similar to: Sending signal to process via channel

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "Sending signal to process via channel"

2007 Dec 31
28
[Bug 1424] New: Cannot signal a process over a channel (rfc 4254, section 6 .9)
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1424 Summary: Cannot signal a process over a channel (rfc 4254, section 6.9) Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.7p1 Platform: ix86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd
2006 Sep 25
2
[Bug 1155] [META] Bug planned to be fixed for the 4.4 release
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1155 dtucker at zip.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Comment #5 from dtucker at zip.com.au 2006-09-25 18:24 ------- For the record, I believe all of the outstanding
2002 Jan 16
0
OpenSSH: Solaris login and utmpx
We're trying to build OpenSSH 3.0.2p1 for Solaris 8 (among others) and are running into a problem with UseLogin and utmpx. If we set "UseLogin no" then we can login okay. finger or who won't find us, even with a TTY allocated altough "who /etc/wtmpx" will find us. But the real problem is if we set "UseLogin true" which we must do for BSM support on some
2005 Jun 16
1
SSH 2.4.0 remote forward patch in next release?
I [1]reported a problem on 5-April-2005 about a problem with the 4.0p1 version and remote port forwarding to SSH 2.4.0 servers. I provided a patch for the problem but [2]was told that no more patches were being considered until 4.1 was released and that I should attach my patch to a new Bugzilla bug. This [3]I did. Is there any chance it will be included in the next release? 1.
2008 Nov 20
1
Possibility of implementing signal support from post in 2003?
Hi, Back in 2003 the developer of JSch, a Java SSH2 implementation, posted a thread regarding support for sending signals to remote processes here: http://marc.info/?l=openssh-unix-dev&m=104295745607575&w=2 The thread culminated in a patch provided by Markus Friedl, which Atsuhiko Yamanaka tested and reported as working (unofficially), which added support for this capability in the
2002 Mar 12
0
[Bug 160] New: Race condition in clientloop.c?
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160 Summary: Race condition in clientloop.c? Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.0.2p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org ReportedBy: Nicolas.Williams
2000 Sep 16
0
openssh-2.2.0p1-2 issue
I have checked the FAQ and the mailing list archives, but I haven't been able to RTFM to solve my problem. Thus turning to the dev list. 2.2.0p1 Changelog includes: 20000207 - Removed SOCKS code. Will support through a ProxyCommand. Relevant Mailing list archives: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openssh-unix-dev&m=95803710921359&w=2 and
2002 May 31
0
[Bug 261] New: AIX capabilities + port-aix.c cleanup
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=261 Summary: AIX capabilities + port-aix.c cleanup Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org ReportedBy:
2002 Sep 28
0
Portability patch for regression tests
Hi All, As threatened, I have rolled up the various portability patches for the regression tests. Assuming all is well, running the tests is as simple as "make tests", although some platforms (eg AIX) require "SUDO=sudo" first. I took the tests from OpenBSD CVS written by Markus and incorporated the patches written by Roumen Petrov and myself as well as various suggestions
2002 Oct 15
0
[Bug 414] New: sshd initially ignores -e (log_stderr) if -i (inetd_flag) is given
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=414 Summary: sshd initially ignores -e (log_stderr) if -i (inetd_flag) is given Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: All URL: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openssh-unix- dev&m=102469253706346&w=2 OS/Version: Linux
2003 May 12
0
[Bug 502] sshd fails when "Compression yes" set on HPUX
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=502 ------- Additional Comments From dtucker at zip.com.au 2003-05-12 19:12 ------- Is there an older libz in you library path? Mark Janssen reported an identical problem (all the way down to the number after "alloc") which was solved by recompiling zlib. See: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openssh-unix-dev&m=104487220204506
2000 Apr 26
1
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openssh-unix-dev&m=95669367427640&w=2 (fwd)
-- | "Bombay is 250ms from New York in the new world order" - Alan Cox | Damien Miller - http://www.mindrot.org/ | Email: djm at mindrot.org (home) -or- djm at ibs.com.au (work) ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 19:55:56 -0600 (MDT) From: Theo de Raadt <deraadt at cvs.openbsd.org> To: djm at cvs.openbsd.org, markus at cvs.openbsd.org, provos at
2003 Nov 23
5
[Bug 763] Add Null packet keepalive option
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=763 Summary: Add Null packet keepalive option Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.7p1 Platform: All URL: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openssh-unix- dev&m=98460103932386&w=2 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement
2005 Oct 20
2
KeepAlive/ClientAliveInterval not working? Idle timeout.
I have set /etc/ssh/sshd_config with: KeepAlive yes ClientAliveInterval 3 However, no KeepAlive type messages seem to be sent. I've verified this by looking at the network lights, which don't flicker every 3 seconds. I am attempting to keep interactive ssh sessions alive longer. If don't type anything for about 2 minutes, the sessions close. If I run a "idle"
2001 Jun 02
2
pam_opie
Hi, did a search in the archives for "opie" and this is the most recent message on the topic I see: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openssh-unix-dev&m=98536878202858&w=2 Nigel, would you mind sending me the source for the module you've extracted from that other distribution? Also, if anyone is interested in looking at other OPIE PAM modules, here are two more: Andy
2001 Sep 06
1
PAM overrides PermitEmptyPasswords
I noticed while investigating Debian Bug #93200 (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=93200&repeatmerged=yes) that sshd refuses a login if /etc/pam.d/ssh doesn't specify "nullok" after the pam_unix.so module -- is there any way to resolve this problem? It seems that OpenSSH should override PAM in this case, someone posted a patch on 6/19 that appears to address this
2004 May 12
1
Van Dyke's Public Key Assistant
Jeff Van Dyke's "Public Key Assistant subsystem" was previously discussed here: (end of a short thread) http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openssh-unix-dev&m=103436908422003&w=2 I do see a few comments that seem to point out his arrogance and some disgust about OpenBSD's RCSID, but has anybody found it to be unsecure or if it was bug ridden. The subject sorta dies right
2006 Feb 03
4
[Bug 1150] sshd records incorrect login times
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1150 Summary: sshd records incorrect login times Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.3p1 Platform: Other URL: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openssh-unix- dev&m=113890107022083&w=2 OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: major
2003 Nov 25
1
Strange behaviour w/ Solaris9 + pam_ldap + openssh 3.7.1p2
Hello, I have a Solaris 9 system which is using Sun's pam_ldap to access user & group information in a Netscape 4.16DS. This was working fine until I upgraded ssh on the box. However, now I'm using 3.7.1p2 with pam support I have the following problem: If a user (local or ldap) enters the correct password everything works fine. Entering a wrong password results in the sshd
2004 Mar 22
1
PermitRootLogin issues
Hello, I'm currently experiencing the issue laid out in this thread from last year: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openssh-unix-dev&m=106908815129641&w=2 The discussion that ensued resulted in a number of ideas on how best to 'fix' this issue. The two that seemed most reasonable were: 1. implement a pubkey-only option to PermitRootLogin that would only allow root to login