Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "choose the right sshfp"
2024 Jun 05
1
[Bug 3698] New: SSHFP validation fails when multiple keys of the same type are found in DNS
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3698
Bug ID: 3698
Summary: SSHFP validation fails when multiple keys of the same
type are found in DNS
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 8.7p1
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: ssh
2014 Apr 07
4
[Bug 2223] New: Ed25519 support in SSHFP DNS resource records
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2223
Bug ID: 2223
Summary: Ed25519 support in SSHFP DNS resource records
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: -current
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P5
Component: ssh
Assignee: unassigned-bugs at
2012 Aug 31
1
[Bug 2041] New: Check for SSHFP when certificate is offered.
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2041
Priority: P5
Bug ID: 2041
Assignee: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org
Summary: Check for SSHFP when certificate is offered.
Severity: enhancement
Classification: Unclassified
OS: All
Reporter: ondrej at caletka.cz
Hardware: All
Status: NEW
2014 Apr 07
1
Ed25519 keys in SSHFP RRs
Hello.
Subramanian Moonesamy has gotten the ball rolling to include Ed25519 in
IANA's registry for SSHFP key types [1].
I've opened a bug report [2] that includes a patch that adds the needed
support code and provisionally assigns Ed25519 a value of 4 (values
1,2,3 reserved for RSA, DSA, and ECDA, respectively) [3].
The enhancement request/bug is meant to keep the issue on the radar.
2011 Jul 28
1
Support for ECDSA and SHA-2 (SHA-256) in the SSHFP record
Hi,
I was sure I sent this to openssh at openssh.com, but cannot find that email now in my Sent mailbox, so I am sending it to the developers list.
I took a liberty and wrote an I-D with accompanying patch (with contributions from Ondrej Caletka) to support ECDSA in the SSHFP DNS resource record.
The I-D is here: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-os-ietf-sshfp-ecdsa-sha2 (and the source XML
2008 Oct 17
1
Hostbased login based on SSHFP DNS records?
Hi,
is it possible to use SSHFP DNS records to enable password-free host-based login?
What I already got working is to use SSHFP DNS records to verify the server host keys.
debug1: found 2 secure fingerprints in DNS
debug1: matching host key fingerprint found in DNS
But hostbased login does not work and I still need to supply a password to log in. (Or to configure a known_hosts file on the
2019 Feb 23
2
Possible bug: SSH doesn't prefer host keys listed in SSHFP records while connecting.
The reason why this is a bug is, for example, that if the server was
updated and it re-generated the ECDSA key you deleted, you would have
to do some non-obvious steps for your client to ignore it.
On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 11:49 AM Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 22 Feb 2019, Yegor Ievlev wrote:
>
> > Steps to reproduce:
> > 1. Run a SSH server with
2019 Feb 22
4
Possible bug: SSH doesn't prefer host keys listed in SSHFP records while connecting.
Steps to reproduce:
1. Run a SSH server with default configuration and point a domain to it.
2. Add SSHFP record to the domain, but only for Ed25519 key.
3. Attempt to connect with VerifyHostKeyDNS set to yes, but the rest
of settings set to defaults.
4. OpenSSH defaults to ECDSA instead of Ed25519 and refuses connection
because there is no ECDSA fingerprint in SSHFP records.
A stopgap solution
2012 Jul 17
1
[Bug 1972] ssh-keygen fails to generate SSHFP for ECDSA but exits with 0 code
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1972
Daniel Black <daniel.black at ovee.com.au> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |daniel.black at ovee.com.au
Keywords| |openbsd, patch
--- Comment #2
2012 Aug 31
9
[Bug 2040] New: Downgrade attack vulnerability when checking SSHFP records
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2040
Priority: P5
Bug ID: 2040
Assignee: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org
Summary: Downgrade attack vulnerability when checking SSHFP
records
Severity: minor
Classification: Unclassified
OS: All
Reporter: ondrej at caletka.cz
Hardware: All
2011 Jul 20
1
auto-accept keys matching DNSSEC-validated SSHFP records
Hi,
I submitted a patch back in November of 2009 to add local validation of
DNSSEC record to openssh. I recent updated the patch for 5.8, and
figured I do a little marketing while I'm at it. :-)
Someone had previously submitted a patch which simply trusted the AD
bit in the response, which is susceptible to spoofing by anyone who can
inject packets between the resolver and the client. Our
2019 Feb 23
2
Possible bug: SSH doesn't prefer host keys listed in SSHFP records while connecting.
