similar to: Problems with TDM40P

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "Problems with TDM40P"

2003 Sep 23
3
Port problem
Hi All, I have an equipment loaded with 4 X100P (numbered 1-4)) and one T400P (numbered 5-8). Everything works fine except that I cannot use one of the FXS ports (number 5). If I configure zapata.conf to recognize it, the whole system voice quality suffers. I've tried already to switch PCI slots, with no results. Below is a snapshot of my /proc/interrupts, maybe this can shed some light on
2006 Feb 14
3
consult about Digium Card
Hi All, I Have a Digium Card TDM40P, the specification say: OEM TDM40B: TDM400P + 4 PORT FXS Bundle, my question is: Can I to install analog lines of PTSN?, other detail is: this card have 4 card green. I need to know what is the best card for the following scenario: I need a IVR for my comapny and a PBX, but i want that my extension not use FXS I want IP phone . Thanks ins advanced,
2007 Sep 05
2
No Dial tone came from fxs modules
Hi: I have asterisk-1.4.0 with zaptel 1.4.0 and TDM40P on my server ,when i made modprobe wctdm the fxs modules is lightened but there is no dial tone came from it . Can i get some help please. Best Regards; Wassim _________________________________________________________________ Windows Live Spaces is here! It?s easy to create your own personal Web site. http://spaces.live.com/signup.aspx
2003 Jun 09
2
Underwater in 10 - 20 seconds
I'm running a X100P connected to a POTS line and a TDMP400P w/ two FXS daughter cards. Both calling out from one of the FXS phones (internally) or calling my home number (externally) the FXO card starts to freak out. By freak out I mean I can still hear but it sounds like you are underwater, there is an annoying hiss or buzz on the line as well. If I hang up and pick up another house phone
2014 Aug 10
1
High Frequency Hiss with Opus at 48 kbit/s
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi to everybody. First of all I hope this is the right place to discuss such an (nitpicky) issue. I've just been testing the current Opus release and for mere curiosity compared its performance to WMAPro with CD quality music at low bitrates (48 kbit/s). While Opus generally does a very good job, I found one particular example (a high pitched
2001 Aug 14
1
udial.wav problem
I was doing some testing with RC2 and I noticed that RC2 doesn't encode past 19kHz with this clip (-b256 and -b350). There are no problems with this clip like it was before, but this clip contains signal past 19kHz which is audible as a faint high-frequency hiss - and that hiss is gone in the encoded file since RC2 cuts off at 19kHz. I think that -b256 and -b350 should encode at least up to
2004 Aug 06
2
Way to measure loss of quality
2 things, first an idea... next a question. QUALITY MEASUREMENT IDEA: I find it difficult to hear 2 voice samples and tell which is nearer the original, especially if the background hiss is slightly different. So what if you actually subtract the post-compression sound from the original and then listen to the DIFFERENCE. If you can't hear any voice except background noise and some hiss from
2004 Sep 06
1
added background noise problem?
Using narrow, wideband, and ultra-wideband encoding on a short 16khz wav gave .spx's of 3,789 ... 2,935 ... and 1,875 bytes. Even after reading the manual, smaller files for the higher frequency encoding seems counter-intuitive. My mp3 at 32 kbps on the original 22khz wav is 3,866 with a quality comparable to speex wideband on the converted 16khz wav, so speex is a 24% improvement in size.
2005 Mar 02
1
General pre-processing prior to feeding sound to speex.
Hi, I have speex running as a part of a voice conferencing app. Well, one under development anyway. I'm running VBR at quality 3 and get a "hissy-squelchy" background noise. This is fine, kinda, because the internal microphone in the laptop picks up hiss, the sound of the (actually very quiet) hard drive and generally speaking is of less than exemplary quality. To help
2004 Aug 06
1
Way to measure loss of quality
I think you misunderstood my quality measurement idea. I mean if you subtract the original and the one after, the LESS voice that is less over or the LESS you can tell when someone is speaking, the better the compression. This is still subjective but I think its easier to tell this way because its easier to tell how much voice is remaining than to tell how much the compressed voice is missing from
2001 Jul 14
3
Some very early RC1 results
Hi all, I started testing the RC1 encoder at ftp://sjeng.sourceforge.net/pub/sjeng/oggdrop.exe (based on branch_monty_20010708) On the songs I have tested so far (not much :) I did not hear any stereo issues, but there are some very noticeable problems with the produced files. Songs without much high-end will suddenly have one when encoded. (you'd expect it the other way around) It
2006 May 23
2
Are my expectations too high?
