similar to: VLAN tagging problems

If this has already been covered, please point me to that (I didn''t find anything in my searches)... We are using F5 BigIP LTM load balancers. They have many pools of Mongrels they load balance across, and I of course want the F5 to know when a Mongrel goes down or is unavailable, etc. To do that, I need to have an F5 health monitor for HTTP make a request to the Mongrel. We do this

Has anyone successfully puppetized BigIP (F5)? I''m specifically trying to figure out a path in making our BigIP instances be under puppet so all the VIPs, pools, profiles, etc. are all under puppet control. My requirements are probably going to be fulfilled even with just uploading a rules file if a delta''s detected. The main issue I have now is figuring out when to reload the

I'm running a pair of squids as an internal cache for some intermediate data used by a web server farm and currently doing failover by going through an F5 bigip. However, I'd like to avoid the bigip and use heartbeat since there are only two machines. I don't need to sync any content since it is a fast-changing cache and either machine can handle everything. Is it possible to

Thanks for the tips, Tom. Here is the tcpdump -n output on the dmz computer - this gets repeated several times as the remote computer attempts to connect: 18:11:54.264580 66.113.134.243.55080 > 192.168.2.1.8082: S 3210481212:3210481212(0) win 5840 <mss 1460,sackOK,timestamp 65650966 0,nop,wscale 0> (DF) 18:11:54.264696 192.168.2.1.8082 > 66.113.134.243.55080: S

Hi Ravi, back to our client-cannot-reconnect-to-gluster-brick problem ... > Von: Ravishankar N [ravishankar at redhat.com] > Gesendet: Montag, 29. Mai 2017 06:34 > An: Markus Stockhausen; gluster-users at gluster.org > Betreff: Re: [Gluster-users] gluster heal entry reappears > > > On 05/28/2017 10:31 PM, Markus Stockhausen wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm

Hi, I have a linux box with two dsl modems on it (connection is done via pppoe), I''m trying to route default traffic on the primary connection (ppp0) and mail traffic on another one (ppp1). This traffic will come from the localhost. I run Slackware 9.1 (Kernel 2.4.22), recompiled with necessary options for using iproute2. According to the advanced routing howto, I did the following

Thomas B. R?cker (il 30/07/2014 23:26) ha scritto: You could run "tcpdump -ni eth0 port 8000" and try to access the > icecast web interface. If you don't see any output, then traffic to port > 8000 is blocked externally. good point of view. Ok, let's try: root at mail2:/home/spaziouser# tcpdump -ni eth0 port 8000 tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv

Hello, I have an issue with multiple connections to the Internet. I tried following the steps described in [1] but things are not working properly. I would like the network setup as follows: ______ | |- ppp0 -- Dynamic IP (PPPoE on eth2) Internal---- eth0 | GW | |____|- eth1 -- Static IP -> Static''s GW From [1], the

Hi All, Can anyone help me hash out how best to load balance a website that is getting considerable traffic? In the past I only have experience with BigIP where you have a load balancing device that keeps track and send traffic to the best server possible at the time. This was a proprietary system that I think was something Dell rebranded. Right now, the whole site is is 400gb of video, HTML5,

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1097 Bug ID: 1097 Summary: TARPIT function does not work in ip6tables Product: netfilter/iptables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Ubuntu Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: ip6_tables (kernel) Assignee:

Last week, I started seeing very strange behavior in one of the networks that I manage. The office LAN uses a Linux firewall which masquerades their workstations over their DSL connection. There are probably ~75 workstations in the office LAN. Their mail server is in a collocated facility nearby. That server has an RFC1918 address; its router does SNAT to forward packets to the system. Both

Yep, maybe using ssl offloading devices like (BigIP) that receives tls1.2 and tlsv1.2 and then re-encrypts traffic with tls1.0 might be "cheapest" solution. -- Eero 2015-04-17 14:15 GMT+03:00 Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org>: > On 04/16/2015 05:00 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote: > > in fact: modgnutls provides easy way to get tlsv1.2 to rhel 5 > > > > -- >

Hi I have a strange problem. I have a firewall with 3 nics. 1 - lan 2 - leased line or diginet 3 - connected to adsl modem I have 2 tables in defined in /etc/iproute2/rt_tables: 200 diginet 201 adsl The ADSL modem has an IP of 192.168.0.1 and is configured to initiate the PPPOE connection. I can mark packets within the network destined for port 80 successfully: ip ro add default via x.x.x.x

On 27.06.2018 14:12, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > Can I also point that if you can only connect by IP, then you probably > have a DNS issue. > > Rowland > I dont think so. root at kes-srv-007:/var/log/samba# getent hosts kes-srv-007.kes 192.168.30.19 kes-srv-007.kes root at kes-srv-007:/var/log/samba# smbclient -U 'KES\user' \\\\kes-srv-007.kes\\websrv Enter

Hello, I am running Shorewall 2.0.2f, on SuSE 9.2 distro, kernel 2.6.8-24.11-default My ip addr show output is as follows: 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8 brd 127.255.255.255 scope host lo inet6 ::1/128 scope host valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 2: eth0:

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=704 CZ <huangj at qualcomm.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | --- Comment #4 from CZ <huangj at qualcomm.com>

Hello, Stephen, thank you for input. Yes, these servers have the same firewall rules, and both of them have the same problem from time to time, most of time they are good. Actually, these servers are newly installed to be used as the Glusterfs storage server, so not much data flowing at this time. >From the sysctl output, I suppose it can't be a conntrack table overflow :

On my network, when a mac client tries to access a windows share, they are presented with a dialog box, prompting them for the share to connect and then the authentication credentials. However, when a mac client tires to connect to a samba share, it immediately receive a dialog box with the error: "Could not connect to the sever because the name or password is not correct.". Does

I'm haveing trouble connecting an Ericsson Webswitch 100 to asterisk. Has anyone gotten a Webswitch running? When I try to connect asterisk thinks everything works fine, while the webswitch just rings. I belive chan_h323 is picking the wrong port to talk at the webswitch on, however I'm not sure, nor am I sure how to fix it. Any clues/hints? A tcpdump is attached to show the session.

We have a Zenoss server in our main office monitoring (among many other things) an Apache server in a remote network, with a Tinc link between the two networks. The monitoring simply involves making an HTTP request to a URL once every 5 minutes and confirming that a response page comes back. Most of the requests to this particular web server succeed (and similar requests to other web servers