Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "Ser vs Asterisk?"
2003 Sep 12
5
Asterisk using a h323 gateway
Hello:
I am testing Asterisk with oh323.
My question is: can Asterisk route some calls thru a second h323 gateway (a
h323 <-> PSTN gw)?
- Asterisk ip: 192.168.1.10
- h323<->PSTN gw: 192.168.1.20
I've tried:
exten => _9XXXXXXXX,1,Dial(OH323/192.1.1.20)
or
exten => _9XXXXXXXX,1,Dial(OH323/BYEXTENSION@192.1.1.20)
but it does not work at all.
If my h323 client
2003 Oct 14
3
*/SER/FW
Hi,
I've just read the postings regarding the interworking between * and SER.
As these persons seem quite knowledgeable on this, I would like to have
their advise on my planned installation:
- I have broadband cable access
- I plan to install a SIP-aware router
- I plan to install a Linux server with Digium analog IF card(s) for
connection to my analog line (incoming and outgoing)
- I plan
2003 Sep 16
10
call center design question
Would like to deploy * in a small help desk environment (five to ten
people) using call queues and some sort of CTI interface to pop Remedy
screen data in front of the help desk person receiving the call. Data
to be popped would be based on CallerID.
Anyone doing something similar?
Anyone interfacing to an external Remedy system?
Any reference sites that I could read/learn more of the
2005 Jun 20
2
Asterisk does not function without a DNS ser ver
> We have our Asterisk server running smoothly with a SIP BRI gateway
> for inbound calls. However if the Internet connection goes down and a
> DNS server becomes unreachable Asterisk basically does not function.
> By this I mean it does not answer call coming in from the gateway
> (which is on the local LAN) and you can't even reload it - just hangs
> there. If I change the
2007 May 19
2
Ser vs. DUNDi
With all of the recent talk on the list about DUNDi, I have a question. From
the outset it appears that SER is often used for high availability solutions
and as a tool for almost clustering Asterisk boxes behind it. It appears to
me that DUNDi is providing a lot of this as well. Now I know DUNDi is not an
application by itself to proxy SIP requests but can I hear any information
out there that
2004 Jul 15
3
SIP to H323 call timeout
Hi all,
I have the following setup:
UAs ------------SER ------------------------ ASTERISK
---------------------GNUGK --------------- GWs
SER is configured to route call requests from UAs to Asterisk. Asterisk is
configured to receive the call on SIP channel and dial out to GNUGK over
H323 channel. The problem I'm facing is that asterisk sends out the call
request to GNUGK and times out
2004 Mar 31
2
SER Asterisk problem
Hi All.
I'am using Asterisk with SER. I can make call between two internal VoIP
gateways or from na internal to external VoIP gateway. But when I get a
external call, this call hang ups 5 seconds after and I reveive the
following messages
*CLI> -- Executing Dial("SIP/16008-3d17",
"SIP/16007&SIP/16006|20|tr") in new stack
-- Called 16007
-- Called 16006
2004 Dec 16
3
Cisco 7960 (SIP) hold problems
Has anyone had problems with using hold on a 7960 SIP firmware? The
problem is when the 7960 puts a call on hold and you take it off hold
again, the 7960 outbound audio is delayed on the other end. Sometimes up
to a few seconds. I've tried a couple different things, making the
"other end" a diff type of trunk ie:
7960sip --> asterisk --> IAX2 --> PRI
7960sip -->
2004 Oct 04
2
Somebody using AS5350 CISCO?
Do somebody using CISCO AS5350 with Asterisk?
Which protocol do you using: H323, MGCP, SIP?
This direction: [12sp->Asterisk->h323->as5350->isdnPSTN] is ok
But reverse: [isdnPSTN->as5350->h323->Asterisk->12sp] cannot hear 12sp, but 12sp hear PSTN (codec g711u)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
2006 Feb 12
6
Best quad-port fxo solution with EC?
