similar to: SFTP Chroot

Hey all, on the distcc mailing list, a thread about load balancing got a bit out of hand, and we started thinking about moving fsh-like connection caching into ssh itself to get rid of the overhead of starting up the python interpreter to run rsh. (Interestingly, mit's "rex", described at http://www.lcs.mit.edu/publications/pubs/pdf/MIT-LCS-TR-884.pdf, considers connection caching

Jefferson Ogata's patch http://marc.info/?l=openssh-unix-dev&m=108134938701018&w=2 adds a multiple authentication methods option to sshd. I updated the patch to 4.7p1 and added logic to allow it to work with privilege separation. https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1435 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name:

Hi :-) We use ssh-agent for batch jobs. The jobs get the key from the ssh-agent over the envoirment variables. When we start many jobs at the same time, the agent dont give the key to the job. We have tracet the our script an see the follow: ... 26918: 0.0004 so_socket(PF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0, "", 1) = 13 26918: 0.0001 fcntl(13, F_SETFD, 0x00000001) = 0 26918: 0.0003 connect(13,

Hi I have a daemon application that binds and listens on a TCP socket. To add security, I'd like to embed ssh/sshd in my application to handle the encryption and authentication for me. How do you suggest I go about it? Regards, Jaco -- "The future belongs to those who believe in their dreams." -- Nelson Mandela

Hello, Attached is a patch to add support for an "include" file in ssh configs. It is written against openssh-5.2p1. ## ~/.ssh/config Include ~/.ssh/config.contrib ## end - Leading ~/ expands to $HOME according to getpwuid_r?. - Leading ~username expands to $HOME for username according to getpwnam_r. - Fallbacks to /home/$USER are implemented for when struct passwd.pw_dir is NULL?

>> I understand that that is not how scp works today.>And it will likely never change. Why not? Just because "That's how we've always not done it" doesn't sound like a very good reason to me. >> I'm suggesting that we make a minor change to how it works.>scp is maintained for compatibility reasons only, as I've understood>things. That's still

Hi, I'm looking for a way to force users to use a pty and their login shell. They have a .profile that forces them to use a specific application. They are currently logging in with telnetd, so this is effective. I want to move to openssh, but this would allow "ssh user at host /bin/sh" and any other commands they can think of to bypass this restriction. Is there a way to

Hi, This is sort of a strange issue. But I am experimenting with ways to have a user log in and be presented with a perl script to interact with. When I do either or both of the following: 1) set the user's shell to /usr/bin/myperlscript 2) specify ForceCommand /usr/bin/myperlscript, applied to my user ...I get strange behavior when a command is appended to the client connect

Hey everyone, I hope this isn't an old issue; I wasn't able to locate it in the archives. I have a number of scripts which make use of ssh -i and scp -i, where the target host has the specified key in its authorized_keys file with a command= override to do immediate processing of the received data. This works extremely well, as we are able to establish single-function, triggered-action

Hi I have written a small introduction to newbies in Danish on ssh and friends. Now some people are questioning my advice and I think they have a point. I am advocating people to use DSA-keys and a config file with this: Protocol 2 ForwardAgent yes ForwardX11 yes Compression yes CompressionLevel 9 and running ssh-agent and ssh-add, and then loggin in without giving keys. One

Hi, many people are having problems using SFTP with ChrootDirectory when the jail directory (or the path above) is not owned by root. The question is if chroot'ing to usual home directories can be allowed, even though they are owned by regular users. I know that this topic has been discussed on the list several times now, so I searched the list archives for posts that invalidate the

Hi, please find a patch against openssh-4.7p1 This patch: 1) Allows for an optional configuration file 2) Allows a user to be restricted to a directory and it's children. Enjoy -- Alain Williams Linux Consultant - Mail systems, Web sites, Networking, Programmer, IT Lecturer. +44 (0) 787 668 0256 http://www.phcomp.co.uk/ Parliament Hill Computers Ltd. Registration Information:

The native authentication methods of openssh are (not counting insecure RhostsRSAAuthentication) 1) public key 2) password For users with home dirs in AFS space, method 1) does not work. Except with (non foolproof) fiddling on the access controls within the home directory. This might lead to security issues when done by inexperienced users. Without some work, only 2) remains. Being forced to send

According to the manpage: UseDNS Specifies whether sshd should look up the remote host name and check that the resolved host name for the remote IP address maps back to the very same IP address. The default is ``yes''. Thing is, while sshd *checks*, this doesn't actually control whether or not the client is allowed to connect, it seems at most to be an option that causes

Are there any plans on the table to add native support for two-factor authentication, such as password *and* public key? Visa PCI standards require two-factor authentication for remote access and if password+key was available in openssh it would be much easier to maintain and support than a full-blown vpn with all the cross-platform compatibility issues that come with one. Thanks! Jacob

I did not find any clues when 'googling' and could not find any search options on the archives. So, your answer does really not help. If you can help me with some reference, then it is highly appreciated. I would like to understand the rationaly. Not why 'it is just like it is'. No, why. What is the reasoning behind it. I speak Dutch, English, some Japanese and C. So, I can

Hello everyone, I just wanted to see if anyone has experience running Xen on: Dell 2950 III 2 x Quad 2.0 Ghz 1333Mhz FSB 32 GB DDR2 (8x4GB) 2 Disk Perc RAID 1 (7200 RPM SAS) Broadcom Dual Gigabit Ethernet LOM & TOE The requirements of each VM are not that high (and are all identical). I just want to run remote desktop and 1 other application at any given time (either a web based IE

Hi, I have a Dell PowerEdge 1950 with two NICs Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM5708 1000Base-T. I installed CentOS 5.1 and Xen 3.0.3 (RPM). One of my virtual machines has Windows 2003 Server. In this virtual machine my NICs appears like "Realtek RTL8139 Family PCI Fast Ethernet NIC". The problem is that when I ping to other machines sometimes the reply time value is very high: C:>

Greetings. I''ve reviewed the list archives, particularly the posts from Zakk, on this subject, and found results similar to his. drbd provides a block-drbd script, but with full virtualization, at least on RHEL 5, this does not work; by the time the block script is run, the qemu-dm has already been started. Instead I''ve been simply musing the possibility of keeping the drbd

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1461 Summary: session.c: don't chdir() after chroot() if chroot_path==pw->pw_dir Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.0p1