similar to: tcpip-forward with port 0 and 'want reply'

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2509 Bug ID: 2509 Summary: Unexpected change in tcpip-forward reply message in OpenSSH 6.8 Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.8p1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: sshd

http://25thandclement.com/~william/openssh-4.3p2-streamlocal-20060421.patch The above URL is a complete patch to OpenSSH 4.3p2 to implement unix domain socket forwarding (this supercedes a canceled message I sent last night w/ an inline attachment). Basically, for forward and reverse forwardings anywhere you previously put a port number you can now put a path. The socket path should go between

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2529 Bug ID: 2529 Summary: direct-streamlocal channel open doesn't match PROTOCOL documentation Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: ssh

Hi, I am trying to understand the ChannelTimeout option and whether it should work as I expect. I intended to use it to terminate inactive sessions, e.g. where no keystrokes / output is sent or SFTP sessions with no commands or data transfer. For testing I am using OpenSSH_9.6p1 Debian-5, OpenSSL 3.1.5 30 Jan 2024 both as the server and client. I set the following options in sshd_config:

Hello, there is a patch which allows redirecting UNIX domain sockets here: http://www.25thandclement.com/~william/projects/streamlocal.html<http://www.25thandclement.com/%7Ewilliam/projects/streamlocal.html> We really need it in our institution. It's for OpenSSH 4.4 but I managed to adopt it for 4.7p1 included in Ubuntu 8.04.

Hi there, I'm developing ssh client in pure java and, recently, I'm trying to improve the port forwarding support on that stuff. However, it seems to me that sshd of OpenSSH has not supported 'cancel-tcpip-forward' request. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-secsh-connect-17.txt says that | A port forwarding can be cancelled with the following message. |

As far as I know this patch has no security implications -- I don't believe that allowing sshd to use get_local_name() (in canohost.c) on a connected socket to determine it's own fqdn will allow a malicious client (or router or dns server) to make it come to the wrong conclusion. But please let me know if you think I'm wrong. Please also let me know if you're just not interested

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=756 Summary: sshd does not support global request cancel-tcpip- forward Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: openssh-bugs at

I've updated the streamlocal patch for OpenSSH 4.4p1. http://www.25thandclement.com/~william/projects/streamlocal.html This patch allows for local and remote forwards, to and from Unix domain sockets. Simply specify the socket path, enclosed within squares braces (i.e. -L[/tmp/.s.PGSQL.5432]:[/tmp/.s.PGSQL.5432]) as the origin and/or destination of the -R and -L switches. This patch also

I'm merging my "streamlocal" unix domain socket forwarding patch into 4.4p1 (or rather 20060926 SNAP) and I gather that the ExitOnForwardFailure capability only works for protocol 1.0. Am I misreading things? I was really looking forward to that feature. I noticed when I began fixing a merge reject in channel_request_remote_forwarding(). - Bill

When forwarding a Unix-domain socket, the remote socket path must be absolute (otherwise the forwarding fails later). However, guessing absolute path on the remote end is sometimes not straightforward, because the file system location may vary for many reasons, including the system installation, the choices of NFS mount points, or the remote user ID. To allow ssh clients to request remote socket

I'll be maintaining the streamlocal patch(s)--which teach(es) OpenSSH to forward local and remote domain sockets--here: http://www.25thandclement.com/~william/projects/streamlocal.html - Bill

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1256 Colin Watson <cjwatson at debian.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cjwatson at debian.org --- Comment #7 from Colin Watson <cjwatson at debian.org> --- It looks as though

Hi there, I have a client in a network using a samba-server that has to use MSDOS, because some software running on it needs a clean DOS. I installed the DOS-Client for TCPIP that is available from Microsoft V 1.0 and it works fine; the only thing is, that it takes so much memory below 640 K, that another program also running under DOS does not function correctly anymore. Maybe some of the

We came across this article recently. Does anyone know if libvirt-lxc under CentOS 7 is impacted by this bug? It mentions that a fix for this has been ported back as far as 3.14 kernels, but CentOS 7.1 is still only at 3.10. http://linux.slashdot.org/story/16/02/22/1715202/linux-virtual-ethernet-bug-delivers-corrupt-tcpip-data

I am currently running Centos 5.2 with 2.6.18-92.1.13.el5xen with 2 domu's One another Centos 5.2 and another Windows XP. The Centos DomU works fine and I never have any problems however my XP DomU crashes every so often with the bluescreen DRIVER_IRQL_NOT_LESS_OR_EQUAL then under the technical information tcpip.sys addres xxxxxx base at xxxxx datetime Xxxxxxxxx Is there a driver

hello everybody i?m trying to connect to my postgresql via tcpip and it thow an error is not accepting tcp-ip connections I ask to google but i dont find the solution, people said about the prostgresql.conf enable tcpip, I try but when i start the service it thow an error. Other thing is add the option i to postmaster.opt but when i start the service this file is redefined anybody can helpme

Fun, fun. I suggest checking the corresponding MTA configuration :) Return-Path: <David.Bear@asu.edu> Delivered-To: rohrbach@mail.webmonster.de Received: (qmail 56434 invoked by uid 801); 24 Sep 2004 15:51:37 -0000 Delivered-To: vrohrbach-karsten@rohrbach.de Received: (qmail 56429 invoked from network); 24 Sep 2004 15:51:36 -0000 Received: from post5.inre.asu.edu (129.219.110.120) by

Hi folks, (3rd time I am sending this message, none of the other appear to have made it through!) Using "OpenSSH_6.9p1 Ubuntu-2ubuntu0.1, OpenSSL 1.0.2d 9 Jul 2015" on the server, "OpenSSH_7.2p2, OpenSSL 1.0.2g 1 Mar 2016" on the client. I am trying to use sshtunnel with StreamLocal forwarding to enable me to connect back to the client's ssh port, without having to

Hi, The code definitely attempts to unlink any old listener beforehand (see misc.c:unix_listener()) so I don't understand why that isn't being called. You might try simulating your configuration using sshd's -T and -C to make sure the flag is correctly being set. Could chroot be interfering? Some platforms implement additional restrictions on devices and sockets inside chroot. -d