similar to: Priority usage: absolute sequential vs. sequential

Hello, I have data on the maturity of two morphs of fish. I want to test whether their maturity is evolving differently or not on a temporal scale (month). The maturity variable (independent variable) is continuous and the morph and month variables (dependant variables) are categorical. Because the data show variance heterogeneity, I modeled it with the function gls: kg1 =

Hello Everyone,   I’m a SAS user who has recently become interested in sequential clinical trials designs. I’ve discovered that the SAS based approaches for these designs are either too costly or are “experimental.” So now I’m looking for alternative software. Two programs that seem promising are SPLUS Seqtrial and R.   I recently obtained a 30 day trial for the SPLUS Seqtrial add-on and have

Hi R-Masters I need use a sequential approach in serie of cases, but may data is not normal. If data is normal distribution is very easy create analysis using likelihood ratio like of Wald test. But in my case I need use a non-parametric test (Mann-Whitney). I was use: RSiteSearch("sequential rank test") but not solve my problem. Do you know routine or package implement

Instead of using sequential integers for IDs for my objects I was wondering if I could easily make it so that my IDs where longer auto- generated random strings/integers. So instead of: http://www.mydomain.com/user/view/1 Would be: http://www.mydomain.com/user/view/d81096b87a7c5565f On top of that... is there big benefits for security reasons to use non-sequential numbers? Is it worth

I need to split a given matrix in a sequential order. Let my matrix is : > dat <- cbind(sample(c(100,200), 10, T), sample(c(50,100, 150, 180), 10, > T), sample(seq(20, 200, by=20), 10, T)); dat [,1] [,2] [,3] [1,] 200 100 80 [2,] 100 180 80 [3,] 200 150 180 [4,] 200 50 140 [5,] 100 150 60 [6,] 100 50 60 [7,] 100 100 100 [8,] 200 150 100 [9,]

> On Jun 30, 2016, at 4:14 PM, Renato Golin via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > On 30 Jun 2016 10:20 p.m., "Robinson, Paul" <paul.robinson at sony.com <mailto:paul.robinson at sony.com>> wrote: > > We've since stopped creating the tags, and gotten used to not having > > them. We do the 'rev-list --count' trick

Just starting to learn R so excuse me if this is a simple question. I'm wondering how I get the percent difference in sequential values in one column of a dataframe. If I had a dataframe and one of the columns was "value", how would I go about calculating (v2-v1)/v1 ....(v3-v2)/v2 ....(v4-v3)/v3 ...etc ? -- View this message in context:

My unit's firmware: library 05.03, tape d22h, shows the device as set to random mode. But mtx -f /dev/st0 status gives an error that google says the device is in sequential mode. dmesg|grep -i hp does reflect CentOS thinks the device is a sequential unit. I've tried this with Fedora 8, too, and both show the same, so it is either an issue with CentOS/Fedora RPMs, or the version of

Hi Everyone, I would like to do sequential subtractions within a group so that I know the time between separate observations for a group of individuals. My data: data <- structure(list(group = c("IND1", "IND1", "IND2", "IND2", "IND2", "IND3", "IND4", "IND5", "IND6", "IND6"), date_obs =

You can use these flags as described in the manual page to optimize access patterns, and to get better behaviour with the page cache in some scenarios. For my testing I used the cachedel and cachestats utilities written by Julius Plenz (https://github.com/Feh/nocache). I started with a 32 GB file of random data on a machine with about 32 GB of RAM. At the beginning of the test I evicted the

On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:16 AM, James Y Knight via lldb-dev < lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I don't think we should do any of that. It's too complicated -- and I > don't see the reason to even do it. > > There's a need for the "llvm-project" repository -- that's been discussed > plenty -- but where does the need for a separate

I am trying to determine the optimal filesystem for accessing large numbers of files (25,000+) in a single directory. I have read that ext3fs uses a sequential search algorithm and wanted to verify that this was still indeed the case since this article was published a year ago. http://bulmalug.net/body.phtml?nIdNoticia=1154 <http://bulmalug.net/body.phtml?nIdNoticia=1154&nIdPage=7>

In the following example exten => _1NXXNXXXXXX,1,Set(GROUP(outbound)=myprovider) exten => _1NXXNXXXXXX,n,Set(COUNT=${GROUP_COUNT(myprovider at outbound)}) exten => _1NXXNXXXXXX,n,NoOp(There are ${COUNT} calls for myprovider) exten => _1NXXNXXXXXX,n,GotoIf($[ ${COUNT} > 2 ]?denied : continue) exten => _1NXXNXXXXXX,n(denied),NoOp(There are too many calls up) exten =>

Hello everyone, I need to do a sample size calculation. The study two arms and two endpoints. The two arms are two different cancer drugs and the two endpoints reflect efficacy (based on progression free survival) and toxicity. Until now, I have been trying to understand this in terms of a one-arm design, where the acceptable rate of efficacy might be 0.40, the unacceptable rate of efficacy

I am trying to code the following excel formula in R. a b c Result Formula 1 10 0.1 #N/A IF(B2<20,NA(),C2+IF(ISERROR(D1),0,D1)) 2 20 0.2 0.2 IF(B3<20,NA(),C3+IF(ISERROR(D2),0,D2)) 3 30 0.3 0.5 IF(B4<20,NA(),C4+IF(ISERROR(D3),0,D3)) 4 40

Hello, I'm wondering if there are any packages/functions that can perform conditional sequential gaussian simulation. I'm following an article written by Grunwald, Reddy, Prenger and Fisher 2007. Modeling of the spatial variability of biogeochemical soil properties in a freshwater ecosystem. Ecological Modelling 201: 521 - 535, and would like to explore this methodology.

On 30 Jun 2016 10:20 p.m., "Robinson, Paul" <paul.robinson at sony.com> wrote: > We've since stopped creating the tags, and gotten used to not having > them. We do the 'rev-list --count' trick which mainly gets recorded as > one component of the version number, and it has been working for us. Does that work for sub modules inside the umbrella project? How

How do I prevent the following: I have several web servers behind the load balancer, how do I make sure that when something changes and web servers need to be restarted that they are not all restarted at the same time but rather one by one. Is there a way to configure sequential push of some kind? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are

I don't think we should do any of that. It's too complicated -- and I don't see the reason to even do it. There's a need for the "llvm-project" repository -- that's been discussed plenty -- but where does the need for a separate "id" that must be pushed into all of the sub-projects come from? This is the first I've heard of that as a thing that needs to

Like many others, I am new to R but old to SAS. Am I correct in understanding that R processes a data frame in a sequential ly? This would imply that large input files could be read, without the need to load the entire file into memory. Related to the manner of reading a frame, I have been looking for the equivalent of SAS _n_ (I realize that I can use a variant of which to identify an index