similar to: Problem enabling write-back cache for IBM ServeRAID controller in CENTOS 4.2

Hi *, I try to install Xen 3.0.0 on a IBM x342 with a ServeRAID 4Lx controller. The box boots with "plain" 2.6.12.6 (aic7xx- and serveraid-support included). It does not with a similar configuration of 2.6.12.6-xen0. Any hints, boot options? by Töns -- There is no safe distance. _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com

> I'd like to monitor the disks connected to a ServeRaid-8k controller in a > server running Centos 7 such that I can know when one fails. > > What's the best way to do that? It's been a long time since I worked with ServeRaid, and things may have changed in the meantime. IBM used to have a an iso with ServeRaid related tools (ibm_sw_srapp_.....) that included Linux

On 3/14/19 2:31 PM, isdtor wrote: > >> I'd like to monitor the disks connected to a ServeRaid-8k controller in a >> server running Centos 7 such that I can know when one fails. >> >> What's the best way to do that? > > It's been a long time since I worked with ServeRaid, and things may have changed in the meantime. > > IBM used to have a an iso

> hwilmer wrote: >> >> I'd like to monitor the disks connected to a ServeRaid-8k controller in >> a server running Centos 7 such that I can know when one fails. >> >> What's the best way to do that? > > From a *really* short search, see it has a controller card If you do an > lspci, what does that tell you - is it yet another rebranded LSI card? If

IBM''s website says that Solaris 10u1 has them built in, Shouldn''t that mean they are in sNV too? I''m booting off the network and off DVD, and just before the installer starts I get a message about ''no disks found.'' Format does the same thing. What driver module should be used for the ServeRAID 7k. I did use the ServeRAID Support CD to define the

Hi there, I'm in the process of installing Centos 5.2 on an IBM x236 w/ ServeRAID 7k I recently acquired to act as a samba file server. The hardware has all passed various stress tests I could throw at it so we're okay there. My question is. Has anyone had any luck getting the latest IBM ServeRAID Manager v9.0 working in CentOS? If so how? ServeRAID Manager is based off Adaptec's

Hi, I'd like to monitor the disks connected to a ServeRaid-8k controller in a server running Centos 7 such that I can know when one fails. What's the best way to do that?

Hi all, we are about to buy some IBM x3550 M2 servers with ServeRAID M5014 SAS onboard controller. Can anyone confirm that these controllers will work with CentOS 5.5 (seems to be some rebranded LSI controller). I cannot find any hint in the 2.6.18-194.3.1.el5 sources... Regards, Peter -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type:

I need to install CentOS 5.2 on a IBM Server xSeries 226, which comes with a IBM SERVERAID 6i RAID card. I think it is not a true hardware RAID card. I has, nevertheless, an interesting feature: 128MB of cache with battery backup. I launched the CentOS boot DVD and CentOS correctly identified the card and the RAID 5 array as configured by the controller's BIOS. My question now is:

hwilmer wrote: > > I'd like to monitor the disks connected to a ServeRaid-8k controller in > a server running Centos 7 such that I can know when one fails. > > What's the best way to do that? >From a *really* short search, see it has a controller card If you do an lspci, what does that tell you - is it yet another rebranded LSI card? If so, MegaRAID. mark

Hi I am new to R so I apologize if this is trivial. I am trying to predict the resistance or susceptibility of my sequences to a certain drug with a randomForest function from a file with amino acids on each of the positions in the protein. I ran the following: > library(randomForest) > > path <- "C:\\..." > path2 <- "..." > name <-

1. ext4 mke2fs -b 4096 -m 5 -t ext4 -O^uninit_bg -r 1 -v /dev/sdb1 sdparm --command=sync /dev/sdb 2. 150G 3. gdisk /dev/sdb x a 2 w y sdparm --command=sync /dev/sdb 4. mount /dev/sdb1 /mnt/sdb1 cd /mnt/sdb1 extlinux -i /mnt/sdb1/boot umount /mnt/sdb1 sync;sync;sync sdparm --command=sync /dev/sdb cat gptmbr.bin >/dev/sdb1 sync;sync;sync sdparm --command=sync /dev/sdb

Hi, I do seem to have a slight problem with upgrading two of our machines to CentOS (from SuSE, but that doesn't really matter). Both systems are IBM x-Series 360 with a ServeRaid controller for the "internal" hard disks an a QLogic QLA2200 fibre channel controller for an external stack of disks. On SuSE (kernel 2.4.26) the ServeRaid is controller 0 (resulting in the internal Raid

smartctl, hdparm, and sdparm all are valuable tools to obtain hard drive info. But, they don't seem to work, at least, on obtaining hard drive info from drives on a Dell PERC controller. Instead, I'm given basic PERC controller info, not drive info. Is there a tool to let me get the hard drive make/model/serial numbers from a hardware RAID setup? Thanks. Scott

Hi all. Views associated with admin controllers must always specify both :controller and :action when using link_to. Example: <%= link_to ''Edit'', { :controller => ''/raid_manager'', :action => ''edit_raid_template'', :id => raid_template.id } %> The above is being called from within the Admin::RaidManagerController. The

Hi, Does anyone know how I can find out if an ibm serveraid 8k sas storage controller (zero channel RAID) is a real hardware RAID controller and supported in the standard CentOs kernel or is it a fake raid controller. I am trying to decide if I should get the serveraid controller or go get a 3ware controller. Regards, -- Tom Diehl tdiehl at rogueind.com Spamtrap address mtd123 at

Does anyone else noticed problems after updating openswan to openswan-2.6.32-27.2.el6_5.i686 ? In our case a connection to Cisco VPN 3000 Series would no longer work. I can see in the log an ASSERTION FAILED error and the connection would remain in Pending phase 2. Mar 7 16:24:40 firewall pluto[7647]: "ciscovpntest" #2: discarding duplicate packet; already STATE_MAIN_I1 Mar 7

I have an ext4 filesystem for which the reported disk usage is not correct. I have noticed the discrepancy after I rsync-ed the content to another filesystem and noticed that the used space on the target is almost double of the size reported on the source. Both machines are running the same software - with the same kernel version and same coreutils version (which I later upgraded to latest

Latest virtio spec says the feature bit name is VIRTIO_BLK_F_FLUSH, VIRTIO_BLK_F_WCE is the legacy name. virtio blk header says exactly the reverse - fix that and update driver code to match. Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini at redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> --- Changs from v1: comments updated include/uapi/linux/virtio_blk.h | 6 +++---

Latest virtio spec says the feature bit name is VIRTIO_BLK_F_FLUSH, VIRTIO_BLK_F_WCE is the legacy name. virtio blk header says exactly the reverse - fix that and update driver code to match. Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini at redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> --- Changs from v1: comments updated include/uapi/linux/virtio_blk.h | 6 +++---