similar to: [OT] DNS - asking for your opinion

Hey guys and gals, Anyone know of a half decent tool like DNSstuff.com only free? I need to run some diag on a few domains but it is basically a 1 shot deal and hard to justify buying. thanks, -Alan -- ?Don't eat anything you've ever seen advertised on TV? ? ? ? ?? - Michael Pollan, author of "In Defense of Food"

Hello, I am having an issue with email on all IP-based site/accounts that I set up on CENTOS 6.3 x86_64 standard ? WHM 11.34.1 (build 5). On the server's main IP address domain account/site, both sending and receiving email works just fine, however, on all IP-based accounts/sites I create the email users can send email but not receive it, and dnsstuff.com shows: All connections to

Hey everyone, I'm one of those crazy people willing to try setting up Samba4 alpha in a small production environment as a DC. I've followed the Samba4 HowTo (which is excellent by the way) and have a domain setup and functioning in a test environment. My production network, however, is not quite as nice as my test network. I have convinced IT (I work for a group of research

Anybody here having any problems with nufone? Calls are not going thru, when trying to call their customer service number it doesn't go thru. When trying to resolve www.nufone.net I get (sourec: http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/lookup.ch?name=nufone.net&type=A ): How I am searching: Searching for nufone.net A record at j.root-servers.net [192.58.128.30]: Got referral to M.GTLD-SERVERS.net.

Implement classless static routes support as specified in RFC3442. Bug-Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/884716 Bug-Ubuntu: https://launchpad.net/bugs/1526956 Signed-off-by: Benjamin Drung <benjamin.drung at profitbricks.com> --- usr/kinit/ipconfig/bootp_proto.c | 112 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ usr/kinit/ipconfig/dhcp_proto.c | 1 + usr/kinit/ipconfig/main.c | 43

Implement classless static routes support as specified in RFC3442. Bug-Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/884716 Bug-Ubuntu: https://launchpad.net/bugs/1526956 Signed-off-by: Benjamin Drung <benjamin.drung at profitbricks.com> --- usr/kinit/ipconfig/bootp_proto.c | 110 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ usr/kinit/ipconfig/dhcp_proto.c | 1 + usr/kinit/ipconfig/main.c | 50

Commit-ID: ee59de58cd3ebe9e98d19aeaadb39915b0b235fc Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/?p=libs/klibc/klibc.git;a=commit;h=ee59de58cd3ebe9e98d19aeaadb39915b0b235fc Author: Benjamin Drung <benjamin.drung at profitbricks.com> AuthorDate: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 23:04:29 +0100 Committer: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk> CommitDate: Wed, 2 Jan 2019 03:08:04 +0000 [klibc] ipconfig:

OK, so does anybody have a good firewall rule solution for what we're supposed to be doing with bind these days? Obviously port 53 is no longer enough. TIA John Hinton

Implement classless static routes support as specified in RFC3442. Bug-Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/884716 Bug-Ubuntu: https://launchpad.net/bugs/1526956 Signed-off-by: Benjamin Drung <benjamin.drung at profitbricks.com> --- usr/kinit/ipconfig/bootp_proto.c | 109 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ usr/kinit/ipconfig/dhcp_proto.c | 1 + usr/kinit/ipconfig/main.c | 54

Hello, I''m still new in using tc...I wanna ask... 1. what is the difference between classless and classful qdisc?? when I made a qdisc, are I must create both of that qdisc...??? 2. what is the difference beetween three of the classless qdisc in linux redhat 2.4, sfq pfifo and tbf if I using the htb classful qdisc ??? because when I use htb classful qdisc it means I made a qdisc that

I was using this setup and it worked fine untill i executed up2date in Redhat and updated a lot of the packages in linux. When i run the following script i get an error, which i pasted bellow. Script i run: iptables -t mangle -A FORWARD -s 171.100.20.110 -j MARK --set-mark 28 iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -s ! 171.100.20.96/27 -d 171.100.20.110 -j MARK --set-mark 29

I''m sorry to have to bother the list with this, but I''m missing something obvious and my brain is cramping or something, I cannot find the answer... Here is an entry from my log file: Sep 16 11:12:34 fw kernel: Shorewall:rfc1918:DROP:IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=00:c0:9f:1e:fa:99:00:07:50:cd:a5:80:08:00 SRC=201.1.7.201 DST=208.10.57.129 LEN=48 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=111 ID=11155 DF

I''m trying to run wondershaper in my suse 9.1 box. However, I''m getting these errors: # /etc/init.d/wondershaper restart Shutting down wondershaper Starting wondershaper Cannot find device "root" Error: Qdisc "1:" is classless. Error: Qdisc "1:1" is classless. Error: Qdisc "1:1" is classless. Error: Qdisc "1:1" is classless.

Good morning: We're about to start moving our public DNS to in-house managed servers. My first thought was "Linux + BIND" and we're done. Someone in another business unit's IT dept. has suggested tinydns be used. >From what I could find, it looks like this software hasn't really had any community drive behind it in a while. The latest RPMs on rpmforge are for red hat

There were some DNS problems recently, but it looks like the site is back up now. (If it still doesn't work for you, you can try querying at www.dnsstuff.com, but note that you can't access www.speex.org by IP address alone so you'd have to make a temp entry in your hosts file or something...) Tom Fabio (fabpet@aliceposta.it) wrote: > > I can't open the website....is

On 06/08/2019 16:21, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: > Its pretty clear how in the wiki. > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/DNS_Administration > > samba-tool dns zonecreate <Your-AD-DNS-Server-IP-or-hostname> 0.99.10.in-addr.arpa > > ;-) And that would get you a /24 network And I also thought wrong, yes the name is wrong, but it should have been '11.0'

www:/usr/src/iproute2 # make -v GNU Make version 3.79.1, by Richard Stallman and Roland McGrath. Built for i686-pc-linux-gnu Copyright (C) 1988, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 2000 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Report bugs to

Hi, Fair warning this may be a bit rambling, and is definitely a bit long. I am trying to prototype a system for doing dynamic policy-based routing (source address dependent based on reverse routes from BGP or other dynamic routing protocols.) We need to do this due to a cacophony of factors I won''t get into. To do so the general plan is to store dynamic routes in their own table,

So strange.. I copied your commando's only change the arpa and servername / domainnames All worked. So far nobody told how there ad-dc and DNS is setup.. Which i why i added : > > Debian 10, my own packages. > > Samba 4.11.6 + BIND9_DLZ is used . Now are you using samba DNS or BIND_DLZ dns ? That might help here. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk

Yes, offcourse, the 172.19 is a "bad" example. I suggest we use the official RFC 1918 zones. 10.0.0.0/8 172.16.0.0/12 192.168.0.0/16 And for example 192.168.0.0/24 as extra, or people get confused. ;-) Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Rowland penny via samba > Verzonden: woensdag 7