similar to: Using require_relative to speed up rspec require time.

Why does Ruby-1.9.2-p0 require an additional ../ for relative paths when compared to the same code for ruby1.8? if RUBY_VERSION < ''1.9'' require File.dirname(__FILE__) + library else require_relative File.dirname(__FILE__) + ''/..'' + library end -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core"

Hey list, Does anything exist that can show me which lines are explicitly tested? RCov is great, but it doesn''t really give a sense of _actual_ coverage, indeed, there is no guarantee that functions executed were in fact called as the result of a line being tested. I know nothing of the rspec internals, but would a simple list of executed lines be a relatively simple feature to add?

Hey, I''m using rspec and rails and have a spec that tests if a before_filter is executed, I also have a spec that tests if a method called by the filter is executed. It appears however that when I should_receive something, it is no longer actually called when I fire the http request. I''m not sure how, or where exactly I should manually fire the filter, either before or after the

Hi, I starting a new project, and have run into behavior I cannot replicate in irb, (i.e. outside of using rspec) when the directory? returns true, so I thought I''d ask here, in case any one has seen this badhavior. ruby-1.9.2-p136 rspec (2.5.0) rspec-core (2.5.1) rspec-expectations (2.5.0) rspec-mocks (2.5.0) When I try to run this spec: require Pathname(__FILE__).ascend { |d|

Hey list, RSpec is great, I''ve been using it at work for a couple of months now. One gripe I have is that I find it hard to know exactly to what extent my code is covered by the specs. I am aware of RCov and Heckle; they''re great, but I''d like to demonstrate another perspective of coverage analysis I''ve hacked up. The perspective is that of what is mocked and

Here is a small btrfs vs. ext4 benchmark with kernel 2.6.37-rc1. compilebench with options -i 10 -r 30 on 2.6.37-rc1 btrfs ========================================================================== intial create total runs 10 avg 73.11 MB/s (user 0.34s sys 1.96s) create total runs 5 avg 49.53 MB/s (user 0.41s sys 1.62s) patch total runs 4 avg 22.13 MB/s (user 0.09s sys 1.79s) compile total runs

Hi, This started as an off hand comment in [1] but this appears to be a real issue so I'm moving the discussion to the mailing list. In r270942 the time taken to run LibFuzzer's test became noticeably longer. I am building on * Arch Linux (4.5.4-1-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Wed May 11 22:21:28 CEST 2016 x86_64 GNU/Linux) * I am building libFuzzer and running its tests like so ```

Reproduced, should be easy to fix. Will do it. And thanks for noticing, on my machine this fails very fast and the test passes because it sees everything it wants to see. --kcc On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 6:18 PM, Dan Liew <dan at su-root.co.uk> wrote: > Hi, > > This started as an off hand comment in [1] but this appears to be a > real issue so I'm moving the discussion to the

Hey, I''m using rspec and rspec_on_rails to test some RSS feed views, the problem is that the specs spew out messy warnings when they run: ignoring attempt to close channel with link opened at byte 61, line 3 closed at byte 141, line 5 attributes at open: {} text around open: "ss version=\"2.0\">\n <channel>\n <title" text around close:

Why is RJS so dependant on programatic creation of Javascript? RHTML is a great implementation in that it puts HTML first, and Ruby second. I would have thought RJS would be the same way: a .js with ERb helpers for generating Javascript functions. RJS putting Javascript second means: - I have to learn a whole new set of commands to use Scriptaculous. - Developers have to constantly chase the

Hi there, I'm having a problem with sshd demons not shuting down after connection is closed. The strange thing is that this is happening on both my Redhat 6.2 server and Redhat 7.0, both running OpenSSH_2.3.0p1. I'm positive that KeepAlive is set to yes ! Is this a common problem ? I'm suspecting that is has something to do with the client as well. Think we're all using

Hi all, I've come across a very strange bug with Xapian 1.0.9.0 and the Turkish query parser when trying to index a string (as posting) that looks like this: "...bir araya getiren CD'leri son teknolojiyle piyasaya...". The actual offending bit of the string is: 'leri It throws the message I have shown below. The real annoyance is that I can't seem to catch it because it

From: Leitch, Matthew C. Sent: Monday, January 24, 2011 6:53 PM To: 'info at network-theory.co.uk' Subject: question about the pt() calculation Hello Thank you for your time. I am a graduate student at the University of Texas Medical Branch, and I was wondering if you could help me with a R program I am writing. I have some data that is stored a file that has 1733 rows and 4 columns.

On Sep 20, 11:50 am, wbrana@gmail.com wrote: > On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 3:47 AM, Daniel J Blueman > > <daniel.blueman@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sep 19, 7:20 pm, wbr...@gmail.com wrote: > > >> RAID details: > >> > >> md8 : active raid10 sda7[0] sdd7[3] sdc7[2] sdb7[1] > >> 62925824 blocks 256K chunks 2 far-copies [4/4] [UUUU] >

Done. r271095 On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 7:55 PM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote: > Reproduced, should be easy to fix. Will do it. > And thanks for noticing, on my machine this fails very fast and the test > passes because it sees everything it wants to see. > > --kcc > > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 6:18 PM, Dan Liew <dan at su-root.co.uk> wrote: >

Hi, Am I right in thinking that whatever is in your lib/ folder doesn''t get reloaded on each request in dev mode? Jeroen -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to

Hi, I want to use R within a unix shell script where I repeatedly open and close R (doing some computation within R whilst it is open). i.e. something like #!/bin/sh R --vanilla << EOF # some R commands EOF # some unix commands R --vanilla << EOF # some R commands EOF # some unix commands ...etc the problem is that since I open and close R many times, the shell script takes a long

Hello, In lib/Analysis/InlineCost.cpp, inlining of recursive functions is disabled because it is like loop unrolling. But - I could not find a way to have loop unrolling do the job - In the context of functionnal languages (I am implementing one), inlining small recursive functions is often a great gain My question is what is the cleanest and simplest way to inline small recursive functions ?

Hey list, I''m trying to use the rcov integration that rspec provides in my Rails application. As per the documentation on the website, I''ve created the following rake task: lib/tasks/specs_with_rcov.rake: require ''spec/rake/spectask'' desc "Run all specs with rcov" Spec::Rake::SpecTask.new(''specs_with_rcov'') do |t| t.rcov = true

On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 10:13 AM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek at gmail.com> wrote: > ... > > sdi at iniza:~/src/llvm-toolchain/build$ ./bin/llvm-lit -v > ./tools/clang/test/Sema/asm.c > llvm-lit: /home/sdi/src/llvm-toolchain/llvm/utils/lit/lit/llvm/ > config.py:334: > note: using clang: /home/sdi/src/llvm-toolchain/build/bin/clang > -- Testing: 1 tests, 1 threads --