similar to: non-telephony use of T400P?

Hi Chris, I know this is quite an old email, but I was browsing through the archive :) I am currently working on "embedding" asterisk in one of Allwell's STB's. The idea is more or less exactly like yours. The STB will be solid-state and contain OS, Asterisk, Basic configuration and voice files on a flash disk. It will boot up and get a network share via DHCP. This network

Hi U can visit the http://iaxclient.sf.net for some opensource underdevelopment softphones. Take Care Obaid Amin Syed >From: Chris Albertson <chrisalbertson90278@yahoo.com> >Reply-To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com >To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com >Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Good W2K softphone >Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2003 23:00:13 -0700 (PDT) > > >I haven't

The disadvantage (depending on what you're looking at doing) is that they have to be in an operating computer Hmmm ... maybe my wish list for a self-contained FXS should expand to a self-contained one or two FXS and one FXO with software config and at least two ethernet ports (like one to internet connection and one to hub/switch for extra connections). This would be a nice self-contained

On the cheap side, the ITX or even MicroATX machines work great. These are commodity items, so they tend to be far less expensive than custom solutions. Various manufacturers, but we've had very good success with any of the AOpen MicroATX boards and their slimline MicroATX case: Aluminum: http://usa.aopen.com/products/housing/A340-series.htm Steel:

No it's not broken, I just did a CVS update recently. Try downloading from CVS and then and if you have problems quote the error messages in your e-mail. --- "Lic. Edwin Mamani Z" <emz@mail.iseye-bo.net> wrote: > > Hi > I am interest with asterisk, but I like download It and the link is > break > > Please, Any people give me this software > > tanks

--- "Olle E. Johansson" <oej@edvina.net> wrote: > From: "Olle E. Johansson" <oej@edvina.net> > To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk on FreeBSD > Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 08:24:22 +0100 > > Rich Adamson wrote: > > >>My Asterisk (fresh CVS) takes 98% of the system load on my FreeBSD > server.

--- Peter Zeltins <peter@fintrading.com> wrote: > > > Well, I happen to be one of those very specific cases... ;) and looks > like > will have experiment with it myself. Although I'd hate to re-invent > the > wheel. > > Peter Checking e-mail this morning it looks like we have two independent "fixes" that both do what has been suggested in this

I'm working on contributing two things for Asterisk 1) STUN suport, this will allow asterisk to detect any NAT firewalls and enable eventual self-configuration with respet to NAT 2) A GNU "autotools" based build system. This will enable developers to make their code more portable and for features to be enabled/disabled as compile time. As a first step

Is there a way to set to audio gain for each SIP extension? I see in the docs this can be done for zaptel but I don't see it documented for SIP. It would be nice to be able to make the various kinds of extensions have equal volume. ===== Chris Albertson Home: 310-376-1029 chrisalbertson90278@yahoo.com Cell: 310-990-7550 Office: 310-336-5189 Christopher.J.Albertson@aero.org

Hello, I've subscribbed to "IConnect". I use it eclusively for outbound calling. I like the rates they charge but people I call complain about the audio quality. They say it sounds like I'm using a "cheap mic." or they complain about echo. The sound is very clean at my end. I'm using a Bundgtone phone with meadi routed through Asterisk to IConnect. It's

How about a PCMCIA Zapata interface?? Asterisk and its strength kick ass as a test unit. Can't do some of the things a T-byrd can do but the Telco techs freak when you tell them its your PBX!!! ) 10. Re: The Smallest Asterisk Server Ever? (Panny Malialis) Message: 10 From: "Panny Malialis" <panny@hotlinks.co.uk> To: <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com> Subject: Re:

Perhaps everything isn't as spiffy as I thought When running zttool the card still reports as internally clocked Zaptel.conf: # Global data span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 bchan=1-15 dchan=16 bchan=17-31 loadzone=se defaultzone=se And as pointed out by Peter I do get a lot of D-channel warnings ... Aug 9 16:21:25 NOTICE[1350]: PRI got event: HDLC Bad FCS (8) on Primary D-channel of span 1 And

Hi, I've posted this question on OpenSS7 mailing list but I didn't get a clear answer. I have a system running asterisk using Digium T400P card. Can this same card be used with OpenSS7 project to carry SS7 links? Is there any difference between these two cards? -- Matteo D'Amato Network/Telecom Administrator Intelco Communication Inc

FWIW: I order a lot of Dells. My boss is cheap. That being said, I *like* Dell, it's a very well designed box. It's been said many times that Dell does not innovate, instead they copy and improve and I firmly agree with the "improve" part - they are a dream to work on. Some things to watch out for with Dell: 1. They typically tack on a shipping charge of $139 Cdn (yes they

Anyone care to elaborate on the differences between the T400P and the TE405P? -Darren -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050908/e817f8bb/attachment.htm

Can T400P be configured for nfas (one d-channel providing signaling for more than one span)? Thank you. Alex Zarubin -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20030522/f2b637a9/attachment.htm

Hello Everyone, I have two never-used, still in the static-bag T400P Cards that I bought a long while back that I'd like to get rid of. Before I ever got a chance to use them, I bought Sangoma A400 Cards instead, and now I definately don't need them any longer. They have the Dallas DS21Q352 Chip on them (A4 Revision). I'll be happy to test them before I ship them if you like.

Good day everyone, A Solution now exists for those of you still looking for the first model of Quad T1/E1 Interface Cards - the T400P and E400P. The T400P and E400P were manufactured by Digium until a few months ago, and were designed and released under the GNU Public License as the Tormenta II by Zapata Telephony. Varion, Inc. is now in full production manufacturing these boards. With the

Hi, is there anyone who have experience with more as one card in one machine ? Or, somebody from the Digium team who can make an assertion about this ? Regards, Thomas.