similar to: moving X11 portforwarding out into a "plugin" framework

So, I have been testing ekiga 3.0 with Asterisk, and sadly, it don't work. I am told by the ekiga devs in http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=553595 and http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=553810 that the problem is that Asterisk does not support SIP forking. The issue is that I have multiple addresses on my workstation: 2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500

I am not subscribed to the list, so if you could CC me on replies, it would be appreciated. Hi there. I am running 2.0.8 on a linux 2.6 kernel with ipsec (i.e. no ipsec<n> interfaces). Since ipsec traffic comes in on the same interface as "net" traffic, I have been looking at the rules for "eth0_in" on my ipsec gateway/firewall. I see that "norfc1918" is

I have, for the time being, decided to split my dual ISP/single shorewall connection into two shorewall connections/boxes, each handling one ISP. I am running OSPF in the network and so far things are working out fairly well (from a client of the two gateways). $ ip route ls 10.33.66.2 via 10.75.22.199 dev eth0 proto zebra metric 20 192.168.200.1 via 10.75.22.254 dev eth0 proto zebra metric

If an ssh server receives a tun/tap tunnel request and sets up the tunnel concerned, as far as I can see there is currently no way for the server to configure the tunnel in a manner dependent upon (e.g) the key used to set up the ssh session. Whilst an id based on the key can be passed to the ssh child process, where the tunnel is dynamically allocated, its tunnel name is lost. This patch

I was previously using multiple providers on my "real linux" gateway which had a kernel that supported high marks and I was policy routing in tcrules. I''ve now moved to openwrt where their kernel apparently does not have high marks. I want to continue to be able to have multiple providers and a) policy route between them and b) be able to set marks for other things like

If an ssh server receives a successful inbound ssh connection with 'ssh -w' without a tunnel number specified (i.e. in 'any' mode), it allocates the next tunnel device available on the server. The next thing the server needs to do is to set up the tunnel device. How does the server know which tunnel device was set up by the current connection? I'd really like something

> -----Original Message----- > From: Brian J. Murrell [mailto:brian@interlinx.bc.ca] > > - Single Sign-On via Kerberos > > OK. Actually I understood this feature. I am just wondering how it > applies in an MS network. SSO to all of what? If my DCs are my > file/printer server(s) (let's say I mirror the data contents > of my PDC to > my BDC as well --

Hi all, currently I am considering writing a patch for OpenSSH that will allow portforwarding using the control_master unix domain socket. The idea is to introduce an extra SSHMUX command, SSHMUX_COMMAND_SOCKS, which will then pass control to the normal socks functions used for dynamic forwarding. The main reason for me to write this patch are: - some more control over who gets to connect to

Hi, The problem solved After installing new zaptel drivers, we ran the "genzaptel" command to generate /etc/zaptel.conf file,checked with "zttool" command and the card status was "Yellow alarm/Blue alarm/Recovering" and the card LED was blinking red and green. The problem was with the generated zaptel configuration., but not with the pin

Slightly OT, but I'm wondering if anyone here has come across a "soft ATA". That is, software that will perform the functions of a basic POTS line ATA on Linux with a zaptel driven card. I have a Linux machine with a zaptel card in it and I want to have another Linux machine running Asterisk utilize the zaptel card in the first Linux machine to make outgoing and receive

> On 24 Jan 2017, at 06:01, Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 4:54 PM, Vishwanath KC <vicchi.cit at gmail.com> wrote: > [...] >> Distributor ID: Debian >> Description: Debian GNU/Linux 8.2 (jessie) > > As you've seen, sshd requires that the system's getpwnam() function > knows the user, without which

Odd question I know. I am looking for source for as recent a kernel as possible running the old style xenlinux/xenified kernel (i.e. capable of running the xen3.3.x hypervisor). Any ideas where I can get this - preferably in git form? I think Stefano Stabellini had something that worked up to 2.6.36 (from memory). And yes, we would all prefer all our customers moved to xen4 but this is difficult

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47306 Bug #: 47306 Summary: segfault in nouveau_fence_update Classification: Unclassified Product: xorg Version: unspecified Platform: x86 (IA32) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau

As per Alex's suggestion, attached is the proof of concept "sfile" script. If there is anyone out there with great C skills who can recreate this functionality "out of the box", I think there would be a few happy campers (at least two, anyways). -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Re: Encrypt /decrypta file with ssh keys. Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 17:24:35

Does anyone have a better ENUM lookup handler than the built-in ENUMLOOKUP() function? The built-in function does not properly handle multiple return values such as: 8.9.9.3.2.8.8.6.6.8.1.e164.org has NAPTR record 200 10 "u" "E2U+SIP" "!^\\+1866(.*)$!sip:1866\\1 at tollfree.sip-happens.com!" . 8.9.9.3.2.8.8.6.6.8.1.e164.org has NAPTR record 200 10 "u"

Dear R Devel, I know that someone put this line in src/modules/X11/devX11.c:2824 for a reason, because commenting it out causes R to miss an important ConfigureNotify event in my window manager. The result is that plots are initially drawn off the window borders, unreadable. R_ProcessX11Events((void*) NULL); Unfortunately for me, this line is commented in the standard release of R, it has

if i have this setup: [sip users] -- [asterisk] --- [as5300] --- [pstn] asterisk will talk to as5300 using sip. i will use as5300 as a trunk on the asterisk so sip users can call out to pstn. what i would like to is do prepaid on those trunks, not on the sip users. sip users can call any other sip users . i want to do it that way coz i'm trying to build a multi-tenant pbx, and i will use

Does xen-4.1.1 really require python 2.7 (as per Ubuntu packaging) or will it actually work on python 2.6? I am trying to backport it to an Ubuntu LTS version and would rather not have to bring in Python 2.7 if possible. -- Alex Bligh

Hello, http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=ubuntu_1110_xenkvm&num=1 Ubuntu 11.10 with Xen 4.1.1 and Linux 3.0. Xen seems to be doing very poorly on that benchmark. If someone has time to repeat that benchmark it would be good.. Comparing the results to those from Stefano from XenSummit 2011 NA there has be something wrong.. the results at XenSummit were pretty much the

I seem to be running into a problem where I am trying to rsync from a source directory that lacks write permissions (i.e. r-xr-xr-x). Presumably this is because rsync creates the directory on the destination, then sets the permissions to match the source and then tries to sync the contents of the directory, which it cannot of course lacking write permission in the directory. Is there a way to