similar to: Restrict port forwarding on server

Hi, Is it possible to restrict a client port-forwarding to one port? For example i want client X to open only port 1037 on server through port-forwarding, client Y only port 1038 and so on... How can this be possible? I use private/public keys authentication. Client version is openssh3.8p1, is windows client, and server version is latest openssh on a linux machine. Can anyone help please? Thank

Hi, I'm not sure if this is a bug or not, maybe someone noticed it also... I always do a remote port forwarding with openssh on 1026 port let's say ( ssh -R 1026:localhost:55555 ). Most times the port is opened on remote machine. But sometimes i notice that ssh can't do remote port forwarding to that port 1026. I looked on the remote machine (netstat -an) and no one is using that

Hi all, Does anyone know if it exists a patch for OpenSSH for Windows to allow authentication through certificates? Is it possible to make one if it doesn't exists? Using OpenSSH for Windows 3.8p1-1 20040709 Build. I know there is Roumen Petrov patch, but is for unix machines if i'm not mistaken. I need a similar one for Windows that work with the Roumen Petrov patch so i can have

Hello listmates, It's been a few years since I've set up a router... and for some reason I seem to be getting hung up on this one. Does anybody have a sample iptables config file that would incorporate NAT and forwarding for a simple router? Thanks. Boris.

Hi, I have a client on a Windows machine that connects through openssh on a linux server. I have this script (tunnel.cmd): @echo off :RUN echo Connecting? "C:/Program Files/OpenSSH/bin/ssh.exe" -R 40201:localhost:50300 -o TCPKeepAlive=no -o ServerAliveInterval=15 -o ServerAliveCountMax=2 -i id_rsa visma at 10.55.40.123 echo Restarting in 10 seconds? GOTO RUN It is runned from another

Hi all, I wonder if someone can help me with this: The setup is as follows: 192.168.1.254 - wireless ADSL modem, with DHCP pool on 192.168.100 - 192.168.200 192.168.1.250 - Linux firewall RED interface 192.168.2.250 - Linux firewall GREEN interface. There are some normal LAN clients behind the Linux firewall's GREEN interface, which can all access each other's shared services and also

Hi, I have the following problem with ssh, hope someone can help me with it: I have 2 processes of ssh server on same Linux machine. One of them is the normal ssh configuration for Linux, the other one starts with a custom configuration on another port. >From the client i do a remote port forwarding to the custom ssh server: ssh -R 1037:localhost:55555. After this command on ssh server

Hi I have a certificate in der format, from it with this command i generate a public key: openssl x509 -inform der -in ejbcacert.cer -noout -pubkey > pub1key.pub result is this: -----BEGIN PUBLIC KEY----- MIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GNADCBiQKBgQC7vbqajDw4o6gJy8UtmIbkcpnk O3Kwc4qsEnSZp/TR+fQi62F79RHWmwKOtFmwteURgLbj7D/WGuNLGOfa/2vse3G2

Hi, I have some questions about ssh server and Linux, hope someone can help me :) 1. Does Ssh server have a limit for the number of users that can connect ? 2. Does Ssh have restrictions about an username length? Or username format? We would like to use something like: foo_<GUID> ex: foo_ 5CEB80CF-150F-4ff0-8743-A6493FA200C1 3. Does Linux have a limit of user

Dear All, If I want make a lan users (with private IP) can access the internet just after passing the verification, what options do I have? What I want is: * If I user want to access the internet * He (must) run the browser * whatever the address he typed on the address bar, he will be brought to the verification location, which will be 'force' him to enter his username and

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2038 Priority: P5 Bug ID: 2038 Assignee: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org Summary: permitopen functionality but for remote forwards Severity: enhancement Classification: Unclassified OS: Other Reporter: damonswirled at gmail.com Hardware: Other

Hello, I would like to know if it is possible to automatically import the puppet classes to the dashboard in order to manage them from the gui. I didn''t find exact instructions to make the puppet clients report directly to the dashboard instead of importing the reports every time through the command rake RAILS_ENV=production reports:import . Does anyone has the exact instructions? Thanks

HI, R-Users, I have one problem: I have written the the programs which process all file in one directory: for example: setwd("C:/Documents and Settings/lma/My Documents/Vappu-saved/Log") as the start. .......... But I have many folders like "Vappu-saved" and there are a lot of files in each directory. What I want is using the same program what I write for the above

Hello, I have a queue with only one element and one agent member. I want that my call leave the queue after 30s. My problem is that my call stays 60s in the queue and my agent is called 2 times. Can you say me how can i do it please?? -------------------------------- [queue] music=default strategy=ringall timeout=30 maxlen=1 context=mbdsys announce-frequency=0 announce-holdtime=no

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1857 Summary: [RFE] restrict port forwarding to localhost Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.8p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org ReportedBy:

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1513 Summary: CIDR address/masklen matching support for permitopen= Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.1p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org

Hi, I have two 320 GB SATA disks (/dev/sda, /dev/sdb) in a server running CentOS release 5. They both have three partitions setup as RAID1 using md (boot, swap, and an LVM data partition). # cat /proc/mdstat Personalities : [raid1] md0 : active raid1 sdb1[1] sda1[0] 104320 blocks [2/2] [UU] md1 : active raid1 sdb2[1] sda2[0] 4192896 blocks [2/2] [UU] md2 : active raid1 sdb3[1]

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1949 Bug #: 1949 Summary: PermitOpen none option Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.9p1 Platform: All OS/Version: OpenBSD Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo:

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1267 Summary: PermitOpen - Multiple forwards don't works Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: v4.5p1 Platform: ix86 OS/Version: Cygwin on NT/2k Status: NEW Severity: security Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org

Hi Phillipp, developers; I likewise just submitted a patch for similar. It i buried under the thread named OpenSSH contract development / patch. At the request of the OpenSSH dev team, I submitted our patch in the mindrot Bugzilla https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2711 Your patch, I see is available there too https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2716 Anyhow, just drawing