similar to: first few seconds of greeting cut-off

On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On Mar 19, 2010, at 11:08 AM, 琬菁楊 wrote: > > > Hello Tristan and all, > > I have already know that if I want to do this feature(c -> EFI Byte code) > for GCC > I should further modify the GCC front end(parser) to solve the problem (the > size > of pointer is determined at

On Apr 6, 2010, at 1:10 AM, Tristan Gingold wrote: > > On Apr 3, 2010, at 2:36 PM, Russell Wallace wrote: > >> On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 6:17 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: >>> No, please don't. This is something we specifically do not want to support. The issue is not the parser, the issue is that struct field offsets are no longer constant in

I am trying to get my xterm window under gnome to open with large fonts, with light green foreground and dark green background. I have the following .Xdefaults file contents: $ cat .Xdefaults ! This is a comment ;-) #ifdef COLOR *customization: -color #endif !! Let's cast a wide net, for any app supporting these ! Blink instead of beeping *visualBell: True *scrollTtyOutput: False

Hello all, I want to the do followings: (1) Modify the LLVM front-end(clang) to support EFI C (2) Add EFI Byte Code target to LLVM I am wondering to know which task should I do first, modify front end or porting LLVM? thanks yi-hong -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Lu Mitnick <king19880326 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello all, > > I want to the do followings: > > (1) Modify the LLVM front-end(clang) to support EFI C > > (2) Add EFI Byte Code target to LLVM > > I am wondering to know which task should I do first, modify front end or > porting LLVM? > > thanks > > yi-hong As long as

If I have a global variable in my dialplan and I change it, does that change immediately take affect for all calls that are active? Here is my situation. The company I work for has two office groups that share a building. The two offices are separate companies but support one another and want to be able to transfer calls as if they were all on the same phone system. Each company has 4

Hello, all. I'm having a deeply frustrating time getting multiple parking lots to work and am wondering what I am doing wrong. I am using Asterisk 1.6.1.1. I defined two separate parking lots in features.conf as follows: [parkinglot_a100] ; SSI context => a100-parking parkpos => 900-920 findslot => next [parkinglot_a10] ; EBC context => a10-parking parkpos => 800-820

I have a situation where gnome console does not handle vt102 escape sequences properly and therefor need to employ xterm instead. When I run xterm from a gnome terminal window I am presented with an extremely small terminal window employing an almost unreadably small font. I have attempted to set the font size using xrdb and a custom .Xresources file. I can change the colour scheme. I can

Hi Guys. I've had a lay off from Asterisk for 12 months but I am starting to look into it again. I am not very Linux savvy and found it hard going the last time. I've started playing with it in the last 3 weeks and I have to admit to making more head way this time. The first problem I'm stuck on and I cant find a solution to is that sound files that I have recorded (be it by

Hello all, I have one Asterisk 1.4.21 system connected to a North American POTS line. Normally hangup detection works fine, and Asterisk hangs up properly if you are talking to a caller and they hang up; but occasionally a call comes in (typically from a US telemarketer) where the caller hangs up just as voicemail recording is starting, and you get a voicemail recording of dialtone (then

> How does EFI describe structures if the pointer size can change? This > shouldn't be a harder problem than C struct -> llvm struct. I assume > the EFI bytecode has some way to describe them. What is it? EFI describe structures almost like C. There are EBC instructions that have two immediates: one for 32bits pointers and one for 64bits pointers.

Hi, At my house, I have two POTS lines. Both are connected to my * server on a TDM400P card. As an example, say the phone numbers are (919)555-1212 and (919)555-1213. I also have four SIP extensions, an ATA with a fax machine, and a DID coming in from an ITSP. I have an autoattendant configured that talks and allows users to forward to the extension they choose, but my family doesn't like

On 17 Dec 2010, at 03:15, Michael Spencer wrote: > As long as EFI C isn't radically different from normal C, I would > suggest adding a EBC target to LLVM first. Otherwise you have no way > to test the clang modifications. As was stated in the last post on this subject, EFI C has integer types that have a size determined at run time. I can't see how this would be integrated

Hi, Yes InternalExtension is the context and 2093 the extension. Just to explain something odd that?s happening (and I?m very stumped with this) .I think my contexts are definately the reason that I can?t interrupt the menu for incoming pstn calls to choose a submenu: My users register with my sip proxy (SER). Therefore when I create an entry for them in sip.conf I set only one context. Also to

I've rebased these patches to ensure they're up to date.

Has anyone used Gastman/Astman successfully? I have it up and running (Gastman win32), but have a problem with the creation of end stations on the map. I'm not sure of the format of the extension to use when creating a end station icon. Services like Conference bridge and Musichonhold seem to work ok (I use 555@mainmenu and 666@mainmenu) for the Icon extensions. IAX softphone seems to work

I'm trying to setup a VERY simple mainmenu ivr but can't seem to get the tones to be recognized during the background( ) the playback and background files play, but asterisk doesn't do anything when I start pushing keys - I've tried it from softphones and pstn line phones Can anyone tell me what I'm doing wrong? Required contexts Exentions.conf below [from-broadvoice]

Dear all, I want my PhD thesis which I hand in tomorrow to look even nicer: Does polymap in the splancs library not allow horizontal plotting of y-labels? I have tried polymap(studyarea, xlab = "x (m)", ylab = "y (m)", las = 1) but it doesn't change the labels? Mayby some function in library(spatstat) support las? Thanks! Sincerely, Tord

To whom it may concern, I get the following message when I run my function: Warning message: multi-argument returns are deprecated in: return(call.fn, repl, time, from, to, last.year, occup.m, ant.occ.m, > version platform i386-pc-mingw32 arch i386 os mingw32 system i386, mingw32 status major 1 minor 8.0

On 12/16/10 17:42, Lu Mitnick wrote: > Hello all, > > I want to the do followings: > > (1) Modify the LLVM front-end(clang) to support EFI C > > (2) Add EFI Byte Code target to LLVM > > I am wondering to know which task should I do first, modify front end or > porting LLVM? You might want to look at the challenges discussed in this thread, mainly that pointer size