similar to: [PATCH 0/6] openssh V_4_6: minor fixes/cleanups

Using these escapes, the include directive can be crafted to include differing, host-specific configuration. Ronan Pigott (2): Permit %L and %l percent escapes in ssh Include Permit %L and %l percent escapes in sshd Include readconf.c | 16 +++++++++++++--- servconf.c | 17 ++++++++++++++--- 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) base-commit:

This allows the localhost percent-style escapes in arguments to the Include directive. These are useful for including host-specific ssh configuration. --- readconf.c | 16 +++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/readconf.c b/readconf.c index a2282b562df0..ad47d0e9730a 100644 --- a/readconf.c +++ b/readconf.c @@ -1030,7 +1030,8 @@

Any ideas of the best way around this problem? Should I just hack the source code, or is there a magic switch somewhere I'm missing? I'm assuming I can't just dismiss that function as OpenSSH is probably based on the OpenBSD semantics. ============================================================================= gcc -g -O2 -Wall -Wno-uninitialized -I. -I.

Hi, Just a usecase that I'm sure has been covered before but just in case its not an openssh solution would be very helpful. I was trying to install software on a server that was firewalled so no outbound http connections would work. I was also tunnelling via another server. Outbound ssh connections also were a convenient option. What would have been nice would be a remote version of

ssh client has the ability to set the destination of debug logs via the `-E` flag. ssh_config lacks an equivalent keyword to set the same option via configs. This patch follows the same semantics of other `*Path` type keywords and creates a new ssh_config keyword `LogPath`. [0] Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3683 [1] GitHub PR:

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1829 Summary: auth-rsa.c: move auth_key_is_revoked() call from auth_rsa_verify_response() to auth_rsa_key_allowed() Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.6p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component:

What are the likely cockpit errors involved when getting POOR results when running this test on an updated CentOS 5.2? Kind regards/ldv [root at shell ~]# dig +short porttest.dns-oarc.net TXT z.y.x.w.v.u.t.s.r.q.p.o.n.m.l.k.j.i.h.g.f.e.d.c.b.a.pt.dns-oarc.net. "a.b.c.d is POOR: 26 queries in 1.3 seconds from 1 ports with std dev 0.00"

thanks/ldv

Mem: 2075040k total, 1331452k used, 743588k free, 50896k buffers Swap: 2031608k total, 144k used, 2031464k free, 1191532k cached SunFire X2100 running Centos 4.3. Linux maytag1.texoma.net 2.6.9-34.0.2.EL #1 Fri Jul 7 19:24:57 CDT 2006 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux rgds/ldv

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=454 ------- Additional Comments From ldv@altlinux.org 2006-03-02 00:39 MET ------- Created an attachment (id=220) --> (https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=220&action=view) iptables-1.3.5-alt-link.patch Proposed patch. FC iptables package also attempts to address this issue, but their approach is worse: it

Came across this page... intended to showcase the high-end capabilities of WMV9... http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowsmedia/content_provider/film/ContentShowcase.aspx Just thought some people might be interested in it to make some comparisons... and it's also probably some of the highest quality sample material i've found on the net... so it's also useful for me to use as

libssl.so.4 was erased by accident and now, e.g., iinvoking wget results in: wget: error while loading shared libraries: libssl.so.4: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory [root at mail src]# How does one go about restoring libssl.so.4? [I've tried Google, compiling current edition from source, yum install, but note 'yum remove openssl' would take out about 140

Hi I have very special needs and i wanted to use rsync over ssh. I don't know if a solution already exists for what i want to do. I want to provide rsync over ssh to my users. Howevern i want to have the following limitations : 1. No shell access 2. Limitting users to their home directories I was thinking to the folowing solution, but i don't know if it is secure enough : Create a

Hello, Is anyone else having problems with the ssh session output stalling when ssh'd to another system and the command is running via sudo and a pager is being used (e.g., more)? Too highly reproducible :( to date, all known occurrences have involved Centos 4.3 servers; makes no difference whether client is RHEL WS 4.3, Centos 4.3 or FC 5 or WinDoze. Makes no difference if terminal

Second revision of the VMware VMCI RFC patchset. It incorperates fixes for all the feedback about the comment blocks and style and now passes checkpatch with 0 errors and 0 warnings. Thanks to all who have reviewed the code thus far. * * * In an effort to improve the out-of-the-box experience with Linux kernels for VMware users, VMware is working on readying the Virtual Machine Communication

Second revision of the VMware VMCI RFC patchset. It incorperates fixes for all the feedback about the comment blocks and style and now passes checkpatch with 0 errors and 0 warnings. Thanks to all who have reviewed the code thus far. * * * In an effort to improve the out-of-the-box experience with Linux kernels for VMware users, VMware is working on readying the Virtual Machine Communication

In an effort to improve the out-of-the-box experience with Linux kernels for VMware users, VMware is working on readying the Virtual Machine Communication Interface (vmw_vmci) and VMCI Sockets (vmw_vsock) kernel modules for inclusion in the Linux kernel. The purpose of this post is to acquire feedback on the vmw_vmci kernel module. The vmw_vsock kernel module will be presented in a later post.

In an effort to improve the out-of-the-box experience with Linux kernels for VMware users, VMware is working on readying the Virtual Machine Communication Interface (vmw_vmci) and VMCI Sockets (vmw_vsock) kernel modules for inclusion in the Linux kernel. The purpose of this post is to acquire feedback on the vmw_vmci kernel module. The vmw_vsock kernel module will be presented in a later post.

Hello CentOS Community Members, What is RH's be-all end-all justification for staying with an ancient code base for such important programs as BIND et al? A similar problem (to BZ561299) was first reported five (5) years ago on the isc.org mailing list. Is there any support among the CentOS community for a REPO of current vintage for such important functions as BIND et al? That question is

In an effort to improve the out-of-the-box experience with Linux kernels for VMware users, VMware is working on readying the Virtual Machine Communication Interface (vmw_vmci) and VMCI Sockets (vmw_vsock) kernel modules for inclusion in the Linux kernel. The purpose of this post is to acquire feedback on the vmw_vmci kernel module. The vmw_vsock kernel module will be presented in a later post.