similar to: [PATCH] SOCKS4A support

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 500 matches similar to: "[PATCH] SOCKS4A support"

2002 May 10
1
Patch for SOCKS4A in OpenSsh
I love SSH's ability to dynamically forward ports using SOCKS (either -D or DynamicForward) (ie "ssh -D 1081 private.mine.net"). But the thing that has caused me some pain, is that only SOCKS4 is supported. The SOCKS4 proxy specification does not permit hostnames, but only IP addresses. This isn't much of a problem if the target host is a public Internet host or otherwise DNS
2012 Oct 22
1
[PATCH] Implement remote dynamic TCP forwarding
Hi all, This is a client side only implementation of reversed dynamic (SOCKS) TCP forwarding, which means it is compatible with any existing servers have 'remote forward' capability. To establish such forward, use "ssh -R [BIND_ADDRESS:]PORT ...". The server will listen on that port and address and accept SOCKS traffics. Hope this will be useful for you. There was an
2003 Jun 25
1
socks5 support for -D
here's an up-to-date patch, should apply to both openbsd and non-openbsd versions of openssh. i did only test ipv4 addresses. Index: channels.c =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/ssh/channels.c,v retrieving revision 1.191 diff -u -r1.191 channels.c --- channels.c 24 Jun 2003 08:23:46 -0000 1.191 +++ channels.c 25 Jun 2003 12:14:19
2008 Jul 04
3
[Bug 1482] New: SOCKS4A support
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1482 Summary: SOCKS4A support Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.0p1 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org
2001 Oct 24
2
disable features
this (uncomplete) patch makes various features compile time options and saves up to 24K in the resulting ssh/sshd binaries. i don't know whether this should be added to the CVS since it makes the code less readable. perhaps WITH_COMPRESSION should be added, since it removes the dependency on libz -m Index: Makefile.inc =================================================================== RCS
2001 Jul 04
1
remote forwarding in 2.9p2
Hi, It looks like remote forwarding with SSH v2 is not working on my Solaris machines (and from what I understand from the source, it may not work elsewhere either). When looking at channel_post_port_listener() in channels.c, I found that nextstate was defined as : nextstate = (c->host_port == 0) ? SSH_CHANNEL_DYNAMIC : SSH_CHANNEL_OPENING; And later comes the call : if
2008 Sep 15
0
No subject
hello.. i am running openssh-3.7.1p2. on linux.It is working successfully..and daemon is running &client also connecting.But the problem is with the mips architecture when i connecting this server from remote syytem.?i got an error of buufer_get:trying to get more bytes 1 than buffer0.And client is not connecting from remote system.My out is as follows on my server ?in sshd main before
2001 Nov 06
13
OpenSSH 3.0
OpenSSH 3.0 has just been released. It will be available from the mirrors listed at http://www.openssh.com/ shortly. OpenSSH is a 100% complete SSH protocol version 1.3, 1.5 and 2.0 implementation and includes sftp client and server support. This release contains many portability bug-fixes (listed in the ChangeLog) as well as several new features (listed below). We would like to thank the
2008 Sep 18
2
SSHD_PROBLEM
hello.. i am running openssh-3.7.1p2. on linux.It is working successfully.and daemon is running &client also connecting.But the problem is with the mips architecture when i connecting this server from remote syytem. i got an error of buufer_get:trying to get more bytes 1 than buffer0.And client is not connecting from remote system.My out is as follows on my server in sshd main before
2002 May 11
4
socks5 support
> Winton-- > > Excellent! Absolutely wonderful. > > I'm wondering which apps/encapsulators support 4A? This gets me > around > the DNS leakage problem quite nicely. > > Incidentally, we do need SOCKS5 support -- if for no other > reason, the > fact that there's *operating system* level support in OSX for SOCKS5 > redirection. So
2001 Oct 17
3
Bug when flushing data in openssh 2.9
Hi! I am use SuSe 7.2 x86 and openssh-2.9p1-7.rpm I got a problem using bitkeeper on my laptop where bitkeeper reported an I/O error while reading data from 'ssh'. After much debugging, and some help from the bitkeeper people, I found out that that clientloop.c doesn't handle interrupts gracefully. (It died when it got an EAGAIN error when writing to the application) After applying
2003 Jun 24
8
Patch for Socks5 support for dynamic portforwaring?
