similar to: OpenSSH performance with VIA padlock

I was wondering if someone with more familiarity with MC on X86 could consider looking into adding support for the hyphenated versions of the VIA Padlock instructions? If anyone is up for it there are details within these two bug reports.. http://www.llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=8556 http://www.llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=10266 -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous

On Jan 16, 2013, at 10:07 AM, Brad Smith <brad at comstyle.com> wrote: > I was wondering if someone with more familiarity with MC > on X86 could consider looking into adding support for > the hyphenated versions of the VIA Padlock instructions? Take a look at llvm/lib/Target/X86InstrSystem.td perhaps. -- Stephen Checkoway

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 12:04:52PM -0500, Stephen Checkoway wrote: > > On Jan 16, 2013, at 10:07 AM, Brad Smith <brad at comstyle.com> wrote: > > > I was wondering if someone with more familiarity with MC > > on X86 could consider looking into adding support for > > the hyphenated versions of the VIA Padlock instructions? > > > Take a look at

I got roughly the same performance results when I use the openssl speed test with and without a hifn 7956 cryto card Here's what I did: After the card is plugged in, kldload hifn; kldload cryptodev; I got the message: hifn0 mem 0xfc8f0000-0xfc8f7ffff, 0xfc8f0000-0xfc8f7ffff, 0xfc8f0000-0xfc8f7ffff irg 28 at device 3.0 on pci1 hifn0: Hifn 7956, rev 0, 32KB dram, pll=0x800<pci clk, 4x

Hello everybody, I tried to measure the performance of the available drivers for windows as a HVM guest. I used the gplpv drivers 0.9.11-pre17, the PV drivers from Novell, and the drivers from Citrix XenSource with the XenServer 5. The Novell and gplpv drivers were more or less at the same speed, for both, network and disk performance. The disk performance was about 10MB/s reading and

On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 12:42:53PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 12:49:09PM -0500, Russell R Poyner wrote: > > I'm tuning a samba 4.3 install on freebsd and I'm confused about aio > > settings. > > > > I've loaded the freebsd aio kernel module and tried various values > > or aio read size and aio write size, but it seems to

Hi all, There is a feature very common in PBX called PADLOCK , and I'd like to set up it on Asterisk 1.6. I have seen it in the internet but such scripts never work to me. I am trying to do something like that:Create a password and associate it with the callerid: exten => _*11*xxxx,1,Set(DB(CADASTRA/${CALLERID(num)})=${EXTEN:4}) Create a flag in order to verify later if PADLOCK is ON

Hi! I try to load an module that it is found in curent /lib/modules/`uname -r` tree ... root at sevcenco: ~ # ls -l /lib/modules/`uname -r`/kernel/drivers/crypto/padlock-* -rwxr--r-- 1 root root 14296 Mar 16 19:37 /lib/modules/2.6.38-0.el5.elrepo/kernel/drivers/crypto/padlock-aes.ko -rwxr--r-- 1 root root 10808 Mar 16 19:37 /lib/modules/2.6.38-0.el5.elrepo/kernel/drivers/crypto/padlock-sha.ko

On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 12:00:06PM +0100, Guus Sliepen > On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 03:57:06AM +0100, Andreas van Cranenburgh wrote: > > > With this patch the AES encryption acceleration of the VIA Nehemiah and > > Ezra processors gets used, as found on VIA Epia boards. > [...] > > Thanks, patch is applied! That's quick! It just occured to me, OpenVPN has a config

Hi all, We are using Tinc 2.0.22 as a layer 2 VPN between nodes over the Internet. We are experiencing very slow network speed using Tinc. Between 2 nodes, we have 150 Mbit/s network speed without Tinc (public IPv4 to public IPv4 using iperf), and only 3 Mbit/s using Tinc (private IPv4 to private IPv4). Here is the configuration of Tinc we use : AddressFamily = ipv4 BindToInterface = vmbr1

Why are legacy MACs (like md5-96), and legacy Ciphers (anything in cbc-mode, arcfour*(?)) enabled by default? My proposal would be to change the defaults for ssh_config and sshd_config to contain: MACs hmac-sha2-256,hmac-sha2-512,hmac-sha1 Ciphers aes128-ctr,aes192-ctr,aes256-ctr ...removing md5, truncated versions of sha1, umac64 (for which I can find barely any review), any cipher in cbc

I have a zpool that consists for a two-drive mirror. The two times I took the zpool offline, I had to resilver one of the drives (the same drive both times) when I imported it back. All drives in the pool show no read, write, or checksum errors and are new, so I'm looking to a software problem before hardware. Both drives are encrypted geli devices. I tried to reproduce the error with 1GB

Have 4 xen servers with windows domains. 2 work OK and 2 have xp domains with slow network performance. Doing most of the testing on a xen system that currently is not in production. Running xen 4.0 with 2.6.32 kernel from lenny backports. Have xp service pack3 freshly installed with no updates. Installed gplpv gplpv_XP_0.11.0.213.msi hdtack gives 60mb/sec which is good iperf gives ~15Mbits/sec

Please forgive me for the really dumb question following. I am a complete newbie to rsync. I have been trying to set up an rsync server and am unable to get any logging. I need to know if the following is possible. I'm rsyncing from the client and connecting with ssh to an rsync server. I can connect just fine and the files go with no problem. I'm going from a RedHat 7.3 with rsync

In a virtualized environment running Xen or VMware, can the guest operating systems utilize hardware crypto acceleration such as the "PadLock" AES acceleration built into VIA CPUs? (Wasn't able to find this info in any of ~400 Google hits, so I'm shooting it out a bit to let as many as possible benefit from the answer.)

In a virtualized environment running Xen or VMware, can the guest operating systems utilize hardware crypto acceleration such as the "PadLock" AES acceleration built into VIA CPUs? (Wasn't able to find this info in any of ~400 Google hits, so I'm shooting it out a bit to let as many as possible benefit from the answer.)

In a virtualized environment running Xen or VMware, can the guest operating systems utilize hardware crypto acceleration such as the "PadLock" AES acceleration built into VIA CPUs? (Wasn't able to find this info in any of ~400 Google hits, so I'm shooting it out a bit to let as many as possible benefit from the answer.)

I've been running the 8/1/2004 Head release up until a little over a week ago. I was forced to due to a card failure to upgrade to 1.2.16 without any advance preparation or testing (most of my connections are via satellite to all corners of the globe with high latency). Up until the upgrade I was running with very few issues. Since the upgrade I have been experiencing strange issues

Hi all, Forgive me if this has been asked before, but is there a reason mongrel_rails cluster::restart stops all ports and then restarts them again? Wouldn''t it be better to restart each port one-by-one in series so that upstream proxy servers can fail over while the restart is occurring, or am I missing something? Thanks, eden

Hello list, i?m looking forward to buy a new server. It should be low voltage so i?m thinking of a via eden processor like this one -> http://tinyurl.com/3ymlkl (sorry, there?s only a german page). Has someone expierence in using a via eden processsor? Thanks! Kamill