similar to: Optional 'test' or benchmark cipher

>From what I can gather from googling, using rsync over ssh without a cipher is not possible since some changes to the openssh package. ?Is this true? ?I have been using a CPU friendly cipher but feel that it is best to use no cipher at all (secured network). rsync -avxu --progress -e 'ssh -c arcfour128' /path/to/source/ user at server:/path/to/destination/ Thanks in advance!

Hello, Does anybody know how cam I enable the usage of the 'none' cipher in OpenSSH 4.7 yours, Mihai

The HPN12 patch available from http://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/hpn-ssh addresses performance issues with bulk data transfer over high bandwidth delay paths. By adjusting internal flow control buffers to better fit the outstanding data capacity of the path significant improvements in bulk data throughput performance are achieved. In other words, transfers over the internet are a lot

Hello, I know this has come up before; but is the HPN patch (or elements thereof) currently being considered for integration in to the OpenSSH code base? Are there pending issues (buffer management, none cipher, etc) which still need to be addressed? We have been using HPN-SSH for over a year now, and like others, have observed significant performance improvement over standard OpenSSH. I can

Linda Walsh <flac at tlinx.org> wrote: ... > That brings up another question then... What is 'hi' (v. low?)... Zero, or close to zero, is low. 12 is high. ... > What's a subset stream? This is explained at: http://flac.sourceforge.net/format.html in the bulleted point beginning, "FLAC specifies a subset of itself as the Subset format." ... > Another

Hi, I tried different encryptions like arc four, but always with the same result. BTW: googling shows some similar questions and they are stuck on set same speed +-. But non of that solutions helped me. /G?tz > Am 11.08.2015 um 12:14 schrieb Eero Volotinen <eero.volotinen at iki.fi>: > > Usually problem in encryption. > > try cipher arcfour or apply hpn patches to

I know i''m probably doing something REALLY stupid.....but for some reason i can''t get send/recv to work over ssh. I just built a new media server and i''d like to move a few filesystem from my old server to my new server but for some reason i keep getting strange errors... At first i''d see something like this: pfexec: can''t get real path of

Emmanuel Florac wrote: > id TESTAD\\testuser > returns "no such user" and > > getent passwd TESTAD\\testuser > > returns a "2" code. > ---- On linux, to get 'domain\user' to resolve, I had to have those entries in my /etc/passwd (and /etc/group for groups). I.e. *w/o krb*, (in samba 3.x), I had entries like:

Emmanuel Florac via samba wrote: > Unknown parameter encountered: "winbind enumerate users" > Ignoring unknown parameter "winbind enumerate users" > Unknown parameter encountered: "winbind enumerate groups" > Ignoring unknown parameter "winbind enumerate groups" It may be irrelevant, but I have: winbind enum groups = Yes winbind enum users

In the smb.conf manpage, there is a notation used, (G) or (S) for global or share. Does (S) mean it can only be used in a Share section (i.e. - will be ignored in the global section), or is that they *can* be applied at the share level, and, possibly set a default in the 'G'lobal section? example: "ea support = yes" Seems like that could mean that extended attrs are

Assuming in a secure and trusted env, we want to get the maximum transfer speed without the overhead from ssh. Thanks. Fred -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zfs-discuss/attachments/20121213/654f543f/attachment-0001.html>

http://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/hpn-ssh/ Mike Stevens and I just released a new set of high performance networking patches for OpenSSH 3.9p1, 4.0p1, and 4.1p1. These patches will provide the same set of functionality across all 3 revisions. New functionality includes 1) HPN performance even without both sides of the connection being HPN enabled. As long as the bulk data flow is in the

Hi We are building a Linux app under Centos 5.3, using gnu make 3.81 and gcc 4.12. The working directory is on a remote machine and is either a Samba share or a Windows 7 share. We find that in the case of a Windows 7 share the resulting executable has the sticky bit set in group: On Windows 7 share: -rwxrwSrwx 1 <snip> myapp On Samba share: -rwxrwx--x+ 1 <snip> myapp The

Hello list, right now SSH Tunnel / scp is reaches just around 76Mb/s on my E5 Xeon using AES-NI but openssl reaches around 600-700Mb/s using 128aes-cbc cipher. As far as i understand http://www.psc.edu/index.php/hpn-ssh this is due to very small buffers in ssh / scp. Is there any work on this? Like autotuning the buffer size? Are there plans to integrate the hpn patches? Greets, Stefan

Hello, I know that this has been asked before, just wanted to mention that I, too, would like to see the HPN SSH functionality incorporated in the standard OpenSSH. Would there be technical disadvantages integrating the changes? I know we are all pretty busy, but I would certainly spend time to help, e.g. with testing, documentation, etc. Cheers --pwo -- Peter W. Osel - http://pwo.de/ - pwo

Rebooted my system for a windows update. When it came back up, It said the trust between my workstation and DC was broken. (Running Windows 7x64 SP1). Very odd, haven't seen that for a while. I thought it would be easy: unjoin/rejoin. But upon trying to rejoin, I get: The join operation was not successful. This could be because an existing computer account having name 'ANY'

Was there some reason that patch got dropped? Otherwise rsync eats up all the buffer memory. Note -- I tried directio -- didn't work due to alignment issues -- buffers have to be aligned to sectors. The kernel, if I remember correctly, has been on again/off again on requiring alignment on directio -- because most of the drivers and devices do for directio to work, at. "dd"

Hi, i have two servers, connected to to the lan by 10Gb with 10Gb and DAS hardware raid. Each system con read and write locally or to the 10G iscsi by more than 200 MB/s. Now I have to transfer backups form A to B and doing this with rsync always stuck at +- 48-50MB/s no matter which options, compressions, encryption etc I use. Even the plain default rsync is at that 50 Mb limit. coyp by scp

what does the exhaustive model search do? Does it try all of the functions listed under "-A" to find the 'best', i.e. bartlett, bartlett_hann, blackman, blackman_har- ris_4term_92db, connes, flattop, gauss(STDDEV), hamming, hann, kaiser_bessel, nuttall, rectangle, triangle, tukey(P), welch. Or is that something else? I've been using the -e option for a while in

Hi, I'd like to argue in favor of bug #877 ( https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=877) from a new perspective. Instead of performance, I wish to raise the issue of regulatory compliance and auditing. I read all of #877 and I understand the arguments for and against, but I felt at the end the decisive comment by Damien was mostly based on 'We don't want users to use