similar to: G729 experiences.. (fwd)

All, seems I too am suffering from posts to the list and being accused of SPAMing .... -----Original Message----- From: AntiSpam UOL [mailto:andersoncbr.sspam@uol.com.br] Sent: 26 September 2003 20:48 To: alow@prioritytelecom.com Subject: RE:RE: [Asterisk-Users] RTP routing.. <http://antispam.uol.com.br> <http://mail.i.uol.com.br/tirateima_txt.gif>

Thanks, annoying but only course of action I guess ... (c; > -----Original Message----- > From: WipeOut [mailto:wipe_out@lycos.co.uk] > Sent: 29 September 2003 10:36 > To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] RE: Asterisk list a SPAMer > (uol.com.br), I think not ... > > > Just add a filter to your mail client to delete all mail from >

Every time I send an e-mail to the * list, I receive this "AntiSpam UOL" E-mail. is anybody else experiencing the same? How can I get rid of it? Uriel -----Original Message----- From: AntiSpam UOL [mailto:andersoncbr.sspam@uol.com.br] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 11:51 PM To: uriel@adelphia.net Subject: RE:RE: [Asterisk-Users] SIP / GrandStream Configuration Ol?,

----- Mensagem Original -----=20 Eu boicotaria estas empresas s=F3 pelo fato de financiarem os enjoativos e = rancentos Cassetas, mas me surpreendi ao descobrir que tantos produtos que = eu costumo comprar s=E3o transg=EAnicos. Fui conferir no site do greenpeace= e =E9 verdade!!!!!!!!!!!!! Boicote neles! ----- Original Message -----=20 C A M P A N H A=20 N A T A L S E M B A I X A R I A

I hate to post HTML to the list, but I refuse to respond to this, and I would like to say that whomever is using this service is kinda stupid for subscribing an email address to the list using this service. I hope they learn a lesson by us, the list users, NOT responding to this, and eventually, after not receiving any list mail, they?ll wonder ?hmm why is this list so dead?? Just my .02.

List Mom/Dad, could you please find in the list of subscribers the person that is getting mail at uol.com.br or something similar and smack them for having broken Anti-Spam software ?? I'd be happy to see them just be removed until they fix it. cheers ----- Forwarded message from AntiSpam UOL <andersoncbr.sspam@uol.com.br> ----- Delivered-To: jmbrown@chagresventures.com Date:

Dear sirs Thank you and congratulations for creating Dovecot. When a message header is split along several lines, it seems only the first one is parsed by sieve. The following header: From: "=?iso-8859-1?Q?Cotiatododia=20-=20O=20Jornal=20de=20Not=EDcias=20a=20Se?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?rvi=E7o=20de=20Cotia=20e=20Regi=E3o=2E?=" <newsletter at cotiatododia.com.br> was not discarded

Hi All. I'am using Asterisk with SER. I can make call between two internal VoIP gateways or from na internal to external VoIP gateway. But when I get a external call, this call hang ups 5 seconds after and I reveive the following messages *CLI> -- Executing Dial("SIP/16008-3d17", "SIP/16007&SIP/16006|20|tr") in new stack -- Called 16007 -- Called 16006

As others have said, everything I post to asterisk users, I get this anti-spam HTML saying please authenicate. This email indicates it's on behalf of andersoncbr@uol.com.br Can we please remove this person from the list. thanks, Adam

All my shorewall files have a coment at last line: "#LAST LINE ... DO NOT REMOVE" But not common.def. Is this file corrupt? F. __________________________________________________________________________ Encontre sempre uma linha desocupada com o Discador BOL! http://www.bol.com.br/discador Ainda n=E3o tem AcessoBOL? Assine j=E1! http://www.bol.com.br/acessobol

My logs show thats: A internal client search my proxy (192.168.0.3) Oct 12 12:40:33 massayo kernel: Shorewall:all2all:REJECT:IN=3Deth1 OUT=3D MAC=3D00:e0:7d:82:0f:fe:00:04:75:99:28:63:08:00 SRC=3D192.168.0.215 DST=3D192.168.0.3 LEN=3D63 TOS=3D0x00 PREC=3D0x00 TTL=3D128 ID=3D25902 PROTO=3DUDP SPT=3D3028 DPT=3D53 LEN=3D43 Why OUT is empty? From: Server (DMZ) Oct 12 12:40:34 massayo kernel:

Hi, I just install Mandrake Linux 9.0 and it use shorewall. My first impression are extremily positive. But I simply can''t ping outside my machine. I verify that my route table is ok. It just cant''t ping in the same network! :( Any sugestions? # iptables -L | grep icmp ACCEPT icmp -- anywhere anywhere state NEW,RELATED,ESTABLISHED ACCEPT icmp

at least once a week I receive such an attack coming from a different ip. I will read the articles. Thanks again to everyone. Regards, Rodrigo Lang. 2010/6/29 Kenny Watson <kwatson at geniusgroupltd.com> > Hi, you can use fail2ban >

Hi everyone! I need to create a rule that return back the packages sender. For example, if the IP 200.xxx.xxx.xxx tries to connect to my firewall in one specific port, the rules turns back the connection to 200.xxx.xxx.xxx. With this rule the Engineers Department will test some equipments with GSM chips. One point to observe is that we don''t know witch IP will connect to this rules.

However.... When I try the command nmblookup -M LINUXSERVER querying TESTGROUP on 192.168.255.255 name_query failed to find name TESTGROUP #1d My /etc/hosts file is # Do not remove the following line, or various programs # that require network functionality will fail. 127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain 192.168.100.101 testpc 192.168.100.100 linuxserver /etc/samba/lmhosts is 127.0.0.1

When I run smbclient 1. smbclient //LINUX01//homes -U test password is requested, I enter the password, and I get in 2. smbclient //LINUX01//homes -U Jane password is requested, I enter the password, and I cannot get in (ERRSV - ERRbadpw (Bad Password - name/password pair in a Tree Connect or Session Setup are invalid) 3. smbclient

Please note that Windows 9x clients are not true members of a domain for reasons outlined in this article. Therefore the protocol for support Windows 9x style domain logons is completely different from NT4 domain logons and has been officially supported for some time. Did you read this document? Let me know what needs to be updated and i will take care of it. Cheers, jerry

Hello list. I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even without modifications. How did I try it? Created a (non-root) build environment (not a mock ) Installed the kernel.scr.rpm and did a rpmbuild -ba --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log | tee prep-out.log The build failed at the end: Processing files: kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL Checking