similar to: openssh 5.0p1: Solaris - Failed to allocate internet-domain X11 display socket.

Hello, I have just installed OpenSSH 4.6p1 and it appears that ChallengeResponseAuthentication is not allowed unless I explicitly set it to "yes" in the sshd_config file. I am using the same config file as I did with 4.5p1 where it was allowed by default. Also, this is OpenSSH package from sunfreeware, but I believe that both versions were compiled with the same options. Is this the

Hi folks, I have the that I must copy some through a Plag-Gateway of a Firewall over 2 host. A secure connection via "ssh - t hosta ssh -t hostb" works fine, but does this work with scp too? Icould not realize it either with scp (1.2.27 of ssh.com) or scp from openssh. Do you have any ideas? Thanks Stephan

Here is a patch to scp made against openssh-2.1.1p2 that adds the -L option to scp. The -L option tells scp to use nonprivilaged ports (by passing ssh the -P option). The non-free ssh's scp has this option, and it is required under some firewall setups (like mine) for scp to function. Please let me know if there are any problems with this patch, or if there is anything I can do to help get

Hi, attached is a patch by Chris Faylor <cgf at cygnus.com> relative to 2.2.0p1. Description: OpenSSH does not allow port gatewaying by default. This means that only the local host can access forwarded ports. Adding "GatewayPorts yes" to .ssh/config usually does this job. Unfortunately, OpenSSH does not recognize the same hosts.allow/ hosts.deny options as ssh.com's sshd

Hi, So I screwed up when writing the support for the curve25519 KEX method that doesn't depend on OpenSSL's BIGNUM type - a bug in my code left leading zero bytes where they should have been skipped. The impact of this is that OpenSSH 6.5 and 6.6 will fail during key exchange with a peer that implements curve25519-sha256 at libssh.org properly about 0.2% of the time (one in every 512ish

Friends, Sorry to write this to a developer mailing list. I have already approached some OpenSSH/OpenBSD core members on this, including Markus Friedl, Theo de Raadt, and Niels Provos, but they have chosen not to bring the issue up on the mailing list. I am not aware of any other forum where I would reach the OpenSSH developers, so I will post this here. As you know, I have been using the SSH

I'd like to address several issues raised by people in relation to my notice of the ssh(R) trademark to the OpenSSH group. Also, I would like to make a proposal to the community for resolving this issue (included at the end). First, I'll answer a number of questions and arguments presented in the discussion. > "the SSH Corp trademark registration in the US is for a logo

I received the following e-mail in response to an e-mail I had sent to SSH communications questioning the wisdom of their requesting OpenSSH to change it's name. Contained in the message is that statement that SSH Communications did not exert their trademark rights earlier becuase it's only recently that OpenSSH has become more visible. In the United States, this would invalidate the

A few people have commented that the synopsis in 'man 1 scp' is a bit difficult for humans to parse. I attach a diff between the distributed version and mine: (I suppose this should really go to the OpenBSD maintainers, but I wanted a little feedback about whether this was better or not.) Thanks, Andrew Stribblehill Systems Programmer, IT Service, University of Durham --------------

Hi, I applied the following minor diff to preserve the value of the extern variable across calls to process_sign_request2() in ssh-agent.c. I've no idea if the attachment of the attachment will come out correctly so a cvs diff is also attached. Regards, Alistair -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: "Alistair G. Crooks" <agc at

Hi, I have made a patch which improves scp utility. It adds two new features: rate limit and resume support. With rate limit it's possible to limit transfer speed. Resume allows to continue file transfer where it was last interrupted. Also the progress meter was improved. Here is my patch, please send comments about it and what I can do better if there is something to fix. ---

I would also like to mention that when I released TTSSH in May 1998, I had no concerns about violating any trademarks because I observed that the name "SSH" was already being used by several different parties for different purposes --- as the name of Ylonen's original SSH package and its derivatives, as the name of the protocol, and as a component of names of other implementations

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- ###### ## ## ###### ## ### ## ## ###### ## # ## ## ## ## ### ## ###### . ## ## . ######. Secure Networks Inc. Security Advisory

Hello, I came across an interoperability problem in OpenSSH 3.0p1 and 3.0.1p1 concerning the AFS token forwarding. That means that the new versions are not able to exchange AFS tokens (and Kerberos TGTs) with older OpenSSH releases (including 2.9p2) and with the old SSH 1.2.2x. In my opinion this problem already existed in Openssh 2.9.9p1, but I have never used this version (I only looked at the

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1371 Summary: Add PKCS#11 (Smartcards) support into OpenSSH Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.7p1 Platform: All URL: http://alon.barlev.googlepages.com/openssh-pkcs11 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component:

Right - I know you've had a discussion about the argv[0] stuff already, but I've written this simple script to simulate the (now missing) support for Debian, and was asked to send it to you... --- ssh-argv0 --- #! /bin/sh -e if [ "${0##*/}" == "ssh-argv0" ] then echo 'ssh-argv0: This script should not be run like this, see ssh-argv0(1) for details'

Scenario: I have a main website. I want to allow other people with web servers to use rsync to synchronize mirror copies of my website. When the mirror website uses rsync to connect to the server, how can it be sure that the server is not an IP spoofing impostor that is serving up altered files?

Dear R users, I am trying to do the forest plot follow the function given on web. However, the order of the tests has been sorted alphabetically. I would prefer keeping the order as data frame input so that I can group and compare (from the graph) the target immune NS1, IgG and IgM (where SD, BioRad, Pb etc are the brand names) > d x y ylo yhi SD.NS1

Could people please test -current? We will be making a release fairly soon. -d -- | By convention there is color, \\ Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> | By convention sweetness, By convention bitterness, \\ www.mindrot.org | But in reality there are atoms and space - Democritus (c. 400 BCE)

Dear R help I have a question on the variance of the binomial probit model. I have fitted the following model : > lmer1<-lmer(mp ~ l + op + l*op+ us_lev + bw_lev +(1|tatu) , + family = binomial(link="probit"), + method = 'Laplace', + data = matings, + msVerbose= True) > summary(lmer1) Generalized linear