similar to: 7940/60 TFTP Problem

I have a cisco 7940 with the following sip.conf config: [Desk1.1] type=friend secret=****** defaultip=192.168.1.14 insecure=no mailbox=102 callerid="Desk1.1" qualify=500 canreinvite=no context=extensions host=dynamic group=2 I do not get message waiting indicator (mwi) on this phone. Is the another .conf file invilved in configuring this function other than the mailbox=xxx in the

I know that Asterisk supports DID, but does anyone have documentation on how to write the configuration for it? I'll be trying to setup a hybrid system where some incoming numbers will be DID enabled and others won't, so I'll need to be able to sort between the two, i.e. directly connect the DID dialed numbers and route the others to an autoattendant for extension dialing.

Hello, I've been playing around with * for quite a while now, and have run into a problem that I just cannot seem to figure out. When using * and any IAX client (I have tested with GnoPhone and both clients from iaxclient.sourceforge.net) I have incredibly bad jitter on the connection. What I'm running is a P3-1Ghz machine with 512mb ram for a server. The other end has been

I am convinced to use llvm-gcc. As I mentioned in my previous email, I have changed native code generation in llc to generate code with a different stack organization. In order to have working binaries, the libraries must be compiled with the new tool and have the same stack organization. Now that I cannot use llc, it seems that I have to modify llvm-gcc to have it generate code with the

Thank you Chris. Actually, I have changed the stack organization in the "llc" source codes for x86 target. Thus, I need libraries compiled with the new stack organization. If I use llvm-gcc (and apparently also llvmc), llc will not be invoked. I was hoping that llvmc would call llvm-gcc to compile to bc file and then call llc to compile to native assembly, but apparently this

Hi, I am trying to compile glibc on Linux using llvm. I need to do this for a research project. The problem is that llvmc doesn't work, and I guess I have to set CC=llvmc to get the glic compiled. For some reason llvmc complains that it cannot find %llvmcc1%. I have this problem both on my Mac and my Linux system. Other tools that I have tested including llvm-gcc work without any

Reid, Thank you for your quick reply. Yes, I have built and installed llvm-gcc and "llvm-gcc --print-prog- name=cc1" return the correct path for cc1, so I assume its path is set correctly in the config files, but I haven't installed config files separately. Do I need to do that? Is there any documentation about it? Thank you again, Babak On May 8, 2007, at 7:33 PM, Reid

On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 13:38 -0700, Babak Salamat wrote: > I am convinced to use llvm-gcc. As I mentioned in my previous email, > I have changed native code generation in llc to generate code with a > different stack organization. In order to have working binaries, the > libraries must be compiled with the new tool and have the same stack > organization. Now that I cannot use

Babak, I strongly suggest you drop trying to use llvmc. Instead, probably just compiling your library with llvm-gcc should be sufficient. The llvm-gcc tool has much of llc's functionality built in to it so you're going to get the same output. If that doesn't work for you, then please describe what you're trying to do in more detail and we'll tell you how it can be done.

Hello, I am trying to add an instruction before each function call to add/ subtract the stack pointer by a value specified at the command line. I wonder if I can do that during lowering. For example, in X86TargetLowering::LowerCALL. I appreciate it if you give me some hints how and where I can do that. Thank you, Babak

Babak, As its manual page (http://llvm.org/docs/CommandGuide/html/llvmc.html) states, llvmc is an experimental tool: llvmc is considered an experimental LLVM tool because it has these deficiencies: Poor configuration support The support for configuring new languages, etc. is weak. There are many command line configurations that cannot be achieved with the current

On Tue, 8 May 2007, Babak Salamat wrote: > Yes, I have built and installed llvm-gcc and "llvm-gcc --print-prog- > name=cc1" return the correct path for cc1, so I assume its path is > set correctly in the config files, but I haven't installed config > files separately. Do I need to do that? Is there any documentation > about it? I'd strongly suggest just building

Hi, During isel lowering, the backend insertes CALLSEQ_START / CALLSEQ_END target independent nodes to the DAG. These are then selected to X86 specific instructions ADJCALLSTACKDOWN / ADJCALLSTACKUP. At these point, they have a constant arguments which corresponds to the fixed frame size for argument passing. But the size of the stack frame isn't finalized until frame layout has

Hi all I want to connect my app to MSSQL but when i type rake db:migrate an erro occured like this: ←[31mCould not find gem ''odbc (>= 0, runtime)'' in any of the gem sources listed in your Gemfile.←[0m this is my YML file: development: adapter: sqlserver mode: odbc dsn: ontrack host: BABAK-PC pool: 5 timeout: 5000 and in my gem file gem

Hello, I am wondering if there is any way to figure out bitwidth of Machine Instructions. I see that ValueType information is available for nodes of DAG, but I couldn't find similar info for Machine Instructions. I particularly need this information for x86 target. I appreciate your help and comments in this regard. Thank you, Babak

Hi I am evaluating some voice broadcasting solutions based on Asterisks for more than 1000 simultaneous calls. Connection to Asterisk all are based on SIP and SIP Trunks so no DAHDI hardware is required. According to some recommendations like http://osdial.org/howto/? "Internal timing is very critical with Asterisk when it is under load" and we must use DAHDI hardware or "USB Voice

On Fri, 8 Jun 2007, Babak Salamat wrote: > I am wondering if there is any way to figure out bitwidth of Machine > Instructions. I see that ValueType information is available for nodes > of DAG, but I couldn't find similar info for Machine Instructions. I > particularly need this information for x86 target. > I appreciate your help and comments in this regard. Do you mean the

HiCould someone please help me how to set Custom generated UUID in Originate action in AMI ? RegardsBabak -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20150508/528d5ff1/attachment.html>

I've spent the past several weeks reading up and playing around with Asterisk while I've been waiting for an ISDN card I got on ebay to arrive so I can really get to business. I'd just like to run my project ideaa by some of you to hopefully get a little feedback. I aplogize if this ends up being a somewhat long message. In the Marine Corps we've somewhat recently started using

Reid and Bill, Thank you very much for your helpful comments. Your comments helped me find out what part of my work was wrong that my changes were not effective in llvm-gcc. Thank you again, Babak On May 9, 2007, at 1:57 PM, Reid Spencer wrote: > On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 13:38 -0700, Babak Salamat wrote: >> I am convinced to use llvm-gcc. As I mentioned in my previous email, >> I