similar to: HPN SSH

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "HPN SSH"

2005 Sep 08
1
HPN Patch for OpenSSH 4.2p1 Available
Howdy, As a note, we now have HPN patch for OpenSSH 4.2 at http://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/hpn-ssh/ Its still part of the last set of patches (HPN11) so there aren't any additional changes in the code. It patches, configures, compiles, and passes make tests without a problem. I've not done extensive testing for this version of openssh but I don't foresee any problems. I
2007 Nov 09
1
HPN SSH
Hello, I know that this has been asked before, just wanted to mention that I, too, would like to see the HPN SSH functionality incorporated in the standard OpenSSH. Would there be technical disadvantages integrating the changes? I know we are all pretty busy, but I would certainly spend time to help, e.g. with testing, documentation, etc. Cheers --pwo -- Peter W. Osel - http://pwo.de/ - pwo
2009 Feb 17
1
Support for merging LPK and hpn-ssh into mainline openssh?
Hello Are there plans to merge the hpn-ssh (http://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/hpn-ssh/) and the LPK (http://code.google.com/p/openssh-lpk/) into the mainline openssh. Adding lpk has been logged as a bug in bugzilla as They are two patches that I always apply as the performance boost from hpn-ssh is substantial to say the least, and centralisation of the authorized_keys into a LDAP server
2006 May 19
1
New HPN Patch Released
The HPN12 patch available from http://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/hpn-ssh addresses performance issues with bulk data transfer over high bandwidth delay paths. By adjusting internal flow control buffers to better fit the outstanding data capacity of the path significant improvements in bulk data throughput performance are achieved. In other words, transfers over the internet are a lot
2006 Mar 25
1
High Performance SSH/SCP - HPN-SSH when?
Hi, http://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/hpn-ssh/ Clearly, the HPN patches significantly boost throughput performance. This enhancement is entirely from tuning the SSH buffer sizes. Alex Tavcar
2006 Feb 01
0
HPN patch for OpenSSH 4.3 released
http://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/hpn-ssh There have been some changes to the command line switches which are detailed on the website. This is more of a stop gap release than anything else. This is still in the HPN-11 cycle of patches. We hope to have an update to HPN-12 out sometime in March (when I can get some freetime). This will conform more closely to the OpenSSH nomenclature and
2007 Sep 05
0
HPN Patch for OpenSSH 4.7 Available
The HPN-SSH patch set for OpenSSH 4.7 is now available from http://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/hpn-ssh/openssh-4.7p1-hpn12v18.diff.gz Its passes all regression tests and my personal sets of tests. We do not introduce any new functionality. However, I expect this is an interim release. I hope to have some relatively minor modification available in the next month. These will mostly deal
2005 Mar 25
1
New HPN patch released for 3.9
We've released a new HPN (High Performance Network) patch for OpenSSH 3.9p1. We've made two major changes - first off we backed out of all the modifications we made to buffer.c. Turns out that it just wasn't necessary once we fixed a nagging bug in channels.c. I also made a minor change to the buffer sizes in the source and sink functions in scp.c Increasing the size of both
2013 Jan 02
1
ssh / scp slow on 10GBE
Hello list, right now SSH Tunnel / scp is reaches just around 76Mb/s on my E5 Xeon using AES-NI but openssl reaches around 600-700Mb/s using 128aes-cbc cipher. As far as i understand http://www.psc.edu/index.php/hpn-ssh this is due to very small buffers in ssh / scp. Is there any work on this? Like autotuning the buffer size? Are there plans to integrate the hpn patches? Greets, Stefan
2007 Aug 21
1
High Performance SSH/SCP - HPN-SSH
Dear CentOS lovers, Could you consider to include a patch, http://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/hpn-ssh/ for openssh maybe as CentosPlus packages? It has great speed impact for long-distance ( high delay ) transfer. Regards, Yuji Tsuchimoto
2005 Jul 28
1
People using the HPN patch...
If anyone is using the HPN patch on a high performance link I was wondering if you could take a moment to answer a quick question Are you seeing vastly different performance between scp throughput and sftp throughput? On my test network (pittsburgh to chicago) I'm getting 26MB/s with scp (arcfour) and only 6.4MB/s with sftp (arcfour). We just started looking into this but it woudl be nice
2019 Dec 12
4
Controlling SO_RCVBUF
I have a customer who is complaining about slow SFTP transfers over a long haul connection. The current transfer rate is limited by the TCP window size and the RTT. I looked at HPN-SSH, but that won't work because we don't control what software the peer is using. I was thinking about coding a much more modest enhancement that just does SO_RCVBUF for specific subsystems. In the interest
2006 Mar 16
0
New Version of HPN-SSH Patch
[NB: General information regarding HPN-SSH can be found at http://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/hpn-ssh ] This is a beta release of HPN12 but I'd like to get some user experiences with it if anyone is so inclined. This version of the HPN patch more closely conforms to the openssh nomenclature and coding style, it eliminates the use of command line switches in favor of -o options, it
2011 Feb 06
3
OpenSSH could be faster...then why don't they path it??
https://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/hpn-ssh/hpn-v-ssh-tput.jpg "SCP and the underlying SSH2 protocol implementation in OpenSSH is network performance limited by statically defined internal flow control buffers. These buffers often end up acting as a bottleneck for network throughput of SCP, especially on long and high bandwith network links. Modifying the ssh code to allow the buffers
2005 Jun 17
3
New Set of High Performance Networking Patches Available
http://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/hpn-ssh/ Mike Stevens and I just released a new set of high performance networking patches for OpenSSH 3.9p1, 4.0p1, and 4.1p1. These patches will provide the same set of functionality across all 3 revisions. New functionality includes 1) HPN performance even without both sides of the connection being HPN enabled. As long as the bulk data flow is in the
2007 Mar 12
0
HPN patch now available for OpenSSH 4.6
The HPN patch set has been updated to work with OpenSSH4.6. This patch can help improve performance of bulk data transfers when using SSH, SCP, or SFTP. Please see http://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/hpn-ssh for more information. The patch is available from the above address or directly with http://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/hpn-ssh/openssh-4.6p1-hpn12v16.diff.gz If you have any
2007 May 05
1
[Bug 1311] Performance on high BDP networks
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1311 Summary: Performance on high BDP networks Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.6p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Build system AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org ReportedBy: imorgan at
2006 Sep 29
0
HPN-SSH for OpenSSH 4.4p1 Available
This is a preliminary release and as such should be used at your own risk. In my testing the application builds under OS X and Linux, passes the regression tests, and file transfer tests on our test connections exhibited a 1600% increase in performance (1.4MB/s versus 20.9MB/s 46ms RTT). This patch (hpn12v10) is available from
2006 Nov 14
0
HPN Patch for 4.5p1 Released
Just so you know the HPN-SSH patch for 4.5p1 has been released at http://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/hpn-ssh The 4.4p1 patch also works against 4.5p1. The 4.5p1 patch just addresses some line moves for a cleaner patch.
2008 Apr 01
0
HPN-SSH for OpenSSH 4.9 Available
HPN-SSH is a set of high performance patches which add dynamic window sizing, none cipher switching, enhanced server logging, and a multi-threaded cipher implementation to OpenSSH. We've just updated the patches to the OpenSSH 4.9 release and made them available from http://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/hpn-ssh/ Comments, questions, and criticisms are always welcome. Thanks for your