similar to: RES: RTP routing..

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "RES: RTP routing.."

2003 Sep 26
4
RTP routing..
Here is a question for all you routing guru's out there.. I am using an ADSL line (512/256Kbps) to connect from the internet to my Asterisk server.. At a point I will run out of bandwidth so the cheapest option would be to add a second ADSL line.. The problem is how will the routing work? If I put 2 IP's on one NIC will the return traffice be routed back via the gatway of the IP that
2003 Jul 28
8
RTP session traversing Asterisk server ...
I've been reading up on the SIP and related (SDP/RTP) RFC's and as I would expect the RTP session should ideally be between the two end points of the call, in my case the AS5300 and the 7940 which are connected on the same VLAN as the Asterisk server. When I sniff the packets on the VLAN I find that all RTP packets are being relayed by the Asterisk server causing increased load on the
2006 Dec 22
2
System Application with java
Hi, I created a script named example2.sh which goal is read some text from my HP Service Desk using an application in java and send this text to the text2wave application for TTS. example2.sh java -Xbatch Example10 | text2wave -f 8000 -o /var/lib/asterisk/sounds/my-sd.wav When I execute the script in prompt, everything is ok, but when I use the system() command in my extensions.conf it isn?t
2003 Jul 30
5
chan_sip.c problems problems from cvs 1.134
All, I've found problems in my setup with the latest couple of revisions (1.135/1.136) of asterisk/channels/chan_sip.c In my setup I have a RH9 asterisk server, AS5300 (single E1 to PSTN) and a dozen 7940's, everything is in the same VLAN and only running SIP. Outbound calls work fine: 7940 -SIP-> Asterisk -SIP-> AS5300 But inbound calls fail, I see the initial INVITE from the
2003 Sep 29
1
RE: Asterisk list a SPAMer (uol.com.br), I think not ...
All, seems I too am suffering from posts to the list and being accused of SPAMing .... -----Original Message----- From: AntiSpam UOL [mailto:andersoncbr.sspam@uol.com.br] Sent: 26 September 2003 20:48 To: alow@prioritytelecom.com Subject: RE:RE: [Asterisk-Users] RTP routing.. <http://antispam.uol.com.br> <http://mail.i.uol.com.br/tirateima_txt.gif>
2003 Oct 15
4
indications.conf
Hi, I?m trying to make * work with Brazilian analog signalling.. I?m using the following in indications.conf file... [br] description = Brasil ringcadence = 1000,4000 dial = 425 busy = 425/250,0/250 ring = 425/1000,0/4000 callwaiting = 425/60,0/250,425/60,0/5000 I changed zaptel.conf to loadzone=br #loadzone=fr #loadzone=de #loadzone=uk #loadzone=fi #loadzone=jp #loadzone=sp #loadzone=no
2003 Jul 17
7
Help Needed
Hi Everybody, I am new to Asterisk. Can anybody suggest me some link where I can find architecture level detail of this system. My aim is to find out how easy it is to port it on a new hardware (T1/E1 and POTS)? Any input is highly appreciated. Regards Arun
2003 Aug 12
1
Malicious Call Trace
All, Has anyone had any thoughts/discussion on providing a malicious call trace feature within Asterisk. Most legacy PBX's support this feature which allows a handset user to indicate using DTMF during a call that it's a malicious call which instructs the PBX to send a specific Q931 message over the ISDN to the providers switch telling it to log the call details as malicious for later
2003 Sep 04
4
update re. Grandstream + SIP + Echo problems ..
well .. good news :) i've just put in txgain=1.0 rxgain=1.0 in my zapata.conf and upgraded the Grandstream Budgettones i'm using to version 81 of the software and all seems fine .. there is still an echo but after the first couple of seconds of call it vanishes, as the echocancelling kicks in .. so far my client is happy :) now .. i have one slight problem left .. although most of my
2004 Sep 22
1
'asterisk' displayed on my Cisco 7960 & 7912 ...
