similar to: New User: Kudos, small/old platform, RPM Illegal

Hello All! My 1st use of CentOS went well on my later eqpt. Thanks and congrats on a good product. Figured I might as well see if I could use it on some old stuff, still good but obsolete. Picked an AMD 5x86 (equivalent to a Pentium 75 MHz) and decided to see if I could make it my gateway/router. Had some difficulties, not unexpected. Old CD drive couldn't read the CDs. No boot from CD

-----Original Message----- From: "centos-request at centos.org" <centos-request at centos.org> To: "centos at centos.org" <centos at centos.org> Sent: 12/30/06 12:01 PM Subject: CentOS Digest, Vol 23, Issue 30 Send CentOS mailing list submissions to centos at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit

While burning in a new desktop Epox KT-880 workstation, I'm running on my old K6-III at 360MHz. Before new X updates (put everything in today, kernel, elfutils, ntpd - Selinux issues? - xorg, ...) with my PCI ATI 7000 (Radeon) on a 19" Samsung 950b @ 1024x768 (one of 5 different resolutions I commonly use), I could scroll smoothly at reasonable rates. With the new stuff I get severe

On 12 March 2008, "William L. Maltby" <CentOS4Bill at triad.rr.com> wrote: > Message: 95 > Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 07:56:42 -0400 > From: "William L. Maltby" <CentOS4Bill at triad.rr.com> > Subject: [CentOS] CentOS 5 Evolution Update errors. > To: CentOS General List <centos at centos.org> > Message-ID: <1205323003.5338.6.camel at

We used syslinux package on IPCop with success to install from floppy, from cdrom, from usb key and pxe. I upgrade the distribution nine month ago from 2.11 to more recent versions (3.11, later 3.20). We add one consistent report of a laptop machine that boot with 2.11 but fail with 3.11 and 3.20 Symptom is that the machine don't display anything after loading the kernel and initrd. with

From: alex at milivojevic.org > At various points in time Red Hat made some somewhat conflicting > decisions. The first was that Red Hat distributions must have NPTL. > For NPTL support, there are two components of system where it is > implemented, kernel and glibc. Back then glibc supported NPTL only > for i686. NPTL support was later backported to i586 and i486. Also remember

A few weeks back I had tried to install CentOS on my old AMD 5x6x (equiv to P75 performance) with plans to use it as my firewall and router. Because there were some problems relating to RPM compile architecture (apparently), I posted and Bryan suggested IPCop, even at peril to his life on these lists ;-) according to him. ;-) ;-) Just wanted to tell him thanks, it's worked out well. Had

Oops! Sent this to myself by mistake. -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: "William L. Maltby" <CentOS4Bill at triad.rr.com> Subject: Re: [CentOS] How Auto Start Greeter on Ctrl-Alt-F8? Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2008 17:28:20 -0500 Size: 1216 URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20081107/c67578f6/attachment-0004.mht>

Scott Silva <ssilva at sgvwater.com> wrote: > on 8-28-2008 4:15 PM William L. Maltby spake the following: >> > On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 15:50 -0700, Scott Silva wrote: >> >>> >> <snip> >>> >> > >> >>> >> I have motherboards in my garage older than you! ;-D >>> >> > >>

On Tue, 5 Nov 2013, Rafael Espíndola wrote: > Please include a testcase with the patch. I'm sending testcase here. Compile it with "clang -O2 -march=k6-2 -c loop.c" > gas uses " nopl 0x0(%eax)" for k6_2. Are you sure it is a gas bug? Yes, it is gas bug. I should report it to binutils maintainers. Mikulas > On 3 November 2013 13:50, Mikulas Patocka >

Please include a testcase with the patch. gas uses " nopl 0x0(%eax)" for k6_2. Are you sure it is a gas bug? On 3 November 2013 13:50, Mikulas Patocka <mikulas at artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> wrote: > Hi > > This patch fixes code generation bug - 586-class CPUs don't support the > nopl instruction and some 686-class CPUs don't support it too. > > I

Hi This patch fixes code generation bug - 586-class CPUs don't support the nopl instruction and some 686-class CPUs don't support it too. I created bug 17792 for that. BTW. I think you should also optimize padding on these CPUs - instead of a stream of 0x90 nops, you should generate variants of "lea (%esi), %esi" instruction like gcc. This patch disables generation of

On Mon, 2016-05-02 at 14:06 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 05/02/2016 01:46 PM, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote: > <snip> > >> Anyone else experiencing unstable behaviour of FF 45.1 on C6? > > > > Day it was out I got the same. Since I already had some difficulties > > with RH6/C6 upgrades changing the way things worked (or didn't, such as > > telinit),

My hat is off to everyone that's worked on LLVM. I started coding Stacker yesterday from scratch as a background task in between doing "real" :) work. Tonight I got my first program generated by the Stacker compiler to compile, link and execute. The entire control flow of Stacker is done (mind you its trivial). All that remains is to fill in code generation for about 60 built-in

I'm sure this isn't said enough, so kudos to Timo for what has to be the best IMAP server anywhere, hands-down no qualifications! And to think, it's a one man operation ... although perhaps that is one of the reasons it is so good.

Just wanted to say kudos to the samba team for a great job on samba 3. Im still reading up on all the nice features with samba 3, but so far, I really like it. Just wanted to say great job! Jason

Can anyone explain the following behavior to me? [jgreen at t-rex ~]$ nslookup proteome.hpcc.triad.local Server: 127.0.0.1 Address: 127.0.0.1#53 Name: proteome.hpcc.triad.local Address: 10.2.149.1 [jgreen at t-rex ~]$ nslookup proteome.vlan88.hpcc.triad.local Server: 127.0.0.1 Address: 127.0.0.1#53 Name: proteome.vlan88.hpcc.triad.local Address: 192.168.88.179

I think you would implement it as a new type of filter rule. similar to 'P' (preserve) but with a timestamp or delta-time to define what counts as 'recent' as well as the pattern to match for this rule to apply (which could just be a wildcard matching anything by default, but could also use the full pattern-matching capabilities if required). Have a look at: the

Hi, I am trying to use two products that use SysLinux and finally realised the SysLinux is the cause of my woes. I'm trying to use Freesco and IPCop. IPCop version 1.3 used a different boot loader to 1.4 which uses SysLinux. I have been through numerous trials and tribulations in trying to get Freesco to work but eventually gave up and went with IPCop. I kept getting the "Boot

I'm sitting here working away on various unrelated projects and watching patch after patch after patch flow in from Timo to fix all sorts of problems people are reporting. A coding madman on fire. Thanks Timo, you rock. I appreciate the time you spend on this software, I'm sure everyone else does as well. :) -te -- Troy Engel | Systems Engineer Fluid, Inc | http://www.fluid.com