 1 size 1.82TB used 1.29TB path /dev/sdg1 devid 3 size 1.81TB used 1.29TB path /dev/sdc1 devid 2 size 1.81TB used 1.28TB path /dev/sdb1 Btrfs Btrfs v0.19 # btrfs filesystem df /srv/MM

I started to receive this kind of messages a few days ago on one of my servers: Message from syslogd@ at Mon Apr 29 08:02:55 2013 ... server1 kernel: EDAC MC0: UE row 0, channel-a= 0 channel-b= 1 labels "-": (Branch=0 DRAM-Bank=0 RDWR=Read RAS=0 CAS=0, UE Err=0x2 (Aliased Uncorrectable Non-Mirrored Demand Data ECC)) I've never had ECC memory to fail on me before, so now I am

Hi All, Does anyone know if there's a Samba 4 to Samba 4 migration process? Sounds weird, but it has a logical reason: I've a several-year-old S4 implementation, from an early Alpha (10 I think?) that hasn't been in the best of shape of late - when S4 4.0.0 arrived, I accidentally upgraded using my normal "git pull; ./configure; make; make install" procedure and instead of

While testing raid-auto-repair patches I''m going to send out later, I just found the very last bug in my current scrub patch series: Changelog v4->v5: - fixed a deadlock when fixup is taking longer while scrub is about to end Original message follows: ------------------------ This patch set introduces two new features for scrub. They share the backref iteration code which is the