I'm trying to use Asterisk with a TDM400P and 2 analog lines, but I'm having a hard time getting the kind of audio quality that I'd like. I'm hoping to be able to use SIP phones to make calls through Asterisk and have the same quality as a regular analog phone connected to the PSTN. Are my expectations too high? Is it that once I'm using Asterisk as a gateway to the PSTN, I
2004 Apr 01
1
Just static on TDM400P (not even a dialtone)
Hi, I have just built my home Asterisk box into a better PC that became available (still only a P2 350 but it only has to manage 1 analog line).. Anyway I have built it on Fedora Core 1.. I have an X100P and a TDM400P (1 module installed).. These cards were working fine in my older PC that was running my Asterisk at home.. The inbound calls via the X100P to my sip phones are working great..
2004 Dec 29
1
Strange speex behaviour
Hi, After trying to use the prebuilt Windows 1.1.6 binaries I've founded that the DLL version doesn't export the mode variables properly, this could probably easily be fixed. Anyways, as for now I've downloaded the 1.1.6 source and built it myself and I'm linking speex statically to my application. I've written an experimental software which just packs 20 ms frames and sends
2011 Apr 20
8
Bug in PCI Passthrough
Hello all I tried to enable PCI Passthrough in my Debian Squeeze installation. Unfortunately, it didnt work. The following bug showed up (excerpt from dmesg): [ 10.148612] uhci_hcd 0000:00:14.2: PCI INT D -> Link[LNKD] -> GSI 11 (level, low) -> IRQ 11 [ 4.678352] Failed to setup GSI :11, err_code:-22 [ 4.678480] dmfe 0000:00:0e.0: PCI INT A -> Link[LNKB] -> GSI 11 (level, low)
2003 Sep 03
8
Asterisk Jitters
Hi, Every time I dial into my asterisk box i hear nothing but asterisk jittering. The following is an example of what I get on the asterisk CLI Thanks *CLI> DEBUG[81926]: File chan_sip.c, Line 3826 (check_user): Setting NAT on RTP to 0 DEBUG[81926]: File chan_sip.c, Line 4807 (handle_request): Check for res DEBUG[81926]: File chan_sip.c, Line 952 (find_user): Call from user
2008 Apr 03
1
rtc issue
Hi all, I have installed centos 5.1 x86_64. 2.6.18-53.1.14.el5 Everything seems to be working fine except that the rtc module is not working. cat /proc/interrupts shows: CPU0 CPU1 0: 129 0 XT-PIC-XT timer 1: 330797 0 XT-PIC-XT i8042 2: 0 0 XT-PIC-XT cascade 3: 4 0
2009 Jun 16
2
tdm loosing interrupts and latency
Hi I have come across a problem, with my tdp410 and soekris board (basically pc on a chip amd geode cpu). I am using the box as a firewall/asterisk box. The problem occurs when I drop ppp and I get dead loop dectiotn going, I seem to lose interrupts and get lots of messages in syslog from wctdm24xx saying missed interrupt increasing latency its out lined here
2005 Mar 22
6
IRQ headaches
Excuse my ignorance here, but I am desperately trying to isolate the IRQ for my TE110P card (shown below as t1xxp) Ive gone into my bios and disabled all usb , parallel, serial and some other devices, those that I needed to keep, I have moved off of IRQ 10 and onto IRQ 5, but everytime I boot up, I get usb-uhci and ehci_hcd using IRQ 10 as well as my Digium card. Does anybody know what these are
2004 May 03
2
Number of Digium cards in one box...
I know, I know, check the archives but I can't find an answer since the new cards are well, NEW! I understand the whole issue of expandability and flexibility of using a T1 card and an Adtran 750. FXO or FXS, you mix and match. With the new card offerings from Digium I can easily put a 4CO by 8 Station system together. Barring the extra interrupts, extra CPU Cycles of extra interfaces, is