similar to: correct way for cvs update?

FYI and to whom it may concern, I have made Debian packages of Asterisk et. al. You still need to build a new kernel and the zaptel modules from source, but Asterisk and libpri are manageable with dpkg. The debs as well as mirrors of the source distribution are here: http://www.ntgos.com/Projects/Asterisk/Download http://parc.styx.org/asterisk I would also like to mirror the CVS repository as

I just fetched today's cvs (1/30/04 11:10:31). Compiles/installs on my test machine (ASUS A7V, 900 MHZ). However, If I try to compile on my production machine (Elite K7S5A, 2.4GHz, 512MB) while * is running the zaptel and asterisk compiles seg fault. I am assuming that they will compile correctly if I bring down * and rmmod the zaptel driver. 0.7.1 compiled and is now running. Is there

Is there a traceroute equivalent in the VoIP world? I would like to see the route a call takes after it gets to the gateway. Basically showing all the hops until it reaches it's destination or PSTN termination. -Dave

On 28.05.2018 14:30, Hauke Fath wrote: > On Mon, 28 May 2018 13:52:01 +0300, Aki Tuomi wrote: >> I'm sure. But putting it as ssl_ca makes no sense, since it becomes >> confused what it is for. > I guess - I haven't had a need for client certs, and only ever used > ssl_ca for the server ca chain. > >> We can try restoring this as ssl_cert_chain setting in

This thread got me thinking of other servers that would run asterisk. The obvious question comes up if Xebian (the xbox version of Debian) would run as a SIP only server? Asterisk on an XBox would be a small box! Cheap too. Tom Schaefer

Is it possible to get a few 7960's and asterisk to allow all of the 7960 phones to use one extentsion and can only be used by one person at a time, have it indicate on the other 7960's when one of the others has the line engaged. Basicly so like I can setup a rule when an incoming call comes from IAX to divert to this extension, it will ring the extension (thus all phones), and allow me to

I constantly get the following error messages in /var/log/asterisk/messages: Dec 8 10:52:57 WARNING[1009521664]: File chan_iax.c, Line 3324 (iax_ack_registry): Received unsolicited registry ack from '192.168.0.1' Dec 8 10:52:57 WARNING[1009521664]: File chan_iax.c, Line 4181 (socket_read): Registration failure Where 192.168.0.1 is another asterisk server. Below are the local and

Can samba connect to an NFS share and then re-export that share so my windows XP users can connect to it? Basically I have a NFS share that all of my windows XP users need read-only access to. The goal of this project is to replace an old MS Gateway Services for Novell server (using IPX) with something that can do the same thing but over IP. I am pretty sure Novell and AD can share files

Hi all I'm trying to set up Asterisk on FreeBSD 4.9 to route calls to H.323 GK. I have installed asterisk using the ports. It seems to be running OK, but when i try to dial through h323, it segfaults I'm using X-Lite as SIP client, i have set up my h323.conf [general port = 1721 bindaddr = 0.0.0.0 tos = lowdelaydtmfmode = rfc2833 context = Out noFastStart = yes noH245Tunneling = no

Ok, so I figured I''d move this here since IRC isn''t the place for it. Ok, so I have my 40ish servers. Of those, 36 or so of them have hosts entries that need to look like this: 127.0.0.1 localhost 172.x.x.x dbprod1.xxx.com dbprod1 172.x.x.x mgmt01.xxx.com mgmt01 puppet certmaster 172.x.x.x mybox.xxx.com mybox Where mybox is the name of the box. The others have a few

Hi everyone, samba 2.2.5 The server I'm using has 2 interfaces so using the interface parameter I'm telling samba to use eth0 but for some reason when I do netstat it is listening on eth1 interface = eth0 (the IP is 192.168.6.10) netstat -an udp 0 0 138.79.161.225:137 0.0.0.0:* udp 0 0 0.0.0.0:137 0.0.0.0:* udp 0 0 138.79.161.225:138

All, our dovecot installation provides a bundle of intermedia CA certificates using the ssl_ca option. 2.3.0 does not supply the bundle, resulting in various clients either complaining about an unverifiable server cert, or quietly not connecting. The log has Jan 5 17:01:46 Bounce dovecot: imap-login: Disconnected (no auth attempts in 0 secs): user=<>, rip=XXX, lip=YYY, TLS

On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 13:22:07 +0200, Aki Tuomi wrote: > Can you try if it works if you concatenate the cert and cert-chain > to single file? We'll start looking if this is misunderstanding or bug. This is a production machine, so I would rather stick with the downgrade until you've looked into the issue. I went home late yesterday. ;) Cheerio, Hauke -- The ASCII Ribbon

Hi list, after about a day of operation, dovecot 1.0alpha5 (NetBSD/i386 2.1) died on me with Dec 14 10:53:52 bounce dovecot: pipe() failed: Too many open files Dec 14 10:54:23 bounce last message repeated 279661 times Dec 14 10:56:23 bounce last message repeated 1071807 times Dec 14 10:56:59 bounce last message repeated 325386 times -- any ideas on what to tune? hauke -- /~\ The ASCII

On 11/13/18 19:58, Aki Tuomi wrote: > On 13 November 2018 at 20:53 Arkadiusz Mi?kiewicz wrote: >> I'm considering dovecot migration from 2.2.36 run with openssl 1.0.2o to >> dovecot 2.3.3 run with openssl 1.1.1. >> >> Currently I have both variants running with identical configs and certs >> (the only differences are due to config syntax changes in dovecot

Hi, the email status problem that I reported for Dovecot 0.99.10.5 on June 3rd does still show up in 0.99.10.6. Quoting myself: (1) When new mail is delivered to the inbox, the last read mail(s) change(s) to "unread". Clients: Eudora 6 (Mac), Mozilla 1.6 (NetBSD, Linux, Win XP), MS Outlook. (2) When you attempt to move mails from the inbox to another folder with Mozilla (1.6 on

Hello, We are using Samba to connect our ClearCase server to the Windows environment. Our original configuration was one server hosting all our VOBs and Views. We have Samba configured to allow mapping of shares to our ClearCase Windows Clients. Everything was working fine. Now we have set up a second server to host all our Views separate from the VOBs. So we have a View server and a separate VOB

I am being asked to determine the feasibility of serving hundreds (300-400) of directories as individual shares instead of sharing a single parent directory. Personally, I don't think this is a good idea. Clients will go from having a single connection to a single share to 50-300 connections to multiple shares. That can't be good for performance or load. I've searched the mailing

I had need of a bit of computer archeology (oddly enough, for a couple of archaeologists, but that's another story). I used Henry Bartlett' HABit Wordstar Converter (version 3) (http://www.hotkey.net.au/~hambar/habit/wsconvrm.htm) to convert some Wordstar for Mess-DOS files to text and HTML. It worked just fine under wine (http://www.winehq.org). wine-20041201-1fc3winehq on Fedora Core 3

sorry for the cross post, but this is germane to the developpers as well as the larger user community. Re: [SIP 0000104]: [patch] Cisco-like NAT trick for outbound SIP connections On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 08:07:29PM -0600, bugs@digium.com wrote: > > A BUGNOTE has been added to this bug. tabarnac! it's been months now! the only thing that i can think at this point is that mark