Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "NAT/SIP solution?"
2003 Jun 30
2
A solution for SIP and NAT
Hi all.
I have come to the conclusion that there just isn't anything out there
for allowing SIP and NAT to work together nicely. This is rather amazing
considering that as far back as March 2000 there are documents
describing how to do it.
So I've started a really simple SIP and RTP proxy project, SaRP, on
sourceforge.net. Yesterday we uploaded 0.2 of the perl based release.
This is the
2003 Oct 14
1
Iaxtel and Voicepulse
I'm having trouble configuring these services the way I want. Basically I
prefer using iLBC before GSM, however Iaxtel only want to talk GSM. It
_seems_ that Voicepulse prefers GSM also, because even if I put ILBC before
GSM in the "allow=" part of iax.conf, if GSM is mentioned, Voicepulse will
use it. If I don't allow GSM Voicepulse will use ILBC.
Does anyone know how to
2004 Sep 28
1
Codecs and negotiations
For some reason I now seem unable to control which codec is chosen. The
problem happens with outgoing calls to Stanaphone. Even if I chose
disallow=all and allow=ulaw as the only codecs it connects with GSM.
Has anyone else got problems with these settings? Any suggestions? As I
recalled it, such a setup would not establish a call if the ulaw-codec
was not offered by the provider. Stanaphone has
2004 May 28
1
Immortal SIP & NAT problem
Hi guies,
I know I know this subject have been The most written subject about VoIP
Right... but I just want to make clear, just one time !
If Asterisk is on a Public IP Address and a softphone behind the nat,
sip.conf must contains for this phone: nat=yes ....
Now if I want to configure my sipphone (X-Lite) placing behing the NAT,
it must have in "Domain/Realm" the external IP
2010 Oct 15
3
SIP - no audio behind nat problem
Hello,
We have 2 grandstream GX 2000 phones behind NAT and Asterisk outside this
natted network.
We have the issue with calls to these SIP phones - no audio.
It is probably the problem with port forwarding on router - but I am not
sure how can I forward same sip ports (5004 to 5100) to two phones (nat
addresses?)?
Any help appreciated!
Z. Zivanovic
-------------- next part
2012 Mar 24
1
icy-metaint in header and in stream data
Normally icy-metaint is a line in the http header, but some stream only
sends it in the response data is self.
Where can I find such a stream?
Is that compliant to the standard?
Implementation that also parses the response data
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8621353/textview-not-updating-shoutcast-stream-metadata-in-android-2-2
Thank
Stig
--
Best Regards / Mvh
Stig Christensen
stig
2003 May 06
1
Using ICH for outbound when * is behind NAT
I have recently set to * to play with and I'm getting the hang of it..
I've seen various posts about problems where the SIP clients are behind
NAT but I anted to ask a slightly different question.
At the current CVS can the * SIP client register with a SIP provider
(such as ICH) when the * box itself is behind a NAT. I have an ICH
account which I can configure fine on an ATA 186 using
2009 May 09
2
Recover files from overwritten zpool?
To make a long story short, after a Solaris reinstall I needed to access
a disk from the previous install. I realize now I should have done a
zpool import, but instead I recreated the pool, thinking this would
bring my file system back. I destroyed the new pool, but other than that
I have done nothing to overwrite data.
Is it possible to recover the data from the old pool?
--Stig
2004 Dec 14
1
Asterisk to sip client behind Firewall/NAT - cancall but cannot receive calls ?
Check your FW-1 tracker and see if any sip packets are dropped during
call initiation.
I had this problem and it went away when I upgraded the BT's firmware to
the latest (16).
Beware, though, that people on the list claim that this firmware breaks
functionality of the message button and autoanswer.
I haven't checked this yet, cause I can't afford to go back a version.
I prefer a
2003 Dec 01
8
VoiceGlo
Hi,
VoiceGlo is comercial version of Asterisk? :))) loooooooooollllllllllllllllllll
Take a loock on http://www.voiceglo.com/
The softphone is IAX :)
Best regards,
Chris HARIGA
Techselesta Inc.
http://www.techselesta.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20031201/307c10e9/attachment.htm
2003 Dec 18
8
asterisk behind NAT
I know this issue has been covered with at least 2 different patches, and
probably a dozen different discussions, however I'm a bit unclear as to what
my options are.
