similar to: Asterisk 1.6.0-beta3 Released

The Asterisk Development team has released another beta test release of Asterisk 1.4, 1.4.0-beta3. This release also contains a number of bug fixes, and some improvements to the chan_sip channel driver (for SIP devices) to mitigate the impacts of a certain class of denial-of-service attacks that have recently been published. Note that Asterisk 1.4 is not vulnerable to the chan_skinny exploit

The Asterisk Development team has released another beta test release of Asterisk 1.4, 1.4.0-beta3. This release also contains a number of bug fixes, and some improvements to the chan_sip channel driver (for SIP devices) to mitigate the impacts of a certain class of denial-of-service attacks that have recently been published. Note that Asterisk 1.4 is not vulnerable to the chan_skinny exploit

The Asterisk development team has released version 1.4.19 of Asterisk and 1.6.0-beta3 of Asterisk-addons. The new Asterisk-addons release contains a few bug fixes over the previous version. http://svn.digium.com/view/asterisk-addons/tags/1.6.0-beta3/ChangeLog?view=markup Asterisk 1.4.19 contains a large number of fixes over the previous release, 1.4.18. For a full list of changes, see the

The Asterisk development team has released version 1.4.19 of Asterisk and 1.6.0-beta3 of Asterisk-addons. The new Asterisk-addons release contains a few bug fixes over the previous version. http://svn.digium.com/view/asterisk-addons/tags/1.6.0-beta3/ChangeLog?view=markup Asterisk 1.4.19 contains a large number of fixes over the previous release, 1.4.18. For a full list of changes, see the

http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/beta/dovecot-1.1.beta3.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/beta/dovecot-1.1.beta3.tar.gz.sig Please try and report any bugs. Beta2 still had a few bad bugs, but I'm hoping this release is near a usable state. I've been a bit busy with school lately so I haven't had time/energy to answer mails in here. The main reason has been this lab course

Does any schedule exist for beta3? I'm now running stable snapshot from cvs, but i don't think it's a good thing, beta2 has memory leak in mysql code So what should i do? apply patch to beta2 or beta3 will be really soon? -- Pavel

The third BETA build of the 10.0-RELEASE release cycle is now available on the FTP servers for the amd64, i386, ia64, powerpc, powerpc64 and sparc64 architectures. The image checksums follow at the end of this email. ISO images and, for architectures that support it, the memory stick images are available here: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/ISO-IMAGES/10.0/ (or any of the FreeBSD

I tested Vorbis encoder - beta3 version, and here are my thoughts: - In comparison to beta2, subtle high-frequency artifacts seem to be gone (though they were small in beta2). Good job there! :-) - Velvet.wav also sounds better, but transparent quality is reached at -b256+. - Horn.wav still sounds very sucky, mode -b256 gives ~100kbps (this is understandable because in this sample practically

The PDF file on the web, which is an appendix on nonlinear regression associated with the CAR book, is very nice. When I ran through the code presented there, I found something odd. The code does a certain model in 3 ways: Vanilla NLS (using numerical differentation), Analytical derivatives (where the user supplies the derivatives) and analytical derivatives (using automatic differentiation). The

Hi, I encoded some songs into 350 kbit/s with beta2 and beta3 too, and I don't know why, but it seems the b2 sounds better (makes a better quality ogg file)... The b2 contains more the b3 contains less high sounds. And with the b3, the size of file is smaller with 4-5%... Do you know this problem, or do you think so, that the sound quality is good (or better in the b3) ?? Please be carefull

Dear All I'm attempting to speed up my model building procedure, but need some help with the loops I've created...please bear with me through the explanation! My basic model call is something like: m0sulf.nlme<-nlme(conc~beta0*exp(-beta1*day)+beta2*exp(-beta3*day), data=m0sulf, fixed=(beta0+beta1+beta2+beta3~1),

We are proud to a announce another beta release of Samba 4.0, beta3 What's new in Samba 4.0 beta3 ============================= Samba 4.0 will be the next version of the Samba suite and incorporates all the technology found in both the Samba4 alpha series and the stable 3.x series. The primary additional features over Samba 3.6 are support for the Active Directory logon protocols used by

Hi When trying to install asterisk1.4-beta3 I get the following error when running ./configure: "Cannot find ptlib-config - please install and try again" What is this ptlib-config? Can't seem to find it on google. Where can I find it and how can I install it? Moreover do I really need it, can I force a bypass? I have successfully installed zaptel 1.4.0-beta2 and libpri

Hi, I am trying a test of migrating a NT4 Domain to Samba 3 Beta 3 configured to use LDAP on Redhat 8. Is this possible? Details ------- I previously had Beta 2 on LDAP running as it's own domain controller without problem and could create users (in LDAP) with smbpasswd -a. XP clients could join and login OK. Now I have flushed that setup and have loaded Beta 3 configured to use LDAP,

Hello, I have a question concerning fitting a cox model with a random intercept, also known as a frailty model. I am using both the coxme package, and the frailty statement in coxph. Often 'shared' frailty models are implemented in practice, to group people who are from a cluster to account for homogeneity in outcomes for people from the same cluster. I am more interested in the classic

Hello, I would like to use the parfm package: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/parfm/parfm.pdfhttps://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/parfm/parfm.pdf in my work. This package fits parametric frailty models to survival data. To ensure I was using it properly, I started by running some small simulations to generate some survival data (without any random effects), and analyse the data using

Hello everybody, i already searched the archieves, but i still don't know what is wrong in my implementation, mybe anybody coud give me some advice ll1<-function(rho,theta,beta1,beta2,beta3,beta4,t,Szenariosw5,Testfaellew5,X1,X2) { n<-length(t) t<-cumsum(t) tn<-t[length(t)] Szenn<-Szenariosw5[length(Szenariosw5)]

What's up fellows... I am a begginer in R and i am trying to find the parameters of one likelihood function, but when i otimize it, always appers a error or advertisement and the solve does not occur. The problem seems like that: "lMix<-function(pars,y){ beta1<-pars[1] beta2<-pars[2] beta3<-pars[3] beta4<-pars[4] beta5<-pars[5] alfa1<-pars[6]

Dear all I used R2WinBUGS package's bugs() function to generate MCMC results. Then I tried to save the simulation draws in R, using read.bugs() function. Here is a simple test: ###################### library(coda) library(R2WinBUGS) #fake some data to test beta0=1 beta1=1.5 beta2=-1 beta3=2 N=200 x1=rnorm(N, mean=0,sd=1) x2=rnorm(N, mean=0,sd=1) x3=rnorm(N, mean=0,sd=1) lambda2= exp(beta0+

Hey everybody, I have pushed the latest changes to the Github repository and released the third beta version of webgen! A generated version of the new webgen homepage is now also available at http://webgen.rubyforge.org/beta-doc/ Note that nearly all of the links to the reference documentation are still missing. However, you will get a directory listing showing the available page under a