similar to: Newbie - getting two local phones tocommunicate would be a good start :)

Hi This is hard work :) I have read the Asterisk Handbook, BudgeTone User Manual, Andy Powell's useful notes, Zac Sprackett's Asterisk Resource Pages and more. I am not a linux newbie but am new to Asterisk. I have failed to find any docs that explain how to get a very very simple, minimal, system up and I am trying to get the following to work: 2 BudgePhone 102D connected on a LAN to a

Sorry for the partial post a moment ago With help I got two phones communicating - PCMA/PCMU was the problem. Next stpe is to try voicemail. VM works fine, I can leave a mesage and then retrieve it - but no MWI on the phone and no stutter dialtone. I promise I've spent the requisite 4 hours + on google etc. but have really no further ideas. The setup is 2 Grandstream phones (latest

On 21/09/2020 15:00, Elias Pereira via samba wrote: > Another doubt is about this bydefaults entry. > The dc4 has this entry, but the dc3 does not. The dc3 is the fmso roles guy. > Does it work that way or is there something wrong there? Whilst there are a few attributes that do not replicate, all DN's should. > * Comparing [DOMAIN] context... > > * DN lists have different

On 21/09/2020 15:23, Elias Pereira via samba wrote: >> The question has to be, why do you only have it on one DC ? > > I am also asking myself this question because the dc3 was the first one I > provisioned. > > Ok. Somehow this was removed. Would it be possible to recreate this entry > or the best thing to do is to change the roles to dc4 and provision another > DC

Regarding the groups, now it's all right. Another doubt is about this bydefaults entry. The dc4 has this entry, but the dc3 does not. The dc3 is the fmso roles guy. Does it work that way or is there something wrong there? * Comparing [DOMAIN] context... * DN lists have different size: 5702 != 5703 * DNs found only in ldap://DC4:

> > The question has to be, why do you only have it on one DC ? I am also asking myself this question because the dc3 was the first one I provisioned. Ok. Somehow this was removed. Would it be possible to recreate this entry or the best thing to do is to change the roles to dc4 and provision another DC instead of dc3? On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 11:13 AM Rowland penny via samba < samba at

On Wed, 2017-06-28 at 14:42 +0200, Dietmar Putz wrote: > Hello, > > recently we had two times a partial gluster outage followed by a total? > outage of all four nodes. Looking into the gluster mailing list i found? > a very similar case in? > http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2016-June/027124.html If you are talking about a crash happening on bricks, were you

Hello Anoop, thank you for your reply.... answers inside... best regards Dietmar On 29.06.2017 10:48, Anoop C S wrote: > On Wed, 2017-06-28 at 14:42 +0200, Dietmar Putz wrote: >> Hello, >> >> recently we had two times a partial gluster outage followed by a total >> outage of all four nodes. Looking into the gluster mailing list i found >> a very similar case

Hello, recently we had two times a partial gluster outage followed by a total outage of all four nodes. Looking into the gluster mailing list i found a very similar case in http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2016-June/027124.html but i'm not sure if this issue is fixed... even this outage happened on glusterfs 3.7.18 which gets no more updates since ~.20 i would kindly ask

On 21/09/2020 00:35, Elias Pereira via samba wrote: > No errors occur, but still not replicating. It is not of all entries. > > For example, there are some users that the groups they are part, differ > between the two DCs. > > In the link below there is a diff between groups of a specific user. > # ldbsearch -H /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb "(samAccountName=125202)"

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1144 Bug ID: 1144 Summary: set add always returns false or otherwise ends evaluation Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: kernel

Hi, I have finally managed to implement the Sieve "foreverypart" and "mime" extensions (RFC 5703). These are now included in the main Mercurial repository and will be included in the next release. I will be fixing a few minor details in the coming week; e.g., interaction with "include" and "editheader" extensions needs more work. Still, in the mean time,

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 5702 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20060528/4b320d1d/attachment.jpeg

On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 5:56 AM, Pavel Szalbot <pavel.szalbot at gmail.com> wrote: > This is the qemu log of instance: > > [2017-09-08 09:31:48.381077] C > [rpc-clnt-ping.c:160:rpc_clnt_ping_timer_expired] > 0-gv_openstack_1-client-1: server 10.0.1.202:49152 has not responded > in the last 1 seconds, disconnecting. > > 1 second is not an ideal value for ping timeout.

Hi all I have got a samba-3.0.13 (hot off the press) PDC running here that also works as a print server printig via cups-1.1.23. As a backend I use openldap-2.2.11 What I get in my log files is what you see below. It seems this only happens when the user prints a *.pdf file. The message shows up once in a while, definetly not for every print job that gets submitted. Printing of those *.pdf

Dear all, I want to setup the incoming calls, that don't use authentication in sip.conf file. My configurations as follows, [2000] type=peer host=dynamic insecure=port,invite ; (both) context=Testing But when I call '2000', I noticed the following message in Asterisk console, "NOTICE[5702]: chan_sip.c:10543 handle_request_invite: Failed to authenticate user

Dear all, I have postfix delivering to dovecot lda (via spamassinassin). I have configured the quota plugin, but it does not seem to respect the details in the quota table in mysql. The query I have used looks correct to me, and the user can connect to the database. I wonder if someone might put me straight on the misconfiguration. Best wishes, j. # Relevant portions of dovecot -n:

Hello Dovecot users, Here is the final v0.4.12 release of Pigeonhole for Dovecot v2.2.21. Nothing changed since the RC. Changelog v0.4.12: + Implemented the Sieve extracttext extension (RFC 5703; Section 7). It is now possible to extract body text from a message into a variable. * Increased ABI version due to changes in the Sieve interpreter's object definitions. - multiscript: Fixed

Hello Dovecot users, Here is the final v0.4.12 release of Pigeonhole for Dovecot v2.2.21. Nothing changed since the RC. Changelog v0.4.12: + Implemented the Sieve extracttext extension (RFC 5703; Section 7). It is now possible to extract body text from a message into a variable. * Increased ABI version due to changes in the Sieve interpreter's object definitions. - multiscript: Fixed

On 20/09/2020 15:31, Elias Pereira via samba wrote: >> But, the error with the replication still occurs. I thought the replication >> error was linked to the ghost entry error. >> # samba-tool drs replicate DC3 DC4 dc=campus,dc=company,dc=br --full-sync >> --sync-forced >> ERROR(<class 'samba.drs_utils.drsException'>): DsReplicaSync failed - >>