Hi, has anybody seen a patch that provides socks version 5 support for the dynamic portforwarding feature? I?ve seen thats implemented in ssh.com?s ssh version, but found nothing about openssh. Only thing i found was a patch to provide socks4a. cu sleepi
2009 Dec 04
2
two questions about ssh tunneling
if I: ssh -fND localhost:6000 somebody at 192.168.56.5 -p PORTNUMBER from computer "A" to computer "B" [B = 192.168.56.5] then I can set the SOCKS proxy for e.g.: Firefox to use "localhost:6000" on computer "A". Ok. I can surf the web through "B". But: - Can anyone sniff the traffic of "A"? [e.g.: computers on same subnet as
2004 Aug 05
1
LocalForward and RemoteForward bind patch
FINALLY, it's here. You can now tell SSH which address to bind to for every single port forwarding option! This patch allows you to pass the following as ssh command line options: ssh -L 192.168.1.55:1234:localhost:80 -R ::11:22:aa:bb/80/localhost/80 etc. Or as normal config file options: LocalForward ::11:22:33/1234 localhost/80 RemoteForward 1.2.3.4:80 localhost:80 It will also
2003 Aug 12
1
[PATCH] Minor nit: -D is now "socks" not "socks4"
Hi all. I was getting something working over socks5 and was trying to figure out why it kept using socks4. It wasn't, it was just a misleading debug message.... Patch applies to either OpenBSD or Portable. -- Darren Tucker (dtucker at zip.com.au) GPG key 8FF4FA69 / D9A3 86E9 7EEE AF4B B2D4 37C9 C982 80C7 8FF4 FA69 Good judgement comes with experience. Unfortunately, the experience
2001 Feb 10
3
Protocol 2 remote forwarding patch
Hi all, I'm very new in this list, as looking for codes to plug up the lack of functionality of "Protocol 2 Remote Forwardig". Fortunately, I could find it in MARC's archive. Mr. Jarno Huuskonen posted the codes in Sept, last year, and I tried applying it to my FreeBSD box environment. I couldn't apply an original patch, of course, for incompatibility of virsion. The
2001 Oct 07
3
socks and misc patch to 2.9.9p2
Attached is a very small patch that allows the ssh clients to use the socks5 library. It should work with socks4 but is untested. Tested on linux only configure --with-socks configure --with-socks5 Also included is a configure option to disable scp statistics --disable-scp-stats modified files openssh-2.9.9p2/acconfig.h openssh-2.9.9p2/channels.c openssh-2.9.9p2/configure.in
2015 Jun 08
2
Re: Recommended change for the networking page in wiki
On 06/08/2015 02:43 PM, Laine Stump wrote: >> However, if I changed the destination address from "anywhere" to the >> IP of the host machine, the problem resolved. So I change the script >> to as follows. (Changes are highlighted. For some reason the original >> script didn't work using /bin/sh, but it did with /bin/bash, so I >> changed that too). >
2015 Jun 08
3
Recommended change for the networking page in wiki
Hello all, I was told on IRC that I should come here to discuss a recommended change on the networking page in the wiki. If you take a look at the "Basic Script" shown here: http://wiki.libvirt.org/page/Networking#Forwarding_Incoming_Connections It does two things: 1) Create a DNAT rule in the NAT table of IPTABLES 2) Create a FORWARD rule in the FILTER table of IPTABLES The FORWARD
2015 Jun 12
0
Re: Recommended change for the networking page in wiki
So should I go ahead and make the changes to the script that I suggested? Thanks, BJ On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> wrote: > On 06/08/2015 02:43 PM, Laine Stump wrote: > >> However, if I changed the destination address from "anywhere" to the > >> IP of the host machine, the problem resolved. So I change the script >