similar to: Cisco 6.0 gripes

>Anyway, isn't time to split this list in "strictly technical... >And lest we forget, another split for the Cisco/Polycom/Snom/othersipphone configurations... That would be short-sighted imo. Splitting the list or goofy offers to do the list as a PHPbb, NNTP, or other forums would only serve to dilute the value of the collective wisdom of the people on this list. Suppose the

I have been a member of the mailing list for a couple months now. I have not contributed anything because it has been difficult to gain a toehold from which I could really understand the concepts used in Ogg Vorbis. I would like to help out, but it is hard to get an idea of the overall architecture with docs like http://www.xiph.org/ogg/vorbis/doc/vorbis.html , in which every link is dead.

Finally got a new server the other day. You know I had to try out centos 6 with this one. dual quad cores, 24 gb ram (12 for each cpu) 6 working drives bays. My first big surprise was the partition system with anaconda. It is a lot different than the centos 5.x version. I am sure it is a bug that it has options for hot spares but does not allow it to be ungreyed out. I think in the end I will

On Sat, 2020-10-24 at 10:22 +0800, Hillf Danton wrote: > > Looks like we can break the lock chain by moving ttm bo's release > method out of mmap_lock, see diff below. Ah, the perfect compliment to morning java, a patchlet to wedge in and see what happens. wedge/build/boot <schlurp... ahhh> Mmm, box says no banana... a lot. [ 30.456921] ================================ [

On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 14:07:13 +0200 Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Fri, 2020-10-23 at 11:01 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > On 2020-10-22 07:28:20 [+0200], Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > I've only as yet seen nouveau lockdep gripage when firing up one of my > > > full distro KVM's. > > > > Could you please check !RT with the `threadirqs'

Maybe it''s just me.. But the cover is hideous. I love the first edition cover, it seems to fit perfectly. The new "hip" cover is a bad choice, in my opinion. Comments? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060801/043f6ec1/attachment-0001.html

Twice now with v4.15-rc6, my display has gone belly up. Note: swiotlb: suppress warning when __GFP_NOWARN is set v2 is applied, but I don't _think_ it was the first time it happened. [ 3729.558261] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: gr: TRAP ch 2 [00ff842000 Xorg[3413]] [ 3729.558269] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: gr: GPC0/TPC0/TEX: 80000041 [ 3729.558273] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: gr: GPC0/TPC1/TEX: 80000041 [

I know this isn''t productive, but I must say that I absolutely hate the wiki. I''ve never been able to use it for more than a couple minutes before it completely farts out. Please fix the wiki! Sincerely, Ryan Gahl Design Engineer Camtronics Medical Systems (an Emageon Company) Ryan.gahl-nlycWCgr5/vuufBYgWm87A@public.gmane.org 262-369-3251 The information transmitted

On Fri, 2020-10-23 at 11:01 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2020-10-22 07:28:20 [+0200], Mike Galbraith wrote: > > I've only as yet seen nouveau lockdep gripage when firing up one of my > > full distro KVM's. > > Could you please check !RT with the `threadirqs' command line option? I > don't think RT is doing here anything different (except for

Hi List, I had a wonderful meeting with GS's President last week and he is very interested in feedback on what top features, functions, bugs the community would like to see in upcoming firmware. Please keep in mind that adding new features take time to develop, test and such. So please rate your ideas on a scale of 1-10 1 = Nice to have some day 10 = Got to have it right now Things

On Feb 7, 2014, at 11:29 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On Feb 1, 2014, at 4:33 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com> wrote: > >> So, there are two primary ideas behind SSA form management in the loop optimizers of LLVM: >> >> - Require LCSSA form input, leverage its (very powerful) guarantees to simplify maintaining SSA

When writing MachineFunction unit tests, I find it quite tedious to verify correctness in C++. I would like to use FileCheck in UnitTests because FileCheck is extremely convenient/robust to verify correctness. In order to do so, I moved most of FileCheck’s implementation into a header (Support/FileCheck.h) and updated FileCheck.cpp to use this. I ran into this while writing some target agnostic

Dear R wizards: is there a clean way to assign to elements in a list? what I would like to do, in pseudo R+perl notation is f <- function(a,b) list(a+b,a-b) (c,d) <- f(1,2) and have c be assigned 1+2 and d be assigned 1-2. right now, I use the clunky x <- f(1,2) c <- x[[1]] d <- x[[2]] rm(x) which seems awful. is there a nicer syntax? regards, /iaw ---- Ivo Welch

> On 2 Jul 2018, at 15:13, Matthias Braun via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > I had similar gripes with unit testing machine function stuff. I personally would have preferred to create more tests based on a tool like llc rather than pushing more on the unit test side. Anyway I tried to push https://reviews.llvm.org/D48850 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D48850> in

gcc 8 gripes (when using './configure --enable-gcc-warnings'): nbd.c: In function 'nbd_open': nbd.c:470:3: error: 'strncpy' specified bound 108 equals destination size [-Werror=stringop-truncation] strncpy (sock.sun_path, sockname, sizeof (sock.sun_path)); The warning is a false positive, given that we currently reject names >= sizeof(sock.sun_path), and thus we are

Folks, I'm looking for a SIP or IAX phone for field techs to take with them when out on service calls. The regular desktop phones are just way too big. Is there anything like the size of a full-sized cell phone? Or smaller, not I doubt that... Tim --

I''m writing a wizard-like module in my application where, in a series of steps, the user builds upon an ActiveRecord object, and in the end, saves the AR object into the database. The ActiveRecord object is fairly complex, with a has_many association that could potentially get large, so I don''t want to store it directly in the session. In fact, having done so already caused a

I''m new to Ruby, Rails, and this list. I''ve tried searching for an answer but it all seems to be over my head. I have all the books but again they seem to leave me on my own to figure out the stuff that really matters. Where is the best place to find out the details? Exactly what are these much celebrated "naming conventions"; i.e. where do I find an exhaustive

Hi Do a search on ''wxruby'' and you''ll see that people''s main gripes are 1) stability 2) development progress 3) documentation and 4) syntax. We''re making great progress on 1-3 so thought it seemed like a good time to start looking at 4). So here''s announcing a first release of WxSugar. It can be downloaded via gems (gem install wx_sugar)

... I just tried again after removing my hosts file entry (again) and outbound is now working! I had taken it out before, but I think I was getting a different error at the time. Sometimes it seems like asking for help is itself a cure! Thanks anyway! JDC