similar to: Patch to fix vmail.cgi forwarding problem

Hello All, I've mostly solved my DID problem from a few days ago. Apparenly the lines weren't configured properly. Now heres the next question. 12 E&M wink lines from telco. I have them all plugging into an Adtran 750 with FXS cards. The Adtran ports are configured DPO. How do I signal this from Zaptel. I have them setup E&M in zaptel.conf and EM_W in zapata.conf. They

Has anyone on the list been able to locate and try out the 1.1.0 firmware? It was released in November, but I have yet to get my hands on it. The Polycom site has way more docs online, but the link to the firmware only brings up the release notes. -sb

Caller*ID used to work as some point, but I can't seem to get it going these days. The card is a x101p. I've tried going up and down the rxgain scale. Can the txgain effect it at all? When I plug in a phone into the line with a splitter it can decode caller id with no problems. Reading through the mailing list archives hasn't given me any move clues. Any ideas?

From: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz at microsoft.com> Rename camel case variables in channel.c Signed-off-by: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz at microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Hank Janssen <hjanssen at microsoft.com> --- drivers/staging/hv/channel.c | 729 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- 1 files changed, 368 insertions(+), 361 deletions(-) diff --git

From: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz at microsoft.com> Rename camel case variables in channel.c Signed-off-by: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz at microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Hank Janssen <hjanssen at microsoft.com> --- drivers/staging/hv/channel.c | 729 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- 1 files changed, 368 insertions(+), 361 deletions(-) diff --git

Can anyone explain this oddity to me? Given two classes as follows: class Question < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :category end class Category < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :questions end I get the following: >> q = Question.find 6789 => #<Question:0x37e9e70 @attributes={"id"=>"6789",

Hey All, I''m trying to put a messaging system together using this http://www.novawave.net/public/rails_messaging_tutorial.html. All working fine but I''d like to be to thread the replies. At the moment, a message goes out, someone replies to it and the original is simply included in the reply. I''d like to be able to thread the replies using acts_as_tree or something but

Is there any way to configure Mongrel''s logging? Specifically, I''d like to get it to output to syslog. Our Rails apps already do this (via SyslogLogger) - is there any way to persuade Mongrel to do the same? Thanks! -- paul.butcher->msgCount++ Snetterton, Castle Combe, Cadwell Park... Who says I have a one track mind? MSN: paul at paulbutcher.com AIM: paulrabutcher Skype:

Is there any documentation about how mock objects work in RoR, specifically exactly how one should use the test/mocks directory. Is it just me being incompetent searching for it, or hasn''t this been documented yet? Thanks in advance for your help! paul.butcher->msgCount++ Snetterton, Castle Combe, Cadwell Park... Who says I have a one track mind? -- Posted via

From: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz at microsoft.com> Rename camel case variables in channel.c Signed-off-by: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz at microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Hank Janssen <hjanssen at microsoft.com> --- drivers/staging/hv/channel.c | 733 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- 1 files changed, 370 insertions(+), 363 deletions(-) diff --git

From: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz at microsoft.com> Remove camel cases from vmbus channel functions Converted the function names, local variables to lower cases. More patches will be submitted soon to remove the remaining camel cases. Signed-off-by: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz at microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Hank Janssen <hjanssen at microsoft.com> --- drivers/staging/hv/channel.c

From: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz at microsoft.com> Rename camel case variables in channel.c Signed-off-by: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz at microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Hank Janssen <hjanssen at microsoft.com> --- drivers/staging/hv/channel.c | 733 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- 1 files changed, 370 insertions(+), 363 deletions(-) diff --git

From: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz at microsoft.com> Remove camel cases from vmbus channel functions Converted the function names, local variables to lower cases. More patches will be submitted soon to remove the remaining camel cases. Signed-off-by: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz at microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Hank Janssen <hjanssen at microsoft.com> --- drivers/staging/hv/channel.c

Hi, I am trying to implement a dialplan in which the user is notified of a missed call, if no voicemail is left. Basically what I would like to achieve is something like ... exten => _0207XXXXXXX,1,DIAL(SIP/${EXTEN},15) exten => _0207XXXXXXX,2,HasNewVoicemail(${EXTEN:4}@default:INBOX|msgcount) exten => _0207XXXXXXX,3,Voicemail(u${EXTEN:4}) exten =>

Rename camel case variables in channel.c and changed them to lowercase. Sending this from my own accounts till we have a proper mail server set up that allows us to send out patches without issues. This patch was created by Haiyang Zhang. Signed-off-by: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz at microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Hank Janssen <hjanssen at microsoft.com> ---

Rename camel case variables in channel.c and changed them to lowercase. Sending this from my own accounts till we have a proper mail server set up that allows us to send out patches without issues. This patch was created by Haiyang Zhang. Signed-off-by: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz at microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Hank Janssen <hjanssen at microsoft.com> ---

All, Although I''ve been keeping an eye on Ruby for several years now, I don''t have a huge amount of experience with it. So please forgive me if I''m missing something obvious. I''m in the process of writing my first really "serious" Rails app and would appreciate your advice. I am wondering if there is a standard idiom for including assertions in

I am aware that controllers can be placed in modules: ruby script/generate controller modulename/controllername But what does this buy me? Is it just a way of ensuring that my source code is nicely arranged, or can I use the fact that a set of controllers are all within a particular model to implement functionality common to all of those controllers? Why am I asking? The app

While running tests, we would like to instrument some of the classes under test. We still want the classes to do exactly what they currently do, but we would like them to do more when running in the test environment. Clearly we can (and currently do) just extend the objects "on the fly" where necessary, but this is a bit messy - we''d like some centralised way to always

We have been searching for a Rails deployment architecture which works for us for some time. We''ve recently moved from Apache 1.3 + FastCGI to Apache 2.2 + mod_proxy_balancer + mongrel_cluster, and it''s a significant improvement. But it still exhibits serious performance problems. We have the beginnings of a fix that we would like to share. To illustrate the problem, imagine a