Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "ForceCommand and NFS-shared home directories"
2008 Mar 20
1
ForceCommand and ~/.ssh/rc
Hi,
As I understand the "ForceCommand" in the sshd_confing file is meant to
ignore any command supplied by the client, but if user's home is shared by
server and client machines over network (ex. NFS) then user can still put
something else into ~/.ssh/rc file and overcome this limitation. Is it
possible to disable execution of the ~/.ssh/rc file in such a case?
Thaks,
Mike
2008 Mar 23
1
openssh-unix-dev Digest, Vol 59, Issue 12
This problem can be solved by chowning the rc (and user conf files)
files to some other user and chmod'ing the group and other write bits
off. I say this because usually, when people use "ForceCommand" the
intention is to severely restrict a particular account. Going down
this path requires that you do a lot of homework around restricted
shells/profiles/etc. and changes you
2008 Aug 19
1
[patch] fix to ForceCommand to support additional arguments to internal-sftp
Hi,
This patch makes things like ForceCommand internal-sftp -l INFO work
(current code in 5.1 would just end the session). Please consider for
inclusion into mainline.
Michael.
--- /var/tmp/session.c 2008-08-18 21:07:10.000000000 -0700
+++ session.c 2008-08-18 21:12:51.000000000 -0700
@@ -781,7 +781,7 @@
if (options.adm_forced_command) {
original_command = command;
2009 May 18
6
[Bug 1599] New: "ForceCommand internal-sftp" not working as expected
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1599
Summary: "ForceCommand internal-sftp" not working as expected
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 5.2p1
Platform: ix86
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: sshd
AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org
2008 Aug 19
1
fixed: [patch] fix to ForceCommand to support additional arguments to internal-sftp
The previous version broke the case of internal-sftp without arguments. This
is a fixed version.
--- /var/tmp/session.c 2008-08-18 21:07:10.000000000 -0700
+++ session.c 2008-08-19 11:28:29.000000000 -0700
@@ -781,7 +781,7 @@
if (options.adm_forced_command) {
original_command = command;
command = options.adm_forced_command;
- if
2014 Sep 24
5
[Bug 2281] New: sshd accepts empty arguments in ForceCommand and VersionAddendum
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2281
Bug ID: 2281
Summary: sshd accepts empty arguments in ForceCommand and
VersionAddendum
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 6.6p1
Hardware: Other
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: sshd
2007 May 16
2
Disabling ForceCommand in a Match block
Hello,
I am trying to force a command for all users *except* for users in the
"wheel" group. My idea was to do the following in sshd_config:
ForceCommand /usr/bin/validate-ssh-command
Match Group wheel
ForceCommand
But obviously this doesn't work, because ForceCommand requires an
argument. I couldn't find a way to achieve what I want.
I wrote a patch that adds a
2008 Sep 23
3
[Bug 1527] New: ForceCommand internal-sftp needs a way to enable logging
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1527
Summary: ForceCommand internal-sftp needs a way to enable
logging
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 5.1p1
Platform: Itanium2
OS/Version: HP-UX
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P4
Component: sftp-server
AssignedTo:
2008 Jun 20
1
ForceCommand internal-sftp causes sftp logging to fail (openssh-5.0p1)
Hi guys,
I have a server setup with openssh-5.0p1 and use some users as
sftp-only chroot accounts.
The following configuration yields exactly the result I want:
user is chrooted, logs to syslog, all is good.
#================================================#
Subsystem sftp internal-sftp -f AUTHPRIV -l VERBOSE
Match User fredwww
ChrootDirectory %h
#ForceCommand internal-sftp
2007 Dec 20
1
ForceCommand - Subsystem
Hi All
First of all apologize for my bad English ? it is not my native language.
I'm using ssh for my everyday work. And I have noticed strange behaviour
in sshd daemon.