Hello All,
I am trying to figure out which way to go for a quad port fxo solution
with a good echo can on it. My options are the sangoma remora, a
mediatrix fxo, or something similar.
The issue is that I would need a good EC. This would be on about a 9000
foot loop, and the lines don't function well on a spa-3000 or zaptel tdm
4 port card.
Anyone have experience that drives them in a
2005 Aug 08
1
Call forward & SER as SIP router
Hi,
I'm trying to transfer an incoming call from the PSTN to another PSTN number through a SER - Asterisk system. SER doing only routing..
pstn call-> SER -> asterisk (call forward) -> SER -> pstn
Logic for SER: If something comes from the pstn, send it to asterisk. If something comes from asterisk, send it to the pstn.
Every time I am getting a "Got SIP response 481
2005 Feb 08
1
SER Interaction: Agents and Extensions
Hey gang,
I'm trying to work out all possible scenarios using SER & Asterisk in our
upcomming deployment. The example scenario is 50 different customers, all
with different numbers of SIP UAs. All UAs would register with SER; This
will help keep any inter-office conversations off our bandwidth since SER
doesn't handle the RTP stream.
Calls from PSTN to UA are easy to handle.
2004 May 25
1
Using Ser and Asterisk together
Hi all,
I would like to know if it is possible to use asterisk
and ser together in a single computer system using ser
as a sip proxy and forwarding any voice call request
to asterisk for calling into the pstn gateway. (or any
other alternative that is possible is also welcomed
for suggestions). If it is possible can someone kindly
show me the necessary configuration files or refer me
to any page
2004 Apr 21
2
Ser and Asterisk together
Anybody out there use Ser along with *? Any advantages disadvantages? Is
this even a good idea?
2005 Mar 16
1
Re: [Serusers] ser+asterisk - security
Do some reading about contexts in *. Basically, you want all "public" sip requests to land in a dialplan context that has no access to PSTN, and requests from your own SER box(es) to land in another context (that DOES have access to PSTN).
You can achieve this by adding an entry to your sip.conf for your SER box with it's IP address (and context) specified.
----- Original
2004 Sep 20
6
SER + Asterisk
Hi there,
I've seen people using SER with Asterisk. I took a look at SER
website, and I didn't see the point in using it, since Asterisk
already handles SIP very well (apparently, at least).
But, as I'm starting, and some of you (more experienced) use it, I
know that there's something there... So I would like to know why to
use SER. Is it because of scalability, performance,
2004 Jan 15
1
SER & Asterisk
Hi,
I'm trying to bundle the powers of Asterisk and SER.
Asterisk for pabx functionalities and termination to landline/PSTN, and
SER as SIP Gateway/Proxy.
With my current configuration the SIP user just adds 0 as a prefix to a
number, and the call will go out to PSTN over Asterisk.
For this to work I added the rewritehostport() function in SER to
point to the Asterisk IP (different from the
2005 Aug 19
1
Nat + Asterisk + Ser (Far end Nat Traversal)
Hello,
I have several * servers behind a SER server (in a local ip range). The
SER server is also publicy reachable. On the other site, I have SIP
clients that are behind another NAT or in the same NAT range as the *
server. Can someone give me some directions/hints etc. on how to make
this work. I think I should be using MediaProxy with SER. But do the SIP
clients need to register at the SER
2004 Aug 12
9
Asterisk and SER
Why is it that the wiki indirectly recommends SER (or another proxy) out in front of Asterisk. If Asterisk can use radius, and provide the rest of AAA they why ? Incidentall\y, I'm not familiar with network configuration really, although I do understand most of the basics.
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version:
2003 Sep 17
1
Re: Asterisk-Users digest, Vol 1 #1279 - 16 msgs
----- Original Message -----
From: <asterisk-users-request@lists.digium.com>
To: <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com>
Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2003 7:55 PM
Subject: Asterisk-Users digest, Vol 1 #1279 - 16 msgs
> Send Asterisk-Users mailing list submissions to
> asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>