similar to: Using Linux traffic shaping to prioritise SIP/IAX traffic?

Hello - What I want to do seems very simple - I want to make sure any H.323 traffic gets processed before anything else entering or leaving this network. The network has a videoconferencing device on the LAN at 192.168.16.4. A Linux firewall NATs an external IP Address to this internal address and I have appropriate SNAT and DNAT rules that work. The NAT and connection tracking rules all work

Hi, Is it possible to put some kind of bridge which will do traffic shaping/prioritising between my 6 external IP addresses and my PPPoA modem interface? My other option is to put some kind of device at the edge of all my networks to shape the traffic in/out. I'd rather do it in one box if possible? thanks Mike

Hi, complete newb and I apologise for it. I have a setup where my linux box has multiple broadband connection where I am routing certain things over certain interfaces, currently 2 links eth2 is a 1500/256 and eth3 is a 512/512, eth0 is the link to the LAN for users. What I am trying to do is traffic shape the information going out eth0 to the local users by the interface the traffic arrived

On 15/12/17 07:05, Kenneth Porter wrote: > I came across this on the Fedora devel list. I added > /etc/sysctl.d/51-bufferbloat.conf containing the suggested line and it > installs the new codel qdisc as desired. There's probably more knobs > that might be useful to tweak but this makes a good start. More reading > on the bufferbloat site suggests that the later "cake"

Hi, my shorewall is version 4.0.15 on Debian Lenny. I have 3 following interfaces: eth0 net (4mbit/512kbit) eth1 loc (100mbit) eth2 loc (100mbit) I want to shape traffic from net on two lan interfaces like: - default is 2000mbit for each local interface - if is no traffic on eth1 is 4mbit for eth2 (and vice versa) My tcdevices eth0 4000mbit 512kbit eth1 -

Hi, I have a typical configuration for my firewall/gateway box: single network card, with a pppoe connection to the DSL modem. I''m already successfully shaping the uplink (how come that the wondershaper.htb doesn''t use the ceil parameter? It should implement bandwidth borrowing!) but i found the ingress policy a little bit rough. I''d like to keep the traffic categories

Exactly what it says in the subject really. Looking for a way to prioritise the netlogon requests on the network above the file share transfers. We have a few desktops that are used for design files and are connected by 1Gbe along with a fleet of WiFi (802.11g generally) enabled laptops. Trying to logon while the desktops are transferring large files can cause some nasty issues. Thinking about

Does anyone here implement traffic shaping with shorewall? I need to shape BitTorrent traffic on my network so that upload/downloads do not overwhelm normal function or, even more importantly, my imminent conversion to VOIP for all telephone service. I followed the shorewall documentation guide but am not sure if what I have done is the Right Way Of Doing Things. Nor am I satsified with the

Hello, I''m Alexandra Well, i have been working with cbq around 3 month ago without any problems, what i do is control the bandwith to 64Kbit for input and output and it works well. But now I don''t want control the Bandwith, i only need prioritize udp trafic over tcp trafic Can somebody to help me with my requirement? Thanks Alexandra

Hi ! I found an excellent article about QoS and traffic shaping for VoIP (Asterisk IAX protocol), which is designed to improve sound quality even over very busy lines. http://www.howtoforge.com/voip_qos_traffic_shaping_iproute2_asterisk Should I just cut and paste all that to shorewall''s tcrules (replacing 4569 with 5060)? Additionally, author of this article uses IAX protocol,

I try use setup traffic shaping with Shorewall-4.0.2 and have fault. When i start Shorewall with tc-files configured i get follow messages: ... RTNETLINK answers: No such file or directory We have an error talking to the kernel ERROR: Command "tc filter add dev eth2 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 50 u32 match ip src 0.0.0.0/0 police rate 500kbit burst 10k drop flowid :1" Failed

Hi, After reading section 9 of LARTC it seemed to me that a pure TOS based QoS setup with be sufficient for a small newtork. Interactive packets could have the highest priority, second highest for DNS and small HTTP packets and lowest prio for all others. The advantage is that, the setup would be simply a couple of iptables lines, because the default pfifo_fast qdisc already implements

Hi Guys, I''m asking this question again because I have exhausted resources for understanding how to get it to work. I''ve read the howto on getting traffic shaping to work (shorewall''s web site) as well as trying out wondershaper''s htb and cbq scripts. Somehow both does not seem to happen as I want it to. I''ve also read through the lartc

I''m looking over this traffic shaping available in the tc* files. I went through this when I did my own traffic shaping outside of shorewall previously. For the average (i.e. home, perhaps) user, I''ve never understood why we use these more complicated shaping algorithms that define classes and guaranteed minimums and maximums and so forth. For most home, or other small use

Hi! I have reprise try to resolve this problem, suspended from 17 dec 2005 I have try to apply the suggest of Jerry (see above). The problem still exist. See attach shorewall config, dump and tcpdump when I check to exit whit SSH from firewall... In the masq file is reported the last my attempt in order to resolve my problem, however I have test also the example reported in MultiISP.html, but

Hello, does anyone have a working solution for the shaping both incoming and outgoing traffic in such way, that for a given client the *sum* of incoming and outgoing traffic is somehow defined? My ISP does the same thing, it gives me just a line of a defined rate, no matter the traffic direction (i.e. here is your line, the clock speed is 1024kbps, do what you want). I''m a litte bit

Hello Chuck! I have 128kbit/s for 70 computers and if several users start several FTP/HTTP/Torrent downloads (or one downloads with several threads) or also open several htmlpages with big content, for other users remain not very much. As i hear Squid make traffic shaping on IPaddress base and in my scenario every user will work in equal borders (as another) for all his connections.

Two questions here... Im using 2.0 as my NAT gw box between my cable modem and my internal home network. #1 - Shaping Implementation How would I configure shorewall to give the highest priority for traffic to & from an IP address on my internal network. Maybe Im being a bit dense, but I couldnt figure it out. #2 - SSH & Shaping Strategy Well I managed to figure out how to give ssh

Hi to everybody. I read some info and documentation but i still can''t find how to make this simple setup for example . I just want to make priority of certain traffic without shaping the traffic . For example SSH and RDP first priority Mail second priority WEB and FTP third And everything else last priority. What will be the simple and best way to achieve this. I will appreciate

Dear List, I am wanting to perform some traffic shaping as the subject of this email suggests. What I am wanting to do is this; I would like to have traffic shaping performed on the following protocols: HTTP, RDP, GRE, PPTP, SIP and IAX. Obviously I would like to have highest priority set for voice packets so much so that the general http traffic does not impede on the voice packets. I