Displaying 20 results from an estimated 7000 matches similar to: "what is the best codec for low bandwidth? for quality?"
2005 Jul 24
11
super high bandwidth codec
I've just gotten off a skype conference call and it pisses me off that
the quality of skype is higher than my asterisk calls.
Is there such a thing as a super high bandwidth codec?
In a situation that you have the bandwidth to share is there something
that I can use for important calls when the situation warrants it?
TIA,
Dean
-------------- next part --------------
An
2005 Sep 28
1
Asterisk sound files, audio bandwidth, and sound quality
Hello, everybody:
I'm developing an application using Asterisk and a TDM-400 card.
I understand the concept of the difference between GSM and WAV files
when using Asterisk, but I'm not happy with the sound quality with the
GSM compression. It's merely *acceptable* for a telephone call, but for
anything else, it leaves something to be desired.
Case in point -- if you compare the
2017 Jan 23
2
I'm making the change to a new OS
Decided to upgrade to 7.x.
It's been a good ride 6.x, but you're living in the past.
Everything is backed up, just waiting on my new 4TB HD to arrive for a fresh
install.
See ya'll on the other side!!
2004 Apr 13
6
VoicePulse Connect Problems
Just a quick couple of questions for ya'll.
1) Does anyone know if VoicePulse Connect will be supporting dtmf tones?
I have had a terrible time getting a hold of anyone over there, and I
need this functionality before I can migrate to * completely.
2) Are there currently any problems with inbound DID's? Everything is
setup properly in *, but I am not able to receive inbound calls,
2008 Jun 18
3
remote access info please
Hi ya'll,
I built a new CentOS 5.1 server for a client, housing a Lotus Notes / Domino
server, and various other virtualized IBM software server guests, and soon
will have to physically move that server to another distant location.
My question is that I will need secure access to those servers via X, not
just the C/L terminal. What do you recommend for a good secure CentOS
program which
2004 Oct 06
2
Call Quality
Hi
I am having a problem with voice quality getting
bad after about 10-15 minutes on a call. The call
starts out fine but gets very chopy after 10-15 minutes.
It seems like a buffer problem, I am using Asterisk with
a Voicetronix Openlin4 card.
Could someone shed some light on this?
2004 Sep 28
3
CODECs and sip.conf and voice quality
Group,
Just want to share with the group my recent findings regarding
CODECs/Vocoders and the effect it has had on voice quality and the
intermittent noise and breakup problem I have which I mentioned in a
previous emailing with the u-law CODEC. Calls again are placed through a
SIP phone to a TDM400P to the PSTN. A good reference on the reasoning
behind the selection of a CODEC was found in the
2006 Mar 12
2
mail/access revisited
A while back, I posted a note asking if anyone had any ideas why
the /etc/mail/access file was not being parsed or utilized in the
efforts to stop spam and junk mail. I just looked over things again,
and have still not found any reason why it still permits the TLD's I
have listed to pass thru. I also thought perhaps there might be some
"upper limit" to the number of entries
2013 Jan 10
3
[LLVMdev] Using C++'11 language features in LLVM itself
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Justin Holewinski
<justin.holewinski at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote:
>>
>> >>
>> >> I do not think you can legally make clang a system compiler on
>> >> Windows without licensing headers/libraries from Microsoft.
>> >> So
2003 Jun 28
1
IAX2 trunking: codec bandwidth comparison notes and results
2003-06-28 Bandwidth Study - John Todd (jtodd @loligo.com)
Purpose:
-------------
To obtain a better chart of actual bandwidth usage per codec as
seen "on-the-wire" when using IAX2 trunking between two Asterisk
telephony servers.
Discussion:
-------------
Past threads on the asterisk-dev and asterisk-users lists have
indicated that the optimal way to save bandwidth on
2009 Oct 20
1
Is there a way to force a codec on an incoming sip uri call?