Well, SSHFP is supposed to only be used on DNSSEC-enabled domains.
On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 9:59 PM Peter Stuge <peter at stuge.se> wrote:
>
> Yegor Ievlev wrote:
> > It would make more sense to treat SSHFP records in the same way as
> > known_hosts
>
> I disagree with that - known_hosts is nominally a client-local configuration.
>
> I think it's a very bad
2010 Nov 28
2
[PATCH] Use canonical hostname for DNS SSHFP lookup
In the current implementation, ssh always uses the hostname supplied by
the user directly for the SSHFP DNS record lookup. This causes problems
when using the domain search path, e.g. I have "search example.com" in my
resolv.conf and then do a "ssh host", I will connect to host.example.com,
but ssh will query the DNS for an SSHFP record of "host.", not
2019 Feb 23
3
Possible bug: SSH doesn't prefer host keys listed in SSHFP records while connecting.
Well, known_hosts isn't exactly trusted input, since it's usually
composed of the keys you first encounter, without any additional
checking, as opposed to (hopefully) correctly signed SSHFP records.
On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 10:22 PM Peter Stuge <peter at stuge.se> wrote:
>
> Yegor Ievlev wrote:
> > > I think it's a very bad idea to have the client start treating
2014 Apr 09
2
ED25519 SSHFP in OpenSSH & IETF
Hi All,
I've been working on a diff to get SSHFP support for ed25519 in OpenSSH.
SM has been working through the IETF process to obtain the SSHFP RR Type
number.
Despite getting "rough consensus", we still haven't heard anything from the
IETF Security Directors for the draft. SM sent a mail asking why it is taking
so long, and it appears that his mail was ignored.
Please see:
2012 Jan 04
0
ECDSA, SSHFP, and "Error calculating host key fingerprint."
When connecting to a host that provides an ECDSA host key and the
client has "VerifyHostKeyDNS" set to 'yes' or 'ask' SSH outputs a
mysterious and undocumented message "Error calculating host key
fingerprint." This error actually seems to be generated by
verify_host_key_dns(const char *hostname, struct sockaddr *address,
Key *hostkey, int *flags) in dns.c, but
2017 Apr 08
2
[Bug 2708] New: openssh: 7.5p1 update breaks ldns/sshfp
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2708
Bug ID: 2708
Summary: openssh: 7.5p1 update breaks ldns/sshfp
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 7.5p1
Hardware: Other
OS: FreeBSD
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: ssh
Assignee: unassigned-bugs at
2024 Nov 19
6
[Bug 3753] New: ssh-keygen and ssh-keyscan prints SHA1 SSHFP digest by default
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3753
Bug ID: 3753
Summary: ssh-keygen and ssh-keyscan prints SHA1 SSHFP digest by
default
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 9.9p1
Hardware: Other
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P5
Component:
2012 Jun 26
2
[Bug 2022] New: ssh segfaults when using ldns, SSHFP, a DNSSEC-enabled resolver and a CNAME
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2022
Bug #: 2022
Summary: ssh segfaults when using ldns, SSHFP, a DNSSEC-enabled
resolver and a CNAME
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 6.0p1
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
2015 Jun 22
2
Small issue with DNSSEC / SSHFP
Hi,
I found a small issue with DNSSEC validation of SSHFP lookups. (For reference
I used OpenSSH 6.8p1 on FreeBSD 10.1).
The issues is that when DNSSEC valiation fails, ssh displays a confusing
message to the user. When DNSSEC validation of a SSHFP record fails, ssh
presents the user with
"Matching host key fingerprint found in DNS.
"Are you sure you want to continue connecting