similar to: tunneling through stdin/stdout, source routing

I found that the documentation for -L and -R was hard to understand. So I made some changes to try to make it clearer. I started with Revision 1.328 from http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/usr.bin/ssh/ssh.1 Comments welcome. ================ ssh.1.patch ================ --- ssh.1 2012/09/15 16:08:48 1.1 +++ ssh.1 2012/09/15 20:23:35 @@ -51,13 +51,13 @@ .Op Fl F Ar configfile .Op Fl I

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413 Summary: Port forwarding: [localhost:]localport:remotehost:remoteport Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: older versions Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo:

server is running openssh 4.6p1 on linux x86 (32bit) client is running openssh 4.6p1 on linux x86_64 (64bit) Just connecting from the client to the server and running "top" long enough results in: Disconnecting: Bad packet length 3690378913. This seems like a 32/64 bit problem to me. -- Andreas Steinmetz SPAMmers use robotrap at domdv.de

Hi, i have qmail + vpopmail + dovecot + squirrelmail 0.99.14 on Fedora Core 4. Qmail includes its own pop3 server, and everybody is able to access it from outside. Dovecot is used only locally by SquirrelMail - so everybody can access via webmail. I'd like to make imap directly available from outside, but only for a few selected domains (NOT ip addresses!), while leaving everyone able to

As far as I have been able to figure out, dovecot auth always works over a Unix domain socket. I believe it is not currently possible to operate dovecot auth over an Internet domain (TCP) socket. Am I correct? I want to call dovecot's exported authentication from a Java application. Java doesn't natively know how to talk to a Unix domain socket, so there are inconveniences. There

Without an assigned source port, Transmit function assign a random new source port to the packet being sent. It thus have to be set before calling Transmit if the source port have already been decided. Conversly, we have to save the assigned port to reuse it later if needed. Resolve bug #35. Signed-off-by: Celelibi <celelibi at gmail.com> --- efi/udp.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file

When attempting to build syslinux in parallel (make -j5), I encountered the following error at the end: rm -f liblpxelinux.a ar cq liblpxelinux.a rawcon.o ./fs/pxe/dhcp_option.o ./fs/pxe/pxe.o ./fs/pxe/tftp.o ./fs/pxe/urlparse.o ./lwip/src/netif/ethernetif.o ./lwip/src/netif/etharp.o ./lwip/src/netif/slipif.o ./lwip/src/netif/ppp/md5.o ./lwip/src/netif/ppp/randm.o ./lwip/src/netif/ppp/chpms.o

from: Jeff Sloan <jeff_sloan at selinc.com> Update UEFI PXE proxyDHCP handling. This patch is based on commit ID 8a00e49 Modify two files to specify valid ip addresses. These files are efi/pxe.c and efi/udp.c. In efi/pxe.c: In net_parse_dhcp function. If ProxyOffer has been received, start with DhcpAck packet since it is the most complete. This requires a minimum of changes to the

I did change both instances of txdata->GatewayAddress, but I think something may be wrong in my toolchain. If I extract syslinux.zip and attempt to make from there (without modifying any files), the cached DHCP packet isn't read on the same subnet. I receive "Succeed to download NBP file." twice before anything from syslinux is loaded, so I believe the duplicate request for

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3133 Bug ID: 3133 Summary: Dynamically Assigned Ports for DynamicForward and LocalForward Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 8.2p1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: ssh

Rafael, Filipe, I am looking at the fixes you apply to sanitizer tests and they worry me. (e.g. https://reviews.llvm.org/D31498) The fixes are mostly mechanical and thus every single change looks safe, but given the amount of changes there is large risk to cripple some of the tests in a way that they will stop detecting failures. When I write a test for new functionality, I always verify that

Greetings, I want to create a set of rules that will be in affect when I connection originates from outside of my local lan (internet) and on a specific port, this is what I've wrote: Match LocalPort 11111, Address *,!10.0.0.0/24 but when I start ssh, I get this error: Invalid LocalPort '11111,' on Match line /etc/ssh/sshd_config line 176: Bad Match condition why is that? how can I

Hi , I have the following requirement . other than following users, any other user sshd connection should be redirected to 2024 instead of port 22. root, ftp, guest So ssh root at ip // should be sent to sshd running at port 22 ssh otheruser at ip // should be sent to sshd running at port 2024 I know that we can do something like this: ssh -o ProxyCommand='ssh -W localhost:2024 cliuser

On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 9:34 PM, Celelibi <celelibi at gmail.com> wrote: >> Without an assigned source port, Transmit function assign a random new >> source port to the packet being sent. It thus have to be set before >> calling Transmit if the source port have already been decided.

On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Jason Matthews <jason.david.matthews at gmail.com> wrote: > The setup I was using was in a chassis. Slot 8 of the chassis is the client > machine. It goes through Switch 1 (a Brocade switch) to the top of rack > (BNT). The mirror is in the chassis switch. Slot 3 of the same chassis is > connected to the mirror port in Switch 1. > > client =

The variable 'ok' is never used and generates a warning. Remove it. Also ntfssect.c is designed to be compiled in non Unicode mode when using MSVC compilers, so remove all ambiguity about it (LPCTSTR -> LPCSTR, use of 'A' API calls) so that it doesn't break when compiled in Unicode mode, which is what Rufus uses with MSVC. -------------- next part --------------

I have a customer who is complaining about slow SFTP transfers over a long haul connection. The current transfer rate is limited by the TCP window size and the RTT. I looked at HPN-SSH, but that won't work because we don't control what software the peer is using. I was thinking about coding a much more modest enhancement that just does SO_RCVBUF for specific subsystems. In the interest

On Sat, Oct 03, 2015 at 09:20:10AM +0300, Ady via Syslinux wrote: > > > I have a patch that I think may help your situation of syslinux.efi > > being unable to load ldlinux.e64/ldlinux.e32 (though I don't know if > > any of you are using an EFI ia32 platform). > > > > The basics are that we try to enable UseDefaultAddress as it helps > > certain clients

Signed-off-by: Julien Viard de Galbert <jviarddegalbert at online.net> --- efi/udp.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/efi/udp.c b/efi/udp.c index 1088f47..b0f13ad 100644 --- a/efi/udp.c +++ b/efi/udp.c @@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ void core_udp_connect(struct pxe_pvt_inode *socket, uint32_t ip, } else { udata.UseDefaultAddress = FALSE;

I just installed CentOS 5 and put ZoneMinder on it. Everything seems to be working fine, except I can't access the web pages from a remote computer, even if it's on the same LAN. If I lynx to the webpage from the server itself the web page comes up. I checked iptables and there doesn't seem to be any block there. There is no firewall within my LAN that would block port 80. Any other