Hello,
I'd like to implement some public sip uri's that poeple can call into
and get an echo test. Is there a way to force a codec so that users
can test various codecs?
Something like:
echo-test at example.com (negotiates whatever codec, is there a way to
figure out what codec was negotiated and tell the user)
echo-test-g711 at example.com (forces g711)
echo-test-g729 at
2010 Apr 12
2
About speex quality
blink : It use iLBC also.
Voice over IP
RTP: A Transport Protocol for Real-Time Applications RFC3550
RCTP: Real Time Control Protocol attribute in Session Description Protocol RFC3605
SRTP: The Secure Real-time Transport Protocol RFC3711
DTMF: Dual-tone Multi-frequency Signaling RFC2833 and inband
MWI: Message Summary Event Package RFC3842
Speex and G722: Wide-band Internet Codecs
G711, iLBC
2011 Sep 28
3
Data transformation & cleaning
Hi,
I have a few methodological and implementation questions for ya'll. Thank
you in advance for your help. I have a dataset that reflects people's
preference choices. I want to see if there's any kind of clustering effect
among certain preference choices (e.g. do people who pick choice A also pick
choice D).
I have a data set that has one record per user ID, per preference choice.
2004 May 14
2
GSM v iLBC for low bandwidth connections
Hi All,
I've been playing with GSM and iLBC over low bandwidth connections
(central Asterisk box with 2mbps, to ADSL users on 512/256) and both
seem to perform well. Based upon what I've read in the archives and
at voip-info.org iLBC should perform a little better if packets are
lost, than compared to GSM. Do you find this to be true in practice,
or is GSM just as robust?
Whilst
2007 Apr 27
4
Unable to find a codec translation path from ilbc to ulaw
Hi!
As the upstream of my DSL-connection is very slow, I'd like my
sip-phones to use iLBC to connect to my *. My gateway provider only
allows ulaw. Hence, I'd like to use the follwing setup:
SIP-phone <--iLBC--> Asterisk <---ulaw----> PSTN-Gateway
I get the following error:
"Unable to find a codec translation path from ilbc to ulaw"
Setup SIP-phone:
disallow=all
2006 Dec 07
1
Codec Selection in asterisk
I have around 20-30 softphones behind NAT .. My sip.conf has nat=yes and
they all are able to register and make calls with no problem . My voip
carrier supports gsm as well as ilbc .. Server takes calls from sip phones ,
does call recording in between and forwards to voip carrier . My problem is
that half of my softphones use ilbc and rest use gsm and my provider
supports both gsm as well as
2006 Feb 20
1
g729 quality at GSM bitrates
Greetings all,
I'm trying to improve the codec selection on a few of the asterisk boxes we
have to keep the g729 licences free for calls from ATAs that don't support
anything apart from g711 and g729. GSM seems to offer noticably inferior
call quality (at least when using a softphone + decent headphones), but it's
about where I want the bitrate to be.
I know there are lots of Speex
2013 Jan 10
0
[LLVMdev] Using C++'11 language features in LLVM itself
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Justin Holewinski
> <justin.holewinski at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> I do not think you can legally make clang a
2004 Oct 01
2
Forcing a codec
Hi,
I'm having trouble explicitly forcing a codec between sip devices. Am
I missing something or is this not really possible?
I have a grandstream registering to asterisk, named sip0. Sip0 registers,
via sip, to another asterisk box, sip1. When I place a call from the
grandstream, it will travel through sip0 to sip1, where it is then placed
to the PSTN. Nothing can reinvite, this path is
2017 Jan 24
2
I'm making the change to a new OS
> -----Original Message-----
> From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Mark
> LaPierre
> Sent: Monday, January 23, 2017 7:30 PM
> To: centos at centos.org; Mark LaPierre
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] I'm making the change to a new OS
>
> On 01/22/17 23:12, TE Dukes wrote:
> > Decided to upgrade to 7.x.
> >
> > It's been a good