similar to: Extension Dialing problem with SIP

Hello, I have 5 digium's g.729 codecs and succesfully register with asterisk, I have incomming call from my cisco AS5300 to Asterisk through IP. But Asterisk always use g711 ulaw instead of g.729. When I disable all other codecs other than g.729 in both cisco and asterisk, calls get dropped once connected. The codec list show on my cisco AS5300 for g.729 are: g729r8 g729br8 I suspect that

Hello Eric, call progress detection is the problem. Asterisk mistakenly recognizes the call to be answered and then still "hears" the ringing that should not be there if the line was really up. To solve the problem you would have to either implement a progress detection matching your country's indication tones or at least adjust the existing one for US or Costa Rica in dsp.c. By

We encouter a situation where we need to use SIP info to convey infomation for one end point to another endpoint. I use asterisk to do the test and find asterisk does not forward the SIP info to another endpoint, but act as UAS and returns a 4xx error message. I think asterisk is not right to handle this SIP info message. In RFC 3261 Page 70 "This protocol is designed to be extended.

Hi there, I am trying to delay sending out DTMF from Voicetronix OpenLine4 to the CO line. The reason being is that Voicetronix sends out the DTMF too fast even before the line is fully established with the carrier. Usually when dialing an 8 digit number, only 7 digits are actually successfully heard by the carrier. Currently, my dial plan is: exten => _9.,1,Dial(vpb/1-1/${EXTEN:1}) Daniel

Hi, I have enabled ztdummy in order to have * compile it. I can modprobe ztdummy with no problems. The sole reason, i need ztdummy is to heve musiconhold and meetme working. However when I start *, it says this and does not start. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------- == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/zapata.conf': Found

Hi there, let me introduce myself, i am a web developer from venezuela, my english is not the best, sorry by that... i am developing a form builder, is simple, just dragging form elements to a droppable container, all works well but im showing to my friends and... surprise!!! doesn''t work in Internet Exploiter, i am a linux user with firefox, im looking in internet how fix it but i dont

NAME xx - twice as dirty SYNOPSIS ~ > gem install "double x" require "xx" include XX::XHTML doc = xhtml_{ html_{ head_{ title_{ " go xx! " } } body_{ " one more and it would be illegal " } } } URI http://rubyforge.org/frs/?group_id=1024 DESCRIPTION xx is a library designed to extend ruby objects

Last night we updated out Samba-4 AD server to version 4.2.14 usng the SERNEt packages, running on SLES 12. We have a number of services (mail services, MANTIS, etc) that access the server via the LDAP interface and in all cases we discovered that none of them where able to establish a successful LDAP connection after the upgrade.   Previously we used plain LDAP to access the server, i.e. we did

I have a simple requirement/test I'm trying to perform, but having difficulty. I have a system with 2 interfaces, BoxA: eth0? 172.26.50.102 eth1? 192.101.77.62 My goal is to have a tcp port built on BoxA such that hosts on the 192.101.77.0/24 network can reach a port on a different box on the 172.26.0.0/16 network. The target system is 172.26.10.120?? tcp/22 The port I wish to build is

Hi there, i need to drag an draggable element to an child div node inside an another div container, but i create the child node dynamicly with ids like '' div_ + i '' where ''i'' is a incremental variable, thats the problem because i need get the id of this child nodes to manipulate it, somebody knows how if i drag the element to that child node i can get the id of

> I replaced the ldns code with getdns. Works fine for more than a year now. > I am interested in how you did that. Would you mind sharing your procedure? > I don't think anybody cares. I tried to tell people. But that had no > effect. > There certainly is not as much talk about it as I would expect there to be.

It appears that when running Dovecot as a proxy-only box with "login_process_per_connection = no", it ignores the value of login_max_logging_users. And in Linux, since each socket requires a file descriptor, if you don't increase the maximum number of open files that each process is allowed to have open, imap-login will reach the 1024 open file limit and start logging the following

Thanks to Peter Dalgaard's message, I learned a bit more about the 'par' function and rewrote my HTML help file accordingly. Is it appropriate to submit such changes somewhere to improve the documentation? I would also be willing to write some missing documentation as well. Dr. Jim Lemon -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing

Hi all, I updated from 2.2 to the latest SVN head and I now get a debug assert in BranchFolder::RemoveBlocksWithHash: "vector iterators incompatible". I'm using Visual C++ 2005. I think this is the culprit code: MergePotentials.erase(CurMPIter); if (CurMPIter==B) break; The erase clears the _Mycont field (i.e. the iterator's container), while the ==

hi all for new users, finding asterisk info is unneccesary troublesome. the asterisk.org page has very little information about the product and using google for 'asterisk' is like using google for 'linux'. you get all too many hits that has nothing to do with the product. perhaps the asterisk.org page at least should point to voip-info.org? or perhaps it's time someone rewrote

It's not hard to compile the normal xapian stuff but if you download svn it can be tricky to compile the complete release. 1) Get swig 1.3.26 or higher from swig.org. The Breezy packages are too old. The rest is only needed for cvssearch. 2) `apt-get install libdb4.1++-dev` 3) Download the recent pstream.h from pstreams.sf.net Replace cvssearch/db/pstream.h and

tytso at mit.edu writes: > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 11:12:15AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote: >> >> Note that with indirect descriptors (which is supported by Almost >> Everyone), we can actually use the full index, so this value is a bit >> pessimistic. But it's OK as a starting point. > > So is this something that can go upstream with perhaps a slight >

tytso at mit.edu writes: > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 11:12:15AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote: >> >> Note that with indirect descriptors (which is supported by Almost >> Everyone), we can actually use the full index, so this value is a bit >> pessimistic. But it's OK as a starting point. > > So is this something that can go upstream with perhaps a slight >

On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Keno Fischer <kfischer at college.harvard.edu> wrote: > This might be related to GOT relocations. I rewrote that part of > RuntimeDyldELFbecause I was seeing this issue. Have you tried trunk? > I didn't notice that you were running 3.5 the first time I read this. Keno's diagnosis is very likely to be correct. You should try trunk if

Hello, Recently I've come across two instances where Induction Variable Simplification lead to noticable performance regressions. In one case, the removal of extra IV lead to the inability to reschedule instructions in a tight loop to reduce stalls. In that case, there were enough registers to spare, so using extra register for extra induction variable was preferable since it reduced