similar to: RDMA/Ethernet wi ROCEE - failed to modify QP to RTR

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2013:0106 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0106.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: e3b7e6c0aa51586886057885c13080db1e40390a330d1fd09bcea3315de30629 qperf-0.4.6-3.el5.i386.rpm x86_64:

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2013:0106 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0106.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: e3b7e6c0aa51586886057885c13080db1e40390a330d1fd09bcea3315de30629 qperf-0.4.6-3.el5.i386.rpm x86_64:

Hi Jan, I asked almost the exact same question as you about 6 months ago and someone provided some Gen4 results for me (But I can''t seem to find them in email), they were a fair bit better than Gen3. With IPOIB, you want connected mode and a large 32Kb+ MTU for max bandwidth, 1Gbyte/sec or more should be possible with Gen 4. Here are some of my original test results on my Opteron

Forgot to mention that I was using CentOS7.3 and GlusterFS 3.10.3 that is the latest available. From: gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org [mailto:gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org] On Behalf Of Hatazaki, Takao Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2017 2:32 AM To: gluster-users at gluster.org Subject: [Gluster-users] Is transport=rdma tested with "stripe"? Hi, I have 2 servers with Mellanox

Hey, if you haven't started already, now would be a good time to begin translating the release notes which are already on the wiki. We're going to begin QA tomorrow and will finish the release notes from our findings in QA. So if you now begin and watch the release notes page, you'll just have to put the changes into the already translated stuff. Thanks in advance (and for the work

Hi, I have 2 servers with Mellanox InfiniBand FDR hardware/software installed. A volume with "replica 2 transport rdma" works (create on servers, mount and test on clients) ok. A volume with "stripe 2 transport tcp" works ok, too. A volume with "stripe 2 transport rdma" created ok, and mounted ok on a client, but writing a file caused "endpoint not

looks like your rdma is not functional did you tested with qperf? On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 7:37 PM, Hatazaki, Takao <takao.hatazaki at hpe.com> wrote: > Forgot to mention that I was using CentOS7.3 and GlusterFS 3.10.3 that is > the latest available. > > > > *From:* gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org [mailto:gluster-users-bounces@ > gluster.org] *On Behalf Of

it's strange since this kernel don't have kvm support, qemu or qemu-kvm or kvm package is not added. even though it was said that 5.4 will support kvm?:-( Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > New Packages in RHEL 5.4 Beta: > ******************************** > blktrace-1.0.0-6.el5.src.rpm > celt051-0.5.1.3-0.el5.src.rpm > etherboot-5.4.4-10.el5.src.rpm >

HELP!!! Someone is forging my domain to spam AOL accounts. Anyone know how I can stop this. I have deleted 400 - 500 of these over the last 2 days. TIA!!!!! -----Original Message----- From: Mail Delivery Subsystem [mailto:MAILER-DAEMON at palmettodomains.com] Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2006 9:55 AM To: apache at palmettodomains.com Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details The

Dear R Users , As a beginner in QP, I'm trying to solve a Support Vector Machine problem by a QP. In particulare I am using the quadprog package. My questions are here: 1- In the document for the package (The quadprog Package), the inequality constraint is mentioned with >= , however in a standard QP, this usaully is written with <= . This constraint should be multiplied by a

Hi I'm having problems getting the "factorized" argument in solve.QP (part of the quadprog library) to work as expected. The helpfile states that when the factorized argument is set to TRUE, then the function requires the inverse of a square-root factor of the Hessian instead of the Hessian itself. That is, when factorized=TRUE, the Dmat argument should be a matrix R^(-1), such

Dear R users, I'm trying to run the Support Vector Regression by a general quadratic programming function like ipop ( ) in kernlab or solve.QP ( ) in quadprog packages. Since they are general, their application in Support Vector Regression can lead to misunderstanding, particularly when constructing matrices. Even their examples are general and applied in Support Vector

I was thinking about my solve.qp problem on my way home tonight and I think I can fix it by making Dmat the identity matrix. I'll check this weekend to make sure but my thinking is that doing this will make all the "variances" the same so that they shouldn't come into play during the evaluation of the objective function. Thanks though for any confirmation of this or other

Hello David, same problem here with solve.QP. dykstra is causing problems as well and giving for the value NA if factorized = TRUE: library(quadprog) library(Dykstra) R<-cbind(c(1,1),c(0,1)); d<-c(t(R)%*%R%*%c(2,1)) solve.QP(solve(R),d,-as.matrix(c(1,1)),-2,1,factorized = TRUE) S<-t(R)%*%R; solve.QP(S,d,-as.matrix(c(1,1)),-2,1)

Greetings, I'm trying to code a test case for get_corrected_query_string() in perl in t/parser.t, but I'm getting the following error: Can't locate auto/Search/Xapian/Query/get_correct.al... I take it something isn't implemented yet? Here's the code: ok( $query = $qp->parse_query( 'one or two',

De?????????aFF5fSolkr, Ni?????ce8063449341 dqVday! J0407154OAKV- h ard??????war????e i???s ??a ?????fac???????tor y ?????su154196320p11749pl????????y???in??g v5441ari????????ou?????s m?????et??????al ??????????pa????????rts??? ????????by????????? ?????OD???????M s????er723498vic130576eS89S71dGT.W7KCwJHCe ?????????Pr???????o???v???????ide37 C as ti???????ng,5299

The check in vmci_transport_peer_detach_cb should only allow a detach when the qp handle of the transport matches the one in the detach message. Testing: Before this change, a detach from a peer on a different socket would cause an active stream socket to register a detach. Reviewed-by: George Zhang <georgezhang at vmware.com> Signed-off-by: Jorgen Hansen <jhansen at vmware.com> ---

The check in vmci_transport_peer_detach_cb should only allow a detach when the qp handle of the transport matches the one in the detach message. Testing: Before this change, a detach from a peer on a different socket would cause an active stream socket to register a detach. Reviewed-by: George Zhang <georgezhang at vmware.com> Signed-off-by: Jorgen Hansen <jhansen at vmware.com> ---

I got following error while I was using solve.QP() in my problem: > Dmat = matrix(c(0.0001741, 0.0001280, 0.0001280, 0.0002570), nrow=2) > dvec = t(c(0,0)) > Amat = matrix(c(-1,1,0,-1,0, 1,0,1,0,-1), nrow=5) > bvec = c(-20000, 1, 1, -50000, -50000) > solve.QP(Dmat,dvec,Amat,bvec=bvec) Error in solve.QP(Dmat, dvec, Amat, bvec = bvec) : Amat and dvec are incompatible! >

Dear R Users, How can I prevent solve.Qp from printing the solution progress ? Thanks in advance, Tolga This email is confidential and subject to important disclaimers and conditions including on offers for the purchase or sale of securities, accuracy and completeness of information, viruses, confidentiality, legal privilege, and legal entity disclaimers, available at