The problem is some calls from the PSTN have hidden caller id so if you want to change it to something else then modify chan_sip.c #define CALLERID_UNKNOWN "Asterisk" I've changed mine to: #define CALLERID_UNKNOWN "Unknown" -----Original Message----- From: Shaun Ewing [mailto:sewing@gmail.com] Sent: 22 September 2004 14:16 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List
2013 Feb 03
2
RTP timeout if the asterisk box behind NAT
Dears; I am facing a problem in disconnecting the calls, it is related to the rtptimeout (disconnecting if there is no RTP packets from both sides). My Asterisk Box is behind NAT but there is a static real IP address at the ADSL router. We call from the Mobile to the PSTN analogue numbers which are connected to Asterisk Analogue card (the telephone lines are analoge), and then we dial the
2003 Apr 23
6
OT: Multiple SIP phones behind NAT gateway?
Hi, I know this is slightly off topic but I figured the knowlege here is probably the best on the subject.. I want to setup remote offices with 4 to 6 SIP phones (SNOM 200) using ADSL and the internet to connect to the Asterisk box.. These phone will be behind an ADSL router using NAT... I don't want to setup another Asterisk system in each office so IAX is not an option.. I could use
2004 Jan 20
2
Re-Invite between SIP phones
Anybody knows what do I need to tell Asterisk to issue a re-INVITE between two SIP phone to avoid having the media going through the server? Tks, Al __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus
2003 Jul 29
3
stupid questions ..
just three "stupid" questions I need to ask .. 1. what's the sequence to press on a SIP phone to transfer a call to another extension. 2. what's the same thing if you want to hold an incoming call, speak to the other extension, then pass the call? 3. what's the extensions.conf syntax to dial two SIP extensions at once? many thanks Dave
2005 May 16
1
A hook flash sent using RTP for telephony signals (RFC2833) does not flash zap channel
I just registered ID 0004283 at http://bugs.digium.com for the problem described in subject (found when using a Linksys PAP2-NA). I don't know where the proper forum is to discuss, so I'm hoping anyone interested will read the bug and let me know your thoughts, either at bugs.digium.com, here, or by emailing me directly (or, please suggest another forum that is more appropriate). As
2003 Aug 22
5
DTMF tones not long enough on out going call s
Maybe its just me but I find this question a little confusing, the tone duration should have no impact on tone recognition and typically in my experience the duration of the tone is defined by how long the user holds down the button !? > -----Original Message----- > From: James Sizemore [mailto:james@deny.org] > Sent: 22 August 2003 17:33 > To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com >
2003 Nov 27
13
Asterisk behind NAT << How to do it.
Thanks to ww and his patch on bug #104, I have successfully implemented Asterisk behind NAT without using STUN or anything crazy. It's quite straight forward. Until this gets tested enough and put into CVS, you will have to patch your chan_sip.c file to do this. I'm sure within the next few days this will get put merged into CVS if no one finds any problems. I tried this on chan_sip.c
2005 Mar 03
2
Asterisk + SIP + NAT - seriously, what's the secret?
I'm at my wit's end! I've spent 2 days now trying to get what I thought was a very simply SIP + NAT arrangement working. I've trawled the web and picked brains, but nothing anyone suggests work. My setup is very simple. I have a * server in a datacentre, with a public IP address. There is no firewall in place, it's completely open (at least, as far as I'm concerned). I
2004 Jan 30
3
P2P RTP without SIP re-invites
I'm confronted with an issue that I am sure many others are too with Asterisk and scalability. I'd like to be able to build a cluster of Asterisk boxes to handle a large volume of simultaneous calls but have the feeling that the hardware requirements to handle large volumes of RTP streams would be too vast. So with that assumption I imagine a platform that would not get involved with the
2003 Jun 20
1
Firewalling, Ports and rtp.conf..
Hi, Am I correct in this.. I want to setup IPTABLES to protect my * box.. The default rtp.conf defines that * will use ports 10000 to 20000.. IAX listens on 5036.. SIP listens on 5060.. I am assuming all ports used by * are UDP.. So I am planning on setting my server to block all inbound traffic except UDP ports 5060, 5036 and 10000-20000.. Am I leaving anything out?? Thanks.. --