similar to: Some questions of heavy * deployment and stability.

Gabe Bourque wrote: > Hello Anton Tinchev, > > I'm writing to you in hopes you can answer a few questions regarding > Asterisk/Digium and it's reliability. I saw your posting in the > Asterisk mailing list (Re: [Asterisk-Users] Is Asterisk ready for "real" > use?) and decided to write directly to you. The reason being that you > are one of only a few

Hi there, Please find the required information below: username : SantanuDas subject : OS X intregration: Enabling AFPD (Netatalk) location : Networking tips ref: https://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=27658&forum=38 Cheers, Santanu

I'm first to buy 5 pack. Even for > $30.

Whicch version of zaptel and Zapata should I use with 1.0?

Can someone point me for good VRRPD (rfc2338) implementation on linux. Some stable and live project Thanks _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Anybody sucessfully got stable 1000Hz clock without Digium harware and kernel 2.6? We need to consult some peoples how to clock asterisk stable with exactly 1000 Hz without much kernel/drives patching/tweaking. Some test results we made so far: 2.6 with digium card - stable 1000 Hz. 2.6 with ztdummy - uses RTC and the clock is 1024, not 1000. 2.6 with some Realtime kernel patch - provides stable

Has anyone succesfully integrated * with a cisco voice gateway ? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20031214/3b1ba7b3/attachment.htm

I am having a problem with asterisk not being stable enough for production use. I have two cards, the digium TE406P, and the TE410P. The TE410P is the primary card that I am using but I would like to move to the TE406P for the echo cancellation and more flexibility of PCI slots available. General config info: 3 PRIs, configured as such: span=1,2,0,esf,b8zs span=2,0,0,esf,b8zs

asterisk-users-request@lists.digium.com wrote: >Send Asterisk-Users mailing list submissions to > asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > >To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > asterisk-users-request@lists.digium.com > >You can

Hi, I wish to know if GNUGk can work with * running as a gateway with the Digium FXO card. Kindly share your experiences in case there are some issues which one must know before going in for such a setup. Also, I've been reading about the DialTone detection capability by the hardware in different countries. What are the issues with it? Thanks & Regards, Deepak ----- Original Message

Need to buy 2-3 channel banks for some asterisk deployments...

Must accepts wire transfers and ships to Sofia. Thanks

Yes, i know that there are many ISDN card on the market. But when i spend money for ISDN card, i prefer to be Digiums, to get all support and help Asterisk :).

I just got my Access Bank 2 (of course i'm happy now:)). Just need the wiring scheme Thanks

I just need to buy 5-6 ADSI Phones. I wondering which of these models to choose - aastra 390 - I don't know is this an ADSI phone at all. Is there versions with and without ADSI - aastra 350 - I'm sure that it have ADSI. If there is some other good working model, it will be great, if someone points me. Thanks

Hey all, I have an as5300 I use for dial in customers, we have 4 PRIs on it. We have a few free channels on it. I'm wondering if I setup SIP on the as5300 I can have asterisk use the free channels for dial out. I'd still have to use my TDM04B for incoming calls, but at least I can expand my outgoing. Anyone done anything like this before? I've never messed with VoIP on Cisco

Just spended ~ hour googling - all boards are based on GC-XX or I750X Chipsets - all for Xeons. There also some boards for Pentium 3. Can someone point me to a board with 64Bit 3.3v PCI for ordinary P4 with 800Mhz FSB. Thanks

hey friends, We are running 2 Centos servers 4.0 and 4.4 in our office for various activies like Mailing, Web Services, Database, CVS, FTP,Samba, Squid etc. We have about 100+ users on those servers , many users don't have shell on these servers (/sbin/nologin set as default shell) and some has shell (/bin/bash). We want to monitor the user activities of those users who have shell means

On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 10:37:07AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > Hi all: > > This RFC implement a subset of packed ring which was described at > https://github.com/oasis-tcs/virtio-docs/blob/master/virtio-v1.1-packed-wd07.pdf > . The code were tested with pmd implement by Jens at > http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2018-January/089417.html. Minor > change was needed for pmd codes

On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 11:38:45AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > Hi all: > > This RFC implement packed ring layout. The code were tested with pmd > implement by Jens at > http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2018-January/089417.html. Minor change > was needed for pmd codes to kick virtqueue since it assumes a busy > polling backend. > > Test were done between localhost and