similar to: Working: TFTPd for NAT'd Cisco 7960 and ATA-186

Hi I am trying to your wine with sipXecs. We are testing Cisco ATA-186. When we attempt to update the ATA software via sipX we send a text file to the sipX server but it needs to be convert from a text file into a binary via the cfgfmt.exe tool I installed sipX and wine on the same box and used wine config tool to point or grab the tool. Wine puts it or a copy of it in the system32 folder.

Here is my setup: * is on a NAT'd subnet, but also has an externally routable IP address. I have a Snom360 that's external to this and behind NAT. The Snom360 can call other phones in * subnet (by their internal extension numbers) and voice is transmitted fine; however, when I attempt to check voicemail (or any * voice recordings for that matter) I can't hear them. The phone just

Hey all, quick question: I have a server running Samba 2.2.3a which has two NAT'd private domains behind it (192.168.1.0/24 and 192.168.88.0/24). The .88.0 subdomain has a wireless AP/router on it (192.168.88.254) which also does NAT (the wireless machines are on 192.168.92.0/24). The router has the IP of the second internal NIC as its gateway; the wireless machines have the

Hi, I have the following setup: Asterisk <-> Nat <-> Internet <-> Nat <-> 2 x SIP endpoints With directmedia=no I can make a call between the two SIP endpoints; the RTP stream being passed through the Asterisk box. Obviously, this is sub-optimal. I attempted to enable bridging of the call between the 2 endpoints directly, given that they are on the same non-routeable

Greetings- I recall mention of this bug at some tim elast year, but do not know if anything yet has been done to address it or if it is in any plans... I have multiple servers behind a f/w. I have ports forwarded on the f/w which map to port 22 on the various servers. i.e. ssh -p1001 FIREWALL_IP ---> NON_ROUTEABLE:22 This is fine, but the hostkey negotiation obviously fails... Is

Calling from a Cisco FXO port to an ATA-186 (SIP 3.1 image) via * (either CVS-HEAD-06/28/04-11:43:41 or CVS-HEAD-07/12/04-15:49:58) I didn't hear any ringing sound & get the following on the console: -- Called 5503 -- SIP/5503-f6b5 is ringing WARNING[-1323201616]: channel.c:1375 ast_indicate: Unable to handle indication 3 for 'SIP/10.10.2.250-9903' -- SIP/5503-f6b5 answered

On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 12:09:43PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote: > AI_CANONNAME is only relevant when the resulting official name is used, > which is not the case in tftpd for the address to bind to. Also > AI_ADDRCONFIG isn't helpful. This flag is good for sockets used to > connect(2) somewhere. But for listening sockets it makes tftpd fail to > start when -a 0.0.0.0:69 is

Hello, I need help in setting up tftpd-hpa to send a kernel to a client, on a debian woody installation. I did manage the feat when using tftpd to send a kernel to a client which had a separate network interface card, but I would like to do it with integrated LAN. Trials with tftpd failed with error messages starting with 'PXE', and later I learned that tftpd-hpa is needed for the PXE

This is more a question than a serious proposal. The name of the pid file should probably be configurable, and it should be unlinked on normal termination, but no such thing exists in standalone mode. SIGTERM and SIGINT should be catched and considered normal, I guess. Signed-off-by: Ferenc Wagner <wferi at niif.hu> --- tftpd/tftpd.c | 7 +++++++ 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0

Signed-off-by: Ferenc Wagner <wferi at niif.hu> --- tftpd/tftpd.c | 8 ++++---- 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/tftpd/tftpd.c b/tftpd/tftpd.c index 1f5d9d6..ff39c85 100644 --- a/tftpd/tftpd.c +++ b/tftpd/tftpd.c @@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) srand(time(NULL) ^ getpid()); while ((c = getopt_long(argc, argv, short_options,

> Correct. Like most UDP-based inetd services, tftpd is intended to be run in 'wait' mode. When the first request arrives, inetd starts the service but does not read the incoming packet (it can't, because it has no way to pass it along to the server). After that, inetd ignores that socket until the server exits. This isn't critical for tftp, but it does help to keep down the

Hello, we have two diskless machines in a routed network. Both get their IP adresse and tftp configuration via dhcp. When we start one machine all works well, when the second machine tries to download the kernel via tftp we get this error: Jul 8 09:49:52 voyager2 in.tftpd[8374]: RRQ from 10.63.5.122 filename /andreas/pxelinux.0 Jul 8 09:49:53 voyager2 in.tftpd[8374]: tftpd: read: Connection

I believe I have encountered a problem with tftpd-hpa very similar to the problem described in the following link: http://syslinux.zytor.com/archives/2003-May/001955.html We were running tftpd-hpa version 0.29 on RedHat 8.0 (on an older Dell desktop), and upgraded to tftpd-hpa version 0.42 when the problem was discovered; however, we are seeing the same thing after the upgrade. The TFTP

Hello, On my previous TFTP server I had logging. I did see all requests in logfiles. On my current TFTP server I have also added the options '-v -v -v', but nog logging. At least I can't find it them in /var/log/*/* Where does tftpd-hpa writes it's logging? Groeten Geert Stappers -- Leven en laten leven

Op 2013-08-26 om 09:35 schreef John McDonnell: > On Behalf Of Geert Stappers > Sent: Sunday, August 25, 2013 6:42 AM > > > > On my previous TFTP server I had logging. I did see all requests > > in logfiles. > > > > On my current TFTP server I have also added the options '-v -v -v', > > but no logging. At least I can't find it them in

Hi! I am using OpenBSD 4.4 with the build-in TFTP-Daemon for PXE. Distributing OpenBSD works fine. Now I want to distribute OpenBSD and WinPE. I've installed PXELinux 3.72 and configured it. Works also fine for PXELinux and distributing OpenBSD. To distribute WinPE I need a remap rule (\ -> /) for the TFTP-Daemon. I've created a file /etc/tftpd.remap with the following rule: rgG \\ /

Hi, when i look in my syslog i see. (syslog) Mar 12 04:40:49 linuxdev in.tftpd[15218]: RRQ from 10.1.5.121 filename scx.elf.gz Mar 12 04:40:49 linuxdev in.tftpd[15218]: sending NAK (1, File not found) to 10.1.5.121 here my client has asked for a file, and tftpd has said that it does not exist in its path (or cannot access it). looking in the tftpd.c (from 0.36) i see that on line 779 this

The default path is /var/run/tftpd-hpa.pid, which can be overridden by the newly introduced -P option. On normal termination (SIGTERM or SIGINT) the pid file is automatically removed. Moved setting the umask later, right before entering the select loop, so that it does not affect the permissions of the pid file. Signed-off-by: Ferenc Wagner <wferi at niif.hu> --- tftpd/tftpd.c | 38

I've got in.tftpd configured on a Fedora Linux server. The service is configured to boot printersm and sun sparcs. The printers boot fine, but there's a problem with the sparcs. When the sparc sends an initial request for a file, in.tftpd forks a process to handle it. If I do a "netstat -pan | grep tftp" I see that this forked process is listening on local address

Hi all, Sorry for posting here - but I figured there are many people with Cisco IP phones here - and I use them with Asterisk :-) I have a couple of Cisco 7940 phones. I've loaded the SIP firmware OK, loaded the SIP configuration files OK, they work with Asterisk just fine. My question is - will I have to keep on running the tftp server for them for ever and ever? Isn't there any