similar to: how to test the performance of modified openssh

https://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/hpn-ssh/hpn-v-ssh-tput.jpg "SCP and the underlying SSH2 protocol implementation in OpenSSH is network performance limited by statically defined internal flow control buffers. These buffers often end up acting as a bottleneck for network throughput of SCP, especially on long and high bandwith network links. Modifying the ssh code to allow the buffers

Howdy, As a note, we now have HPN patch for OpenSSH 4.2 at http://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/hpn-ssh/ Its still part of the last set of patches (HPN11) so there aren't any additional changes in the code. It patches, configures, compiles, and passes make tests without a problem. I've not done extensive testing for this version of openssh but I don't foresee any problems. I

http://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/hpn-ssh/ Mike Stevens and I just released a new set of high performance networking patches for OpenSSH 3.9p1, 4.0p1, and 4.1p1. These patches will provide the same set of functionality across all 3 revisions. New functionality includes 1) HPN performance even without both sides of the connection being HPN enabled. As long as the bulk data flow is in the

Hello list, right now SSH Tunnel / scp is reaches just around 76Mb/s on my E5 Xeon using AES-NI but openssl reaches around 600-700Mb/s using 128aes-cbc cipher. As far as i understand http://www.psc.edu/index.php/hpn-ssh this is due to very small buffers in ssh / scp. Is there any work on this? Like autotuning the buffer size? Are there plans to integrate the hpn patches? Greets, Stefan

Hi, I tried different encryptions like arc four, but always with the same result. BTW: googling shows some similar questions and they are stuck on set same speed +-. But non of that solutions helped me. /G?tz > Am 11.08.2015 um 12:14 schrieb Eero Volotinen <eero.volotinen at iki.fi>: > > Usually problem in encryption. > > try cipher arcfour or apply hpn patches to

Hi, http://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/hpn-ssh/ Clearly, the HPN patches significantly boost throughput performance. This enhancement is entirely from tuning the SSH buffer sizes. Alex Tavcar

Hi, i have two servers, connected to to the lan by 10Gb with 10Gb and DAS hardware raid. Each system con read and write locally or to the 10G iscsi by more than 200 MB/s. Now I have to transfer backups form A to B and doing this with rsync always stuck at +- 48-50MB/s no matter which options, compressions, encryption etc I use. Even the plain default rsync is at that 50 Mb limit. coyp by scp

Hello, I know this has come up before; but is the HPN patch (or elements thereof) currently being considered for integration in to the OpenSSH code base? Are there pending issues (buffer management, none cipher, etc) which still need to be addressed? We have been using HPN-SSH for over a year now, and like others, have observed significant performance improvement over standard OpenSSH. I can

The HPN12 patch available from http://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/hpn-ssh addresses performance issues with bulk data transfer over high bandwidth delay paths. By adjusting internal flow control buffers to better fit the outstanding data capacity of the path significant improvements in bulk data throughput performance are achieved. In other words, transfers over the internet are a lot

I have a customer who is complaining about slow SFTP transfers over a long haul connection. The current transfer rate is limited by the TCP window size and the RTT. I looked at HPN-SSH, but that won't work because we don't control what software the peer is using. I was thinking about coding a much more modest enhancement that just does SO_RCVBUF for specific subsystems. In the interest

Dear folks, To me suspend and resume is not a fancy feature. It is a must have like all the other conveniences and simplicity that scp provides. I agree with Damien that this will cause multiple protocol versions to float around, but we can't make omelettes without breaking eggs. The question is how important is this feature? I would say it is very basic compared to other fancy features

Dear CentOS lovers, Could you consider to include a patch, http://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/hpn-ssh/ for openssh maybe as CentosPlus packages? It has great speed impact for long-distance ( high delay ) transfer. Regards, Yuji Tsuchimoto

Hello, I have paid attention to the issue about the X509-based certificate support in standard openssh. Because I also need the support of X509-based certificates in my project, and also I have developed specific version of openssh to pass the proxy certificate from client to server. But I used the PAM module to verify the proxy and authorize the accessors. I wonder whether current support in

I''ve tried ssh blowfish and scp arcfour. both are CPU limited long before the 10g link is. I''vw also tried mbuffer, but I get broken pipe errors part way through the transfer. I''m open to ideas for faster ways to to either zfs send directly or through a compressed file of the zfs send output. For the moment I; zfs send > pigz scp arcfour the file gz file to the

If anyone is using the HPN patch on a high performance link I was wondering if you could take a moment to answer a quick question Are you seeing vastly different performance between scp throughput and sftp throughput? On my test network (pittsburgh to chicago) I'm getting 26MB/s with scp (arcfour) and only 6.4MB/s with sftp (arcfour). We just started looking into this but it woudl be nice

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1337 Summary: SCP performance twice as slow as RCP Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.8.1p1 Platform: Other OS/Version: AIX Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: scp AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org ReportedBy:

Hi everyone, has anybody successfully integrated the patches from http://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/hpn-ssh/ into openssh, and maybe produced a .spec file for this purpose that s/he is willing to share? thx, Kay

Hello Are there plans to merge the hpn-ssh (http://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/hpn-ssh/) and the LPK (http://code.google.com/p/openssh-lpk/) into the mainline openssh. Adding lpk has been logged as a bug in bugzilla as They are two patches that I always apply as the performance boost from hpn-ssh is substantial to say the least, and centralisation of the authorized_keys into a LDAP server

Hello All, As the release notes of SSH-4.7 version says that a new MAC algorithm (UMAC-64 - RFC4418) was introduced with OpenSSH-4.7 which gives much better performance, I was tempted to check out the enhanced speed provided with new version. So I downloaded OpenSSH-5.1p1 and build it on Solaris 10 with Sun Compiler CC. My test setup:- 1. Two Sunfire 440 with 2 CPU (1281 MHz) and 4GB RAM. 2.

On Wed, 6 Nov 2024, Chris Rapier wrote: > I think I know the answer to this (which would be that you can't) but is there > any not entirely insane way to get the ssh->compat information back to either > scp or sftp? There's no way at present. > I'm doing some extensions on scp (and eventually sftp) and having remote > version or capability information would be