similar to: -R tunnels

Hi Alon, I confirmed with pkcs11-tool (from OpenSC) and I can confirm that pressing return when asked for the pin causes the login to stop (and not to try a empty pin). Can you confirm if a empty pin is actually a valid pin, and if not, can the patch be accepted? Once again, the problem is that from a user experience, *some/most* users would expect they can skip pkcs11 token authentication just

On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 7:57 PM, Alon Bar-Lev <alon.barlev at gmail.com> wrote: > On 17 June 2016 at 20:58, Nuno Gon?alves <nunojpg at gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> It seems there is a bug with the pkcs11 feature where a zero-length >> PIN is accepted. I believe this is a bug, since the user might want to >> press return when asked for the PIN to

----- Mensagem Original -----=20 Eu boicotaria estas empresas s=F3 pelo fato de financiarem os enjoativos e = rancentos Cassetas, mas me surpreendi ao descobrir que tantos produtos que = eu costumo comprar s=E3o transg=EAnicos. Fui conferir no site do greenpeace= e =E9 verdade!!!!!!!!!!!!! Boicote neles! ----- Original Message -----=20 C A M P A N H A=20 N A T A L S E M B A I X A R I A

I have created shell script for MRTG statistics of droped/rejected packets: ftp://slovakia.shorewall.net/mirror/shorewall/mrtg/ http://slovakia.shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/mrtg/ rsync://slovakia.shorewall.net/shorewall/mrtg/ example: http://slovakia.shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/mrtg/example/ It is not based on /var/log/messages (syslog), but iptables counter. A lot of packets are droped/rejected

When sending print jobs back to back .. say 5 times or so .. sometimes a character or two get droped .. causing the printout to be some what garbled. This happens from NT as well ... heh .. which is really fun when they're printing postscript .. cause when the 1st character or so is droped from a postscript print job .. it's postscript commands are printed out as ascii. Is anyone else out

Hi forks: I've been testing SMB2 with samba 3.6.4 performance these days, and I find a weird benchmark that SMB2 write performance is slower than SMB1 in 10Gb ethernet network. Server ----------------------- Linux: Redhat Enterprise 6.1 x64 Kernel: 2.6.31 x86_64 Samba: 3.6.4 (almost using the default configuration) Network: Chelsio T4 T420-SO-CR 10GbE network adapter RAID: Adaptec 51645 RAID

Hi to everybody !!! I have a intranet where win2k machines are domain controlers and i have too linux machines serving databases. Currently those linux servers share its data using samba 2, so i keep users lists in each linux server to authenticate them. Now, i would like to upgrade my samba software to samba 3 and authenticate users on win2k domain. I found many material on internet about this

Folks, At what point in iowait should I start to worry about having a bottleneck, or is this something that can't be answerd with a single integer? According to sar, after my last reboot to turn off hyperthreading as a test, at one time, I see 4.9% iowait, but then one minute later, it droped back to 0.01%, and rarely even gets to 1.0%, at least what I remember from yesterday. ?

hello, when i create imap account in mail client (ex: outlook, thunderbird) it's allright. but if i want login with this account to webmail (i have 2 webmail: squirrelmail and roundcube) commonly i get error. squirrelmail say: Connection droped by imap. roundcube say nothing(white screen). But sometimes i can login. and i see one thing... when i restart apache, i can login above 1-2 hours,

Hi all Is it possible to just forward port to local computer but not give open access for that port? If I''ve understood right that this rule does give ACCESS from net to loc too: DNAT net loc:192.168.1.5 udp 7777 What I''m trying to say is that it would work so that everything that''s coming from net to that local computers port is DROPed or REJECTed if it''s

Every time I send an e-mail to the * list, I receive this "AntiSpam UOL" E-mail. is anybody else experiencing the same? How can I get rid of it? Uriel -----Original Message----- From: AntiSpam UOL [mailto:andersoncbr.sspam@uol.com.br] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 11:51 PM To: uriel@adelphia.net Subject: RE:RE: [Asterisk-Users] SIP / GrandStream Configuration Ol?,

Hello all ! Can anyone recommend me ATA device that REALLY has T.38 built in. So far I have heard of Telco Systems Access201, which seems to be impossible to bye in Europe (all resselers are droped Telco systems ATAs for some reason (tried in Germany and in UK so far)), and I have heard that SIPURA SPA-2100 should have T.38 built in into newer firmware, but I wasn't able to confirm that

Hola, Feliz Año!. Mira aquí: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10312417/running-an-r-script-using-a-windows-shortcut Y para precisar algunos conceptos sobre las varias alternativas existentes esta otra ayuda: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3412911/r-exe-rcmd-exe-rscript-exe-and-rterm-exe-whats-the-difference/3415135#3415135 Saludos, Carlos Ortega www.qualityexcellence.es El 8 de enero

Woooow! Kick this guy out from this list and pls filter *@uol.com.br It's very annoying.... Isamar ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 08:48:45 -0300 (BRT) From: AntiSpam UOL <andersoncbr.sspam@uol.com.br> To: isamar@isamarmaia.org Subject: RE:RE: [Asterisk-Users] G729 experiences.. [antispam_txt.gif] Ol=E1, Voc=EA enviou uma mensagem para

All, seems I too am suffering from posts to the list and being accused of SPAMing .... -----Original Message----- From: AntiSpam UOL [mailto:andersoncbr.sspam@uol.com.br] Sent: 26 September 2003 20:48 To: alow@prioritytelecom.com Subject: RE:RE: [Asterisk-Users] RTP routing.. <http://antispam.uol.com.br> <http://mail.i.uol.com.br/tirateima_txt.gif>

I am running a Redhat FC2 server, which runs postfix for mail, Squid for proxy and samba as Domain Controller and file server. I installed shorewall-2.1.11-1. In the shorewall rules /etc/shorewall/rules I added the following for samba ACCEPT LAN $FW:192.168.100.1 tcp 139,445 ACCEPT LAN $FW:192.168.100.1 udp 137:139 ACCEPT LAN $FW:192.168.100.1 udp 445

Hi, I need help with the randomForest prediction. i run the folowing code: > iris.rf <- randomForest(Species ~ ., data=iris, > importance=TRUE,keep.forest=TRUE, proximity=TRUE) > pr<-predict(iris.rf,iris,predict.all=T) > iris.rf$votes[53,] setosa versicolor virginica 0.0000000 0.8074866 0.1925134 > table(pr$individual[53,])/500 versicolor virginica 0.928

I hate to post HTML to the list, but I refuse to respond to this, and I would like to say that whomever is using this service is kinda stupid for subscribing an email address to the list using this service. I hope they learn a lesson by us, the list users, NOT responding to this, and eventually, after not receiving any list mail, they?ll wonder ?hmm why is this list so dead?? Just my .02.

hi, I have strange problems with HTB and several hundred classes flat structure i.e. root |--50kbps |--30kbps |--50kbps |--80kbps |--100kbps .... several hundred classes like this Ceil is the same as rate. The machine get no more than 2-3% average cpu(2.4Ghz pentium). What happens is that from time to time the traffic got "stalled". I tried numerous things to solve

Hello rowland, > > hang on a bit, the Debian link is for bind 9.8.x and the dlz reference > is for 9.8.1.dfsg-1. > I don?t recomend to use Bind 9.8.1 / 9.8.2 anymore - most distro use it but the shuold move due DLZ compile & bind bugs. and 9.8 soon goes on end of Life see https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01211/81/BIND-9.8.8-Release-Notes.html > Rowland > This just