In sshd_config file there is option ForceCommand, and if I'm making sftp
connection it look like command is also executed, I receive error
message and connection is lost. In my opinion ForceCommand should not be
2015 Nov 01
4
[Bug 2486] New: allow ForceCommand none or similar
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2486
Bug ID: 2486
Summary: allow ForceCommand none or similar
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: -current
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P5
Component: sshd
Assignee: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org
2017 Mar 08
2
Logging with ForceCommand and SCP
Hello List,
I'am using the ForceCommand in my sshd configuration to log all the user
actions on my device.
ForceCommand /usr/bin/log-session.sh
The Log Session Script itself is working fine for logging.
But now I want also use SCP to copy files and this won't work together
with the ForceCommand above.
The copied file is created but its zero byte on the target.
scp file.tar.gz
2015 Nov 26
2
How disable forwarding-only connections (i.e. non-shell/command non-sftp connections)? (Maybe this is a feature request!)
Hi Peter,
What I am looking for is an SSHD configuration where every successfully
authenticated connection also guaranteedly will lead to a ForcedCommand
invocation.
Currently I understand this to be the case only for the connections that
open channel to deliver a terminal, command or SFTP (I don't know if you
have a collective name for such non-forwarding channels).
Is this possible?
2009 Jun 11
6
[Bug 1606] New: internal-sftp does not drop conections properly, it will hang
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1606
Summary: internal-sftp does not drop conections properly, it
will hang
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 5.2p1
Platform: Itanium
OS/Version: HP-UX
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: sshd
AssignedTo:
2012 May 17
2
New Subsystem criteria for Match option block in OpenSSH server
Hello everybody,
I'm a C/C++ consultant working for Ericsson.
I changed the OpenSSH-Portable code to add a new criteria
into the Match sshd_config option read by the sshd server.
The new criteria is "Subsystem"; so a conditional block based
on subsystem client request can now be added to the sshd_config
configuration server file to override settings in its global
section.
2011 Feb 20
1
openssh as a proxy: ForceCommand limitations & speed penalty
I've hit two roadblocks while using openssh -D as a general proxy:
- openssh doesn't have an internal-null, so the options are to either
give the user account a real shell and ForceCommand, or set the shell
to something like /bin/cat and ChrootDirectory. I don't want
proxy-only accounts to have a shell at all.
- Comparing mini-httpd SSL/aes256 vs mini-httpd (localhost/no SSL) via
2011 Jul 29
1
sshd’s ForceCommand and ssh’s "–N Do not execute a remote command"
Hallo.
If `sshd` is configured to have a ForceCommand, no `ssh ?N` must skip
this *forced* server?s setup, isn?t it?
But it isn?t so. Thus, admin may think that the command is forced by a server,
but user can skip that.
In such case only port forwarding is available, but anyway *force* is
meaningless, IMHO.
--
sed 'sed && sh + olecom = love'? <<? ''
-o--=O`C
2016 Feb 17
2
Using 'ForceCommand' Option
I would like to implement an arbitrary script to be executed when logging
on via SSH. This is supposedly possible using the ForceCommand option to
sshd. However, as soon as I implement any script, even as simple as echoing
a string, clients can no longer connect to the server. Clients report only
that the connection was dropped by the server. The server, in debug mode,
shows:
Feb 17 16:14:01
2020 Jun 23
4
SSH certificate and serverside ForceCommand
Hi,
We're developing an open source project that uses SSH certificates. We
issue short lived certificates (few minutes) to execute commands on behalf
of users. We have a use case where we need to issue certificates with 10
days validity and store them, so we put a command inside them:
ssh-keygen -s ca-key -I certN -n user -O force-command="wget something" -V
+10d user-key.pub
and
2016 Feb 17
5
Using 'ForceCommand' Option
Gert,
Thank you for the feedback. Can you give any further direction on where to
get more information on what you are describing?
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Gert Doering <gert at greenie.muc.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 12:59:57PM -0600, Lesley Kimmel wrote:
> > I would like to implement an arbitrary script to be executed when logging
> > on via