similar to: hdparm: Inappropriate ioctl for device

At the present moment, my guest is running inside qemu and host is kvm intel, running Ubuntu 14.04, kernel is 4.3.0 stable. From within the guest, when I run "hdparm -i /dev/sdb" on the guest, I get: HDIO_GET_IDENTITY failed: Invalid argument as the error,but on the host, I will get the full harddisk/SSD info. Can I know how to resolve this so that the output is the same for both

Hi there, I'm running a centos 5.2 (with a centos 5.3 kernel) on a box with a samsung 1To green edition, and this disk looks a bit slow to me and it's not recognized by hdparm : # hdparm -iI /dev/sda /dev/sda: HDIO_GET_IDENTITY failed: Invalid argument HDIO_DRIVE_CMD(identify) failed: Invalid argument # hdparm -tT /dev/sda /dev/sda: Timing cached reads: 2252 MB in 2.00 seconds =

>> Hello Everyone, >> >> Since rebooting my Centos 6.10 Openvz server "daisy" yesterday, I am >> getting horrible system performance.? /var/log/messages is full of >> HDIO_GET_IDENTITY failed for /dev/sdb.? The latest entries look like >> this: >> >> Apr 22 08:51:32 daisy kernel: [141224.655699] CT: 1005: stopped >> Apr 22 08:55:04

Hello Everyone, Since rebooting my Centos 6.10 Openvz server "daisy" yesterday, I am getting horrible system performance.? /var/log/messages is full of HDIO_GET_IDENTITY failed for /dev/sdb.? The latest entries look like this: Apr 22 08:51:32 daisy kernel: [141224.655699] CT: 1005: stopped Apr 22 08:55:04 daisy ata_id[21513]: HDIO_GET_IDENTITY failed for '/dev/sdb' Apr 22

> Hello Everyone, > > Since rebooting my Centos 6.10 Openvz server "daisy" yesterday, I am > getting horrible system performance.? /var/log/messages is full of > HDIO_GET_IDENTITY failed for /dev/sdb.? The latest entries look like this: > > Apr 22 08:51:32 daisy kernel: [141224.655699] CT: 1005: stopped > Apr 22 08:55:04 daisy ata_id[21513]: HDIO_GET_IDENTITY

The file are there: http://thdei.info/results.zip and http://thdei.info/mos_6_MOS-USA_Test-114_20060605-042551cut-PESQ.png because, last time I put them in attachment and the mail was waiting for approvement and I never see it anmore . ________________________________ From: Deillon Thomas-WTD008 Sent: 05 June 2006 14:32 To: 'asterisk-users@lists.digium.com' Subject: Quality of Asterisk

Correct, 3ware 9670SE SATA-II Raid PCIe [root at daisy dev]# lspci 00:00.0 Memory controller: NVIDIA Corporation CK804 Memory Controller (rev a3) 00:01.0 ISA bridge: NVIDIA Corporation CK804 ISA Bridge (rev a3) 00:01.1 SMBus: NVIDIA Corporation CK804 SMBus (rev a2) 00:02.0 USB controller: NVIDIA Corporation CK804 USB Controller (rev a2) 00:02.1 USB controller: NVIDIA Corporation CK804 USB

I need to disable the spin-down on an external USB drive because it spins down spontaneously while in use. The drive forgets the spindown-disable state across power outage so I need to reissue the hdparm command with each boot or hotplug. Where should I put the hdparm command to do this?

I am running centos 5.2 i686. The /boot/config indicates that VIA82CXXXX is built into the kernel. CONFIG_BLK_DEV_VIA82CXXX=y my lspci -v gives 00:0f.0 IDE interface: VIA Technologies, Inc. CX700M2 IDE (prog-if 8a [Master SecP PriP]) Subsystem: VIA Technologies, Inc. Unknown device 0581 Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 32 I/O ports at fc00 [size=16]

I believe I've posted before about one of the speed issues we were having, of backups taking many, many hours that should *not* take that long. My manager and I finally nailed it down to the h/d itself. Identical boxes, and he tried a backup of one system which took under two hours, while the same regular one rand nearly six. I'd been googling on and off for weeks, and this morning, ran

Hi, I was wanting to run the equivalent of "hdparm -Tt /dev/hda" except on a SATA hard disk. What is the equivalent command for an SATA drive? I was wanting to see what kind of speed I am getting on the SATA drive. thanks, Jerry

After booting into Linux 2.6.18-8.1.3.el5xen #> hdparm -tT /dev/sda /dev/sda: Timing cached reads: 10512 MB in 1.98 seconds = 5306.82 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 210 MB in 3.02 seconds = 69.58 MB/sec Then I start a domu with the command: #>xm create <domainname> This domain uses file based Virtual block devices. And now the hard drive performance goes down

I upgraded my Centos 4.7 server last night. Switched from a cheaper 50$ asus motherboard to a Supermicro motherboard. I also, using dd, copied entire 500g SATA seagate drive to new 500g SATA seagate drive so as to have two copies in case something went wrong. Anyway, now I keep getting this error: Nov 21 06:08:33 server kernel: hda: status timeout: status=0xd0 { Busy } Nov 21 06:08:33 server

I've got a brand new .5U P4 system running several (I think) Seagate 80gig SATA drives. I tried to copy data from the first drive (sda) to the second drive (sdc) and was only getting about 1.7megs/sec. So I figured DMA was off. And this is what happened when I typed "hdparm -d1 /dev/hdc": /dev/hdc: setting using_dma to 1 (on) HDIO_SET_DMA failed: Operation not permitted

Hi, I run a little router/firewall that also acts as a print server for the linux and win98 clients on the LAN. I have the harddisk configured so that if there is little activity, it spins down (hdparm -S 12 /dev/hda). I added smbd/nmbd today and with the two services running, the hard disk drive spins down but wakes up about every 12 minutes. Without the services, only a major event causes them

Hi there: As suggested in the docs, I am forwarding a bug report. I have just converted two partitions to ext3 from ext2 without reformatting on my home box. All is not well, however. Here's the specs AMD K6/2-3D 500 Mhz, 64MB SDRAM, 100 Mhz bus Via Apollo P5MPV3 chipset, 100 Mhz bus Opti Mad 16 931 soundcard Video= AGP S3 Trio, w/8MB RAM, PS/2 mouse. Realtek 8029 pci bus network card.

Move all the dependencies with the same name in all the distributions to a single list at the end. There should be no change to the package list used to build the p2v ISO. --- p2v/dependencies.m4 | 72 ++++++++++++++++------------------------------------- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-) diff --git a/p2v/dependencies.m4 b/p2v/dependencies.m4 index 21541b4..e590f57 100644 ---

For the inspection of the docs group: http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/IdentifyHardDisk Phil

On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 3:18 PM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > Chris Murphy wrote: >> DBAN is obsolete. NIST 800-88 for some time now says to use secure erase >> or enhanced security erase or crypto erase if supported. >> >> Other options do not erase data in remapped sectors. > > dban doesn't? What F/OSS does "secure erase"? And does it do

In my haste for help, I stupidly hit reply and changed the subject which I thought was enough for a new message, not giving much thought for the threading, etc. So apologies for the hijack, although I would think it fairly obvious that it wasn't deliberate or obvious to me... or a big deal really. My mail doesn't thread. Some further info for those actually interested in helping, I forgot