similar to: Call indicators for Brazil and other countries

Hi, Just wondering if someone could better explain how the indications.conf file actually affects Asterisk? I am using a Cisco 7940 from my Asterisk system, and have set in indications.conf "country=au" thinking that this would make the dialtones/call progress sound like the familiar Australian tones? However when I call another extension on my system, it still sounds like

Hello, I have a problem with connecting a Digium X100P card to a Brazilian analog line. Can somebody help me out with this problem? My /etc/zaptel.conf is loadzone=br defaultzone=br fxsks=1 My /etc/asterisk/indications.conf [general] country=br [br] description = Brazil ringcadance = 1000,4000 dial = 425 busy = 425/250,0/250 ring = 425/1000,0/4000 congestion =

Hi, I am having some issues with a new server install in Singapore. Outbound calls work fine. Inbound calls are not picked up by Asterisk. Zaptel 1.2.25 and Asterisk 1.2.28 both built from source. libpri installed wctdm and zaptel load without error Jun 6 23:34:03 fs01 kernel: [211138.372933] Zapata Telephony Interface Registered on major 196 Jun 6 23:34:03 fs01 kernel: [211138.372937]

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20030628/f15a3654/attachment.pgp

Hello, I'm having a little problem with passes that use LoopInfo. Their statistics aren't the same when I execute the same pass multiple times in the same program. After some investigation, I've found out that LoopInfo is the root of the problem. I wrote a little pass that counts the loop headers (number of basic blocks for which LoopInfo.isLoopHeader(BB) is true). I've picked

Hi, I'm currently developping a pass for LLVM and I was wondering what's the best way to test if it work correctly. Right now to test my pass, I'm compiling libtomcrypt with LLVM and an other time LLVM+my pass. After that I run the test framework of libtomcrypt and compare the result. Is there a best way to do that? Maybe using the test suite from LLVM is better (I tought it used

Hi, The LLVM has a good test suite. I recommend it. You can test your pass with single-source programs and multi-source programs. You can also configure the test-suite to run your test with external benchmarks within the LLVM test suite. You can also run some programs after you use your pass, to verify if your pass don't affect the behavior of the compiled program. You can do it with the

extensions.conf has ignorepat => 9 exten => _9X.,1,Dial(Zap/G2/${EXTEN:1}) The first user to try it asked if instead of keeping the same dialtone after pressing 9, if I could play a different dialtone. Can this be done? I'm running asterisk 1.0.0 in case that matters.

Dear LLVMers, My name is Raphael Ernani, and I am doing my MsC at the Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil. I have been using LLVM for a while, and I would like to participate in this year's Summer of Code. One particular idea, in your "open projects" page caught my eye, and I decided to write a proposal about it. The line that I liked in the page was "Create an LLVM

Hi there i have some problems with some clients of my asterisk box, i have some cases when a client tried to make a call and there is no ring back only a silence and then the call hung up. I dont know why this is happening. I have the following stable asterisk version: CVS-v1-0-01/18/05-19:49:31 I did the an update a few days ago, the version that i had installed before was:

On 3/30/12 1:08 PM, Raphael Ernani Rodrigues wrote: > Dear LLVMers, > > My name is Raphael Ernani, and I am doing my MsC at the Federal > University of Minas Gerais, Brazil. I have been using LLVM for a > while, and I would like to participate in this year's Summer of Code. > One particular idea, in your "open projects" page caught my eye, and I > decided to

Hi, I?m trying to make * work with Brazilian analog signalling.. I?m using the following in indications.conf file... [br] description = Brasil ringcadence = 1000,4000 dial = 425 busy = 425/250,0/250 ring = 425/1000,0/4000 callwaiting = 425/60,0/250,425/60,0/5000 I changed zaptel.conf to loadzone=br #loadzone=fr #loadzone=de #loadzone=uk #loadzone=fi #loadzone=jp #loadzone=sp #loadzone=no

Hello, I wrote my own pass which needs to do some loop unrolling. I can perform loop unrolling via opt: opt -mem2reg -loops -loop-simplify -loop-rotate -lcssa -loop-unroll -unroll-count=50 mytest.bc -o mytest.bc This command works perfectly. However, what I really want is to produce the **same behavior** but from my own pass (i.e., I don't want to use opt). I wrote a Module pass which

Hi list, Has anyone been able to get ISDN-BRI support to work reliably on Asterisk 1.4? If so, I'd love to know how you did it (hardware, distro, kernel, modules, versions, config files). I've tried to get it to work on a Debian etch system with an HFC-PCI card and the zaptel package (v1.4.7, also from xorcom.com), but with no luck: all three channels that are created when the

Hello list, Hope you all doing fine! I've tried to use the 'alias' directive in the indications.conf file but apparently it doesn't work.... It looks like maybe this feature was removed, because old sample for the indications.conf file have example using the alias parameter, but newer samples don't have it anymore.... also I couldn't find any ticket saying this parameter

On 4/3/12 9:54 AM, Raphael Ernani Rodrigues wrote: > Dear LLVMers, > > I wrote a new proposal, to improve the static array bounds checking in > SAFEcode, as follows: > > > > Improving static array bounds checking in SAFEcode > ================================================== > > > Objective > --------- > > the main objective of this project is to

hello spec''ers, i''m in the hunt for guides on testing controllers with rspec, would you guys recommend any? thanks Oliver -- Oliver Azevedo Barnes oli.azevedo.barnes at gmail.com +55 11 9768 0193 http://www.linkedin.com/in/oliverbarnes http://workingwithrails.com/person/4704-oliver-barnes

It seems the same bug is there if we do pointer swapping with selects. Do you agree? (see example below) define void @f() { entry: %a1 = alloca float, align 4 %a2 = alloca float, align 4 br label %loop end: ret void loop: %phi = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ 1, %loop ] %select_cond = icmp eq i32 %phi, 0 %ptr1 = select i1 %select_cond, float* %a1, float* %a2 %ptr2 = select i1

SECURITY OPEN SOURCE, is a Non Governmental Organization (ONG) without profit ends, located in Brasilia, capital of the Federative Republic of Brazil and has included among its objectives: Development and integration of products and software for information security based on the idea of free software, with open code (free software & open source), independence of platform and

Thanks to the folks at securityopensource.org.br, there is now a Shorewall mirror in Brazil: http://shorewall.securityopensource.org.br -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Shorewall - iptables made easy Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net