I have a DSL line coming in with 8 IP addresses going to an OpenBSD firewall
doing 1:1 NAT for machines behind the firewall. My asterisk box is one of
these machines, and I'd like to allow foreign SIP clients
2005 Oct 28
3
Beta-announcement - xenConsole for your Xen
Hello all,
I''ve been running Xen 2.0x for some few months and have written a
simple top(1)-like tool - xenConsole - which continously displays all
running domains, along with their CPU-consumption, load averages,
percentual CPU-/memory-usage, domain uptimes and so forth.
A screenshot probably explains it better than me:
http://www.gothix.dk/xenConsole/xcon-0.10b1-ok.PNG
It requires
2014 Dec 04
3
DoD approval of Centos Was RE: Firefox fails to authenticate .mil sites with New DoDCAC
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Ricles
> Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 11:23
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Firefox fails to authenticate .mil
> sites with New DoDCAC
>
> I thought DoD used RHEL and not Centos, or did Centos did approved
> DADEMS recently?
DADMS is a Navy system, but yes Centos is approved for use by DISA. You would
2002 Apr 23
1
problem with X11 forwarding and use_localhost on Linux (solution)
On Linux (and others that define DONT_TRY_OTHER_AF)
x11_create_display_inet() will only use the first entry returned by
getaddrinfo(). When binding sockets to "ANY" this is fine on Linux
since a PF_INET6 socket bound to ANY will also include IPv4. However
when x11_use_localhost (X11UseLocalhost) is set, this is a problem.
getaddrinfo() will then return an AF_INET6 entry with IPv6 address
2010 Nov 16
4
DBLEPR?
Ravi Varadhan and I have been looking at UCMINF to try to identify why it gives occasional
(but not reproducible) errors, seemingly on Windows only. There is some suspicion that its
use of DBLEPR for finessing the Fortran WRITE() statements may be to blame. While I can
find DBLEPR in Venables and Ripley, it doesn't get much mention after about 2000 in the
archives, though it is in the R FAQ
2010 Nov 16
4
DBLEPR?
Ravi Varadhan and I have been looking at UCMINF to try to identify why it gives occasional
(but not reproducible) errors, seemingly on Windows only. There is some suspicion that its
use of DBLEPR for finessing the Fortran WRITE() statements may be to blame. While I can
find DBLEPR in Venables and Ripley, it doesn't get much mention after about 2000 in the
archives, though it is in the R FAQ
2004 Jun 16
5
Failed to authenticate on INVITE
Hi,
I upgraded my two asterisk boxes today to the latest cvs (up from 5/3/04).
These two boxes talk to eachother via sip, not iax. Since the upgrade, I
get the error "Failed to authenticate on INVITE" trying to make calls to/from
either box. Removing the secret from each box's sip config seems to work but
is utterly braindead.
Has anyone seen this?
- Eric
2012 Sep 26
2
non-differentiable evaluation points in nlminb(), follow-up of PR#15052
This is a follow-up question for PR#15052
<http://bugs.r-project.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15052>
There is another thing I would like to discuss wrt how nlminb() should
proceed with NAs. The question is: What would be a successful way to
deal with an evaluation point of the objective function where the
gradient and the hessian are not well defined?
If the gradient and the hessian both
2014 Dec 04
1
DoD approval of Centos Was RE: Firefox fails to authenticate .mil sites with New DoDCAC
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Ricles
> Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 11:42
>
> Gotcha, I also work with DoD for Navy systems and was surprised by
> that. So you mean if we don't want to pay RHEL licensing fees, we can
> use Centos? Since we are paying about $100 per RHEL license.
But you will still need a (self?) support plan to be STIG compliant.
>
2015 Apr 22
6
SIG - Hardening
Dear All,
About a week ago; I posted a proposal over on the centos-devel mailing
list, the proposal is for a SIG 'CentOS hardening', there were a few of
the members of the community who are also interested in this. Therefore,
I am extending that email to this community; where there is a larger
community.
Some things that we will like to achieve are as follows:
SSH:
disable root