similar to: [PATCH] Out-of-band challenge (OBC) authentication method

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 500 matches similar to: "[PATCH] Out-of-band challenge (OBC) authentication method"

2008 Feb 06
2
[Bug 1438] New: Adds an out-of-band challenge (OBC) authentication method ( via kbdint)
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1438 Summary: Adds an out-of-band challenge (OBC) authentication method (via kbdint) Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.7p1 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: patch Severity: normal
2008 Feb 08
0
[PATCH] Virtual Token (VToken) challenge authentication method
The Virtual Token (VToken) patch (https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1439) creates a kbdint device that provides a new challenge-based authentication mechanism. The server calculates a challenge from two secrets and a counter. You authenticate by proving by correctly answering the challenge, proving you know the secrets. This creates a software-based token, similar in function to
2004 Apr 07
2
Requiring multiple auth mechanisms
I looked around for a while, but couldn't find any code for requiring multiple authentication mechanisms in openssh. So I wrote an implemention. I thought at first I should change the PasswordAuthentication, PubkeyAuthentication, etc. keywords to allow no/yes/required. But there's some funky stuff in auth2.c with respect to keyboard interactive auth that would make this kind of
2009 Nov 12
2
[LLVMdev] Crash in PBQP register allocator
Hi, Please see the two ".ll' files attached. Command line used llc -march=pic16 -pre-RA-sched=list-burr -regalloc=pbqp new.obc The above test case crashes only when I use the combination of list-burr scheduler and pbqp register allocator. If any of them (scheduler or register allocator) is replaced with some alternate then I don't see the crash. I could not figure
2009 Nov 13
0
[LLVMdev] Crash in PBQP register allocator
This looks like a bug in the PBQP solver. I'm currently investigating. Cheers, Lang. On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:46 AM, <Sachin.Punyani at microchip.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > > Please see the two “.ll’ files attached. > > > > Command line used > > llc –march=pic16  –pre-RA-sched=list-burr –regalloc=pbqp new.obc > > > > The above test case
2007 Dec 02
1
speeding up likelihood computation
R Users: I am trying to estimate a model of fertility behaviour using birth history data with maximum likelihood. My code works but is extremely slow (because of several for loops and my programming inefficiencies); when I use the genetic algorithm to optimize the likelihood function, it takes several days to complete (on a machine with Intel Core 2 processor [2.66GHz] and 2.99 GB RAM). Computing
2005 Oct 31
1
R-functions in C-Code
Dear R users, I would like to use several R functions from a C-code and I have read the "Introduction to the .C Interface to R". Unfortunately, my shared library with the C-code works only in cases where I use R-routines that are defined Rmath.h, eg. ************************************* less test.c: #include <R.h> #include <Rinternals.h> #include <Rmath.h> void
2008 Feb 02
2
[PATCH] Requiring multiple auth mechanisms (updated)
Jefferson Ogata's patch http://marc.info/?l=openssh-unix-dev&m=108134938701018&w=2 adds a multiple authentication methods option to sshd. I updated the patch to 4.7p1 and added logic to allow it to work with privilege separation. https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1435 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name:
2009 Nov 15
2
[LLVMdev] Crash in PBQP register allocator
Hi Sachin, Confirmed: This is being caused by a subtle issue in the heuristic PBQP solver. Specifically: R1/R2 reductions as currently implemented can, on rare occasions, lead to the heuristic solver failing to find a finite cost solution, even though one exists. The infinite cost solution will always be in violation of some rule of register allocation (failing to handle an interference, or
2009 Nov 17
0
[LLVMdev] Crash in PBQP register allocator
Thanks Lang! I think we can use linear scan as work around for short term. Thanks for your help. Regards Sachin > -----Original Message----- > From: Lang Hames [mailto:lhames at gmail.com] > Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2009 10:08 AM > To: Sachin Punyani - I00202 > Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Crash in PBQP register allocator > > Hi Sachin, >
2008 Feb 08
3
[Bug 1439] New: Adds Virtual Token (VToken) authentication method to kbdint
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1439 Summary: Adds Virtual Token (VToken) authentication method to kbdint Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.7p1 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: patch Severity: normal Priority: P2
2008 Feb 08
3
[Bug 1439] New: Adds Virtual Token (VToken) authentication method to kbdint
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1439 Summary: Adds Virtual Token (VToken) authentication method to kbdint Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.7p1 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: patch Severity: normal Priority: P2
2009 Dec 15
0
[LLVMdev] Crash in PBQP register allocator
Hi Sachin, Yes. Bernhard Scholz and I have just discussed a fix for this. I hope to commit it in the next few days. I will let you know as soon as it goes in to the mainline. Regards, Lang. On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 5:34 PM, <Sachin.Punyani at microchip.com> wrote: > Hi Lang, > > Thanks for your inputs on the problem. I was just curious to know if you > got any opportunity to
2009 Dec 15
2
[LLVMdev] Crash in PBQP register allocator
Hi Lang, Thanks for your inputs on the problem. I was just curious to know if you got any opportunity to work on the solution for this. Regards Sachin > -----Original Message----- > From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On > Behalf Of Sachin.Punyani at microchip.com > Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 12:00 PM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Crash
2010 Jan 26
3
[LLVMdev] Crash in PBQP register allocator
Hi Sachin, llvm-dev, I've just committed a new PBQP solver which, among other things, should take care of this bug. Please let me know how it works out for you. Cheers, Lang. On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Lang Hames <lhames at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Sachin, > > Yes. Bernhard Scholz and I have just discussed a fix for this. I hope to > commit it in the next few days. I
2010 Jan 28
0
[LLVMdev] Crash in PBQP register allocator
Hi Lang, I'm surprised about the fact that you omit R1/R2 reductions in some cases. Can you give a more detailed description of the bug (e.g. a PBQP dump)? Best regards, Sebastian Lang Hames wrote: > Hi Sachin, llvm-dev, > > I've just committed a new PBQP solver which, among other things, > should take care of this bug. > > Please let me know how it works out for you.
2007 Jun 05
1
Mgetty for out of band management - which modem?
Hi, We're thinking of using Mgetty and a modem to allow us some out of band management access to sites if the ADSL connection fails... Just wondered if anyone had a recommended USB modem they've used on Centos/Mgetty as Hayes compatible serial modems seem to be quite rare these days?
2007 Jan 04
0
[HTB] Individual band for each IP in an IP range
Hello, I''m using shorewall at the moment, but I''m asking this because I''m thinking on switching to htb from a script if this isn''t possible from shorewall. Is it possible to get HTB to treat each individual IP in an IP range as a separate leaf, so I don''t have to insert a separate HTB rule for every new user? Thanks a bunch, Iscu.
2010 Mar 27
0
data fitting and confidence band
Hello, I am fitting data using different methods e.g. Local Polynomial and Smoothing splines. The data is generated out of a true function model with added normally distributed noise. I would like to know "how often the confidence band for all points simultaneously contain all true values". I can answer the question for one point in the following way: e.g. #
2011 Sep 13
0
nls, the four parameter logistic equation, and prediction band
The error msg is telling you that R cannot evaluate the loss function, so you should not expect answers. You might try examining the data -- Are there NA or Inf entries? Or prepare a dataframe with just X and Y, sort by X and graph. Then check the nls computations by sampling, say, every 100 X's to give you a dataset with about 160 observations. If that doesn't work, it is at least