similar to: How to generate additional debug messages for sshd gssapi failures?

If I am trying to build OpenSSH 6.6 with Kerberos GSSAPI support, do I still need to get Simon Wilkinson's patches? --- Scott Neugroschl | XYPRO Technology Corporation 4100 Guardian Street | Suite 100 |Simi Valley, CA 93063 | Phone 805 583-2874|Fax 805 583-0124 |

this is the proposed gssapi diff against OpenSSH-current (non-portable). note: if this goes in, the old krb5 auth (ssh.com compatible) will be removed. please comment. jakob Index: auth.h =================================================================== RCS file: /home/hack/jakob/mycvs/sshgss/auth.h,v retrieving revision 1.1.1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.1.1.2 -r1.3 --- auth.h

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1066 Summary: off-by-one error with GSSAPI names Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.1p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org ReportedBy: dleonard at

Playing around with the [wonderful] GSS-API patches for OpenSSH [1] I noticed that there is a bit of functionality missing from OpenSSH/GSS-API, namely that authorized_keys2 has no meaning when using GSS authentication. Yes, ~/.k5login can be used to grant access to an account for applications that support Kerberos, as does OpenSSH with those GSS patches, but .k5login does not and cannot provide

As far as I know this patch has no security implications -- I don't believe that allowing sshd to use get_local_name() (in canohost.c) on a connected socket to determine it's own fqdn will allow a malicious client (or router or dns server) to make it come to the wrong conclusion. But please let me know if you think I'm wrong. Please also let me know if you're just not interested

I cooked this up while trying to figure out why thunderbird on Windows w/ SSPI was not working, but it turned out thunderbird does not use it, so I haven't been able to test it yet. I'm presenting it for discussion only, unless someone else can try it :) Modern versions of MIT kerberos support GSS-SPNEGO natively, but are only willing to negotiate for kerberos tickets and not NTLM

Hello! Please consider including the attached patch in the next release. It allows one to drop privilege separation code while building openssh by using '--disable-privsep' switch of configure script. If one doesn't use privilege separation at all, why don't simply allow him to drop privilege separation support completely? -- Sincerely Your, Dan. -------------- next part

I configure as follows: ./configure --with-zlib=/usr/local/include cc -o sshd sshd.o auth-rhosts.o auth-passwd.o auth-rsa.o auth-rh-rsa.o sshpty.o sshlogin.o servconf.o serverloop.o auth.o auth1.o auth2.o auth-options.o session.o auth-chall.o auth2-chall.o groupaccess.o auth-skey.o auth-bsdauth.o auth2-hostbased.o auth2-kbdint.o auth2-none.o auth2-passwd.o auth2-pubkey.o monitor_mm.o

hello, little problem compiling openssh 4.6p1 on irix using mipspro 7.4.x. c99 -o sshd sshd.o auth-rhosts.o auth-passwd.o auth-rsa.o auth-rh-rsa.o sshpty.o sshlogin.o servconf.o serverloop.o auth.o auth1.o auth2.o auth-options.o session.o auth-chall.o auth2-chall.o groupaccess.o auth-skey.o auth-bsdauth.o auth2-hostbased.o auth2-kbdint.o auth2-none.o auth2-passwd.o auth2-pubkey.o

Please pardon any user idiocy involved, but I applied the OpenBSD 3.4 patch to the 3.9 sources on both my i386 and sparc64 OpenBSD 3.4 boxes, and get the same error: cc -o sshd sshd.o auth-rhosts.o auth-passwd.o auth-rsa.o auth-rh-rsa.o sshpty.o sshlogin.o servconf.o serverloop.o uidswap.o auth.o auth1.o auth2.o auth-options.o session.o auth-chall.o auth2-chall.o groupaccess.o auth-skey.o

I am trying to compile sshd 3.8p1 on Tru64 UNIX V4.0F Patch Level 7. Previously I've compiled the entire 3.6.1p2 distribution with no problems. The problem seems to occur when linking sshd. The linker is unable to find xcrypt and shadow_pw functions (openbsd-compat/*.c). The libopenbsd-compat seems to have built without errors. I configure as follows: CC=cc CFLAGS=-O LDFLAGS=-non_shared

Hello, Currently OpenSSH has a fixed order on how the key authenticates the user: at first it tries to authenticate against TrustedUserCAKeys, afterwards it does it against the output keys from the AuthorizedKeysCommand and finally against the files as set in AuthorizedKeysFile. I have an use-case where this order is not ideal. This is because in my case the command fetches keys from the cloud

I am trying to install openssh on sco unix 7.1 and getting following error , please help I have installed zlib - zlib-1.2.3 Openssl openssl-0.9.8e Openssh openssh-4.6p1 # make if test ! -z "yes"; then \ /usr/bin/perl ./fixprogs ssh_prng_cmds ; \ fi (cd openbsd-compat && make) cc -o ssh

Also what exact distro and version are you having the problem on and what version of ld does it have? Mine is $ ld --version GNU ld version 2.29.1-23.fc28 -- Darren Tucker (dtucker at dtucker.net) GPG key 11EAA6FA / A86E 3E07 5B19 5880 E860 37F4 9357 ECEF 11EA A6FA (new) Good judgement comes with experience. Unfortunately, the experience usually comes from bad judgement.

I'm seeing this on a clean build after downloading 3.7 to my OpenBSD source tree... bash-2.05b# make [...] ===> lib ===> ssh ===> sshd cc -o sshd sshd.o auth-rhosts.o auth-passwd.o auth-rsa.o auth-rh-rsa.o sshpty.o sshlogin.o servconf.o serverloop.o uidswap.o auth.o auth1.o auth2.o auth-options.o session.o auth-chall.o auth2-chall.o groupaccess.o auth-skey.o

How reasonable, acceptable and difficult would it be to "enhance" openssh so authorizations using kerberos (specifically kerberos tickets) consulted the authorized_keys file? And to be a bit more precise... consulted authorized_keys so it could utilize any "options" (eg. from=, command=, environment=, etc) that may be present? I'm willing to make custom changes, but

hi On 6/7/18 4:03 PM, Darren Tucker wrote: > On 8 June 2018 at 07:09, PGNet Dev <pgnet.dev at gmail.com> wrote: >> Verifying a report I just got pinged about, building vanilla openssh 7.7p1 on linux configures ok, but fails build around 'retpoline' > [...] >> Should the retpoline flag be getting added? If so, what's needed to make LD happy with it? > >

Is anyone maintaining the OSF_SIA support in openssh? This seems to be an obvious bug triggered if you try to connect as a non-existant user. >From auth1.c line 459 #elif defined(HAVE_OSF_SIA) (sia_validate_user(NULL, saved_argc, saved_argv, get_canonical_hostname(), pw->pw_name, NULL, 0, NULL, "") == SIASUCCESS)) { #else /*

On February 9, 2016 7:28 PM, Darren Tucker wrote: > To: Randall S. Becker <rsbecker at nexbridge.com> > Cc: OpenSSH Devel List <openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org> > Subject: Re: Test Failure OpenSSH 7.1 P2 on HPE NSE for key-commands > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 10:35 AM, Randall S. Becker > <rsbecker at nexbridge.com> wrote: > > Thread split from my

When using PAM to do password authenticaion the attempt/failure counter appears to be getting confused. This is using a rh62 system with the openssh-2.9p2-1 rpms... On the client side... [matthewm at toadhall (7) matthewm]$ grep Auth /etc/ssh/ssh_config RhostsAuthentication no RhostsRSAAuthentication no HostbasedAuthentication no RSAAuthentication no PubkeyAuthentication yes