similar to: No subject

Hi everybody. I got a problem here. I want to use chroot + sshd service. env: RHEL 5.2 tail -1 /etc/pam.d/sshd session required pam_chroot.so debug tail /etc/security/chroot.conf terry /users ssh terry at 192.168.20.11 faile tail /var/log/secure Jun 7 05:05:40 node1 sshd[5397]: pam_chroot(sshd:session): chroot(/users) succeeded <- chroot /users succeeded Jun

On 01/29/2016 05:08 AM, Peter Steele wrote: > We have been researching stuck zombie processes in our libvirt lxc > containers. What we found was: > > 1) Each zombie’s parent was pid 1. init which symlinks to systemd. > 2) In some cases, the zombies were launched by systemd, in others the > zombie was inherited. > 3) While the child is in the zombie state, the parent

On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 10:25:08AM -0800, Peter Steele wrote: >On 01/29/2016 05:08 AM, Peter Steele wrote: >> We have been researching stuck zombie processes in our libvirt lxc >> containers. What we found was: >> >> 1) Each zombie’s parent was pid 1. init which symlinks to systemd. >> 2) In some cases, the zombies were launched by systemd, in others the >>

Hi, it seems the 2.5.0p1 announcement on www.openssh.com went out a little bit too early ;). Just curious, why 2.4 was skipped? I don't believe this is just to have a higher version number than the competition ;). I see 2.5.0 is there, but no 2.5.0p1 yet even on ftp.openbsd.org itself. Looking at the CVS tree, I see the two bugs I reported to this list some time ago (with no response) are

Hi, I am using the virtio-serial transport for communication between the host and the guest. I've created the channel using virt-install: virt-install --name=centos --import --disk /var/lib/libvirt/images/centos.img,size=15 \ --ram 2048 \ --vcpus=2 \ --arch=x86_64 --os-type linux --network=bridge:br1 --graphics vnc \ --noautoconsole \ --channel

I'm not on this mailing list so please make sure that I'm listed in any replies. There seems to be a basic flaw in either AIX pty's or many Linux applications and sshd falls into this category. sshd has a routine called openpty and it looks like ssh's version mimics the version in Linux. (I'm not sure where openpty comes from -- I'm assuming Linux.) The key to

Hi, Solaris (tested with 2.6) needs a username in the logout record in the wtmpx file. Currently openssh (version 2.3.0p1) leaves the username (utmpx.ut_user) empty in logout records, which leads to conflicting results from the last command. Example: # last -5 siegert siegert pts/186 stikine.ucs.sfu. Mon Jan 15 14:26 still logged in siegert pts/105 stikine.ucs.sfu. Mon Jan 15

Hello, looking at the pty handling in OpenSSH 2.3.0p1 (hasn't changed much in CVS, as far as I can tell after a quick look at it), I can see that if the system provides both /dev/ptmx and openpty() types of pty interface, the latter is preferred. This is the case on Linux with glibc 2.1.3 and most likely later versions too. However, openpty() is documented to be dangerous - quote from the

The vm host shows this: # setserial -g /dev/ttyS* /dev/ttyS0, UART: 16550A, Port: 0x03f8, IRQ: 4 /dev/ttyS1, UART: 16950/954, Port: 0xd040, IRQ: 17 /dev/ttyS2, UART: 16950/954, Port: 0xd048, IRQ: 17 /dev/ttyS3, UART: 16950/954, Port: 0xd050, IRQ: 17 # # ll /dev/ttyS* crw-rw----. 1 root dialout 4, 64 Nov 10 12:18 /dev/ttyS0 crw-rw----. 1 root dialout 4, 65 Nov 10 12:18 /dev/ttyS1 crw-rw----. 1

I hope this is not to far off topic. I have a Windows 2003 guest on a CentOS 5.5 KVM host. I need to use the serial port on the win2003 guest for the application it is serving. I have no idea what needs to be done but it looks like the linux host is trying to use the serial port as the priamary console but I don't really understand what that is or where it is configured. What I need is for

After upgrading to openssh-2.5.2p2, my users were unable to login using ssh Protocol 1. Entries like this were showing up in syslog: Apr 5 19:29:45 maple sshd[16726]: Accepted password for anthonyu from ::ffff:192.168.0.2 port 1019 Apr 5 19:29:45 maple sshd[16726]: fatal: stat(/dev/pts/1 19:29:45 sshd[16726]: Accepted password for anthonyu) failed: No such file or directory Apr 5 19:29:45

Hi there, I am using libvirt with lxc to create fedora 16 & 18 containers on fedora 18 host. first I did the setup with libvirt 1.0.3 and everything worked fine, then after upgrading to libvirt 1.0.4, I could not create character device on the guests : Test on the guest1 : # ls -l /dev total 0 lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 10 Apr 17 21:18 console -> /dev/pts/0 lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 11

Hi All. First the questions: Is there anything objectionable in this patch? Is AUDIT_FAIL_AUTH appropriate for the "Reason" field? Now the details: attached is a patch that changes some of the #includes for AIX. It moves the AIX-specific includes to port-aix.h and adds includes that contain the prototypes for many of the authentication functions. The idea isto fix some warnings.

[Mod: forwarded from BUGTRAQ -- alex] ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Sun, 6 Jun 1999 19:15:05 +0000 From: noc-wage <wage@IDIRECT.CA> To: BUGTRAQ@NETSPACE.ORG Subject: RedHat 6.0, /dev/pts permissions bug when using xterm Once again I''ve come up with another trivial Denial of Service flaw, (wow, I seem to be good at this Conseal Firewall, +++ath0, ppp byte-stuffing)

Hi all, Sorry for bothering you in this dev mailing list, I'm using libguestfs to customize some vm using as bases the ubuntu cloud images. But I noticed that it takes a lot and then fails when trying to install a packet. Same behaviour on Ubuntu 18.04 and Centos 7.5 Ubuntu: virt-customize 1.36.13 libvirtd (libvirt) 4.0.0 Centos: virt-customize 1.36.10rhel=7,release=6.el7_5.2,libvirt

Hi all, I encountered the following error when I tried to run virt-sysprep on a qcow2 image. virt-sysprep: error: no operating systems were found in the guest image The version I used for libguest is as follows: [libguestfs-1.36.5] The same issue happened on other versions such as libguestfs-1.32.7. # ./run ./sysprep/virt-sysprep -v -x -a

Hello All. Attached is an update to my previous patch to make do_pam_chauthtok and privsep play nicely together. First, a question: does anybody care about these or the password expiration patches? Anyway, the "PRIVSEP(do_pam_hauthtok())" has been moved to just after the pty has been allocated but before it's made the controlling tty. This allows the child running chauthtok to

below. Dan ___________________________________________________________________________ Dan Yocum | Phone: (630) 840-8525 Linux/Unix System Administrator | Fax: (630) 840-6345 Computing Division OSS/FSS | email: yocum@fnal.gov .~. L Fermi National Accelerator Lab | WWW: www-oss.fnal.gov/~yocum/ /V\ I P.O. Box 500 |

[Please keep replies on the list] > ************************************************************ > * IMPORTANT NOTICE > * > * When reporting bugs, include the COMPLETE, UNEDITED > * output below in your bug report. > * > ************************************************************ > libguestfs: trace: set_verbose true

I've tried the workaround you suggested but it doesn't seem to work. Also tried to add just "libsbz.so" to zz-workaround with no success. It throws the same error as before. PS: Sorry I've just hit reply without checking the "To:" address and I guess it sent directly to you. On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 1:59 